diff mbox series

[for-8.2?,v2,4/4] util/interval-tree: Use qatomic_read/set for rb_parent_color

Message ID 20230722214422.118743-5-richard.henderson@linaro.org
State Superseded
Headers show
Series util/interval-tree: Avoid race conditions without optimization | expand

Commit Message

Richard Henderson July 22, 2023, 9:44 p.m. UTC 
While less susceptible to optimization problems than left and right,
interval_tree_iter_next also reads rb_parent(), so make sure that
stores and loads are atomic.

This goes further than technically required, changing all loads to
be atomic, rather than simply the ones in the iteration side.  But
it doesn't really affect the code generation on the rebalance side
and is cleaner to handle everything the same.

Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
---
 util/interval-tree.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

Comments

Peter Maydell July 24, 2023, 11:53 a.m. UTC | #1 
On Sat, 22 Jul 2023 at 22:44, Richard Henderson
<richard.henderson@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> While less susceptible to optimization problems than left and right,
> interval_tree_iter_next also reads rb_parent(), so make sure that
> stores and loads are atomic.
>
> This goes further than technically required, changing all loads to
> be atomic, rather than simply the ones in the iteration side.  But
> it doesn't really affect the code generation on the rebalance side
> and is cleaner to handle everything the same.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>

thanks
-- PMM
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/util/interval-tree.c b/util/interval-tree.c
index d86c0752db..f2866aa7d3 100644
--- a/util/interval-tree.c
+++ b/util/interval-tree.c
@@ -48,12 +48,6 @@ 
  *
  * It also guarantees that if the lookup returns an element it is the 'correct'
  * one. But not returning an element does _NOT_ mean it's not present.
- *
- * NOTE:
- *
- * Stores to __rb_parent_color are not important for simple lookups so those
- * are left undone as of now. Nor did I check for loops involving parent
- * pointers.
  */
 
 typedef enum RBColor
@@ -68,6 +62,16 @@  typedef struct RBAugmentCallbacks {
     void (*rotate)(RBNode *old, RBNode *new);
 } RBAugmentCallbacks;
 
+static inline uintptr_t rb_pc(const RBNode *n)
+{
+    return qatomic_read(&n->rb_parent_color);
+}
+
+static inline void rb_set_pc(RBNode *n, uintptr_t pc)
+{
+    qatomic_set(&n->rb_parent_color, pc);
+}
+
 static inline RBNode *pc_parent(uintptr_t pc)
 {
     return (RBNode *)(pc & ~1);
@@ -75,12 +79,12 @@  static inline RBNode *pc_parent(uintptr_t pc)
 
 static inline RBNode *rb_parent(const RBNode *n)
 {
-    return pc_parent(n->rb_parent_color);
+    return pc_parent(rb_pc(n));
 }
 
 static inline RBNode *rb_red_parent(const RBNode *n)
 {
-    return (RBNode *)n->rb_parent_color;
+    return (RBNode *)rb_pc(n);
 }
 
 static inline RBColor pc_color(uintptr_t pc)
@@ -100,27 +104,27 @@  static inline bool pc_is_black(uintptr_t pc)
 
 static inline RBColor rb_color(const RBNode *n)
 {
-    return pc_color(n->rb_parent_color);
+    return pc_color(rb_pc(n));
 }
 
 static inline bool rb_is_red(const RBNode *n)
 {
-    return pc_is_red(n->rb_parent_color);
+    return pc_is_red(rb_pc(n));
 }
 
 static inline bool rb_is_black(const RBNode *n)
 {
-    return pc_is_black(n->rb_parent_color);
+    return pc_is_black(rb_pc(n));
 }
 
 static inline void rb_set_black(RBNode *n)
 {
-    n->rb_parent_color |= RB_BLACK;
+    rb_set_pc(n, rb_pc(n) | RB_BLACK);
 }
 
 static inline void rb_set_parent_color(RBNode *n, RBNode *p, RBColor color)
 {
-    n->rb_parent_color = (uintptr_t)p | color;
+    rb_set_pc(n, (uintptr_t)p | color);
 }
 
 static inline void rb_set_parent(RBNode *n, RBNode *p)
@@ -186,9 +190,10 @@  static inline void rb_change_child(RBNode *old, RBNode *new,
 static inline void rb_rotate_set_parents(RBNode *old, RBNode *new,
                                          RBRoot *root, RBColor color)
 {
-    RBNode *parent = rb_parent(old);
+    uintptr_t pc = rb_pc(old);
+    RBNode *parent = pc_parent(pc);
 
-    new->rb_parent_color = old->rb_parent_color;
+    rb_set_pc(new, pc);
     rb_set_parent_color(old, new, color);
     rb_change_child(old, new, parent, root);
 }
@@ -536,11 +541,11 @@  static void rb_erase_augmented(RBNode *node, RBRoot *root,
          * and node must be black due to 4). We adjust colors locally
          * so as to bypass rb_erase_color() later on.
          */
-        pc = node->rb_parent_color;
+        pc = rb_pc(node);
         parent = pc_parent(pc);
         rb_change_child(node, child, parent, root);
         if (child) {
-            child->rb_parent_color = pc;
+            rb_set_pc(child, pc);
             rebalance = NULL;
         } else {
             rebalance = pc_is_black(pc) ? parent : NULL;
@@ -548,9 +553,9 @@  static void rb_erase_augmented(RBNode *node, RBRoot *root,
         tmp = parent;
     } else if (!child) {
         /* Still case 1, but this time the child is node->rb_left */
-        pc = node->rb_parent_color;
+        pc = rb_pc(node);
         parent = pc_parent(pc);
-        tmp->rb_parent_color = pc;
+        rb_set_pc(tmp, pc);
         rb_change_child(node, tmp, parent, root);
         rebalance = NULL;
         tmp = parent;
@@ -604,7 +609,7 @@  static void rb_erase_augmented(RBNode *node, RBRoot *root,
         qatomic_set(&successor->rb_left, tmp);
         rb_set_parent(tmp, successor);
 
-        pc = node->rb_parent_color;
+        pc = rb_pc(node);
         tmp = pc_parent(pc);
         rb_change_child(node, successor, tmp, root);
 
@@ -614,7 +619,7 @@  static void rb_erase_augmented(RBNode *node, RBRoot *root,
         } else {
             rebalance = rb_is_black(successor) ? parent : NULL;
         }
-        successor->rb_parent_color = pc;
+        rb_set_pc(successor, pc);
         tmp = successor;
     }