Message ID | 20231001-vf610-gpio-v5-4-8d873a8f224a@nxp.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | None | expand |
Hi Peng, On 23-10-02, Peng Fan wrote: > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/7] gpio: vf610: add i.MX8ULP of_device_id entry > > > > On Sun, Oct 1, 2023 at 10:23 AM Peng Fan (OSS) <peng.fan@oss.nxp.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com> > > > > > > i.MX8ULP/93 GPIO supports similar feature as i.MX7ULP GPIO, but > > > i.MX8ULP is actually not hardware compatible with i.MX7ULP. i.MX8ULP > > > only has one register base, not two bases. i.MX8ULP and i.MX93 > > > actually has two interrupts for each gpio controller, one for > > > Trustzone non-secure world, one for secure world. > > > > > > Although the Linux Kernel driver gpio-vf610.c could work with > > > fsl,imx7ulp-gpio compatible, it is based on some tricks did in device > > > tree with some offset added to base address. > > > > > > Add a new of_device_id entry for i.MX8ULP. But to make the driver > > > could also support old bindings, check the compatible string first, > > > before check the device data. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com> > > > --- > > > drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c | 47 > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- > > > 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c > > > index dbc7ba0ee72c..8e12706c0b22 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c > > > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c > > > @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ > > > struct fsl_gpio_soc_data { > > > /* SoCs has a Port Data Direction Register (PDDR) */ > > > bool have_paddr; > > > + bool have_dual_base; > > > }; > > > > > > struct vf610_gpio_port { > > > @@ -60,13 +61,26 @@ struct vf610_gpio_port { > > > #define PORT_INT_EITHER_EDGE 0xb > > > #define PORT_INT_LOGIC_ONE 0xc > > > > > > +#define IMX8ULP_GPIO_BASE_OFF 0x40 > > > +#define IMX8ULP_BASE_OFF 0x80 > > > + > > > +static const struct fsl_gpio_soc_data vf610_data = { > > > + .have_dual_base = true, > > > +}; > > > + > > > static const struct fsl_gpio_soc_data imx_data = { > > > .have_paddr = true, > > > + .have_dual_base = true, > > > +}; > > > + > > > +static const struct fsl_gpio_soc_data imx8ulp_data = { > > > + .have_paddr = true, > > > }; > > > > > > static const struct of_device_id vf610_gpio_dt_ids[] = { > > > - { .compatible = "fsl,vf610-gpio", .data = NULL, }, > > > + { .compatible = "fsl,vf610-gpio", .data = &vf610_data }, > > > { .compatible = "fsl,imx7ulp-gpio", .data = &imx_data, }, > > > + { .compatible = "fsl,imx8ulp-gpio", .data = &imx8ulp_data, }, > > > { /* sentinel */ } > > > }; > > > > > > @@ -263,19 +277,38 @@ static int vf610_gpio_probe(struct > > platform_device *pdev) > > > struct gpio_irq_chip *girq; > > > int i; > > > int ret; > > > + bool dual_base; > > > > > > port = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*port), GFP_KERNEL); > > > if (!port) > > > return -ENOMEM; > > > > > > port->sdata = of_device_get_match_data(dev); > > > - port->base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0); > > > - if (IS_ERR(port->base)) > > > - return PTR_ERR(port->base); > > > > > > - port->gpio_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 1); > > > - if (IS_ERR(port->gpio_base)) > > > - return PTR_ERR(port->gpio_base); > > > + dual_base = port->sdata->have_dual_base; > > > + > > > + /* support old compatible strings */ > > > + if (device_is_compatible(dev, "fsl,imx7ulp-gpio") && > > > + (device_is_compatible(dev, "fsl,imx93-gpio") || > > > > Why not just add this compatible to vf610_gpio_dt_ids? > > "fsl,imx93-gpio", "fsl,imx7ulp-gpio" is not a correct entry > combination. This is to support legacy old compatible > strings. The "/* support old compatible strings */" may a bit misleading here? Should we be a bit more verbose for the reader of the code, e.g.: /* * Handle legacy compatible combinations which used two * reg values for the i.MX8ULP and i.MX93. */ Regards, Marco > > Thanks, > Peng. > > > > Bart > > > > > + (device_is_compatible(dev, "fsl,imx8ulp-gpio")))) > > > + dual_base = true; > > > + > > > + if (dual_base) { > > > + port->base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0); > > > + if (IS_ERR(port->base)) > > > + return PTR_ERR(port->base); > > > + > > > + port->gpio_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 1); > > > + if (IS_ERR(port->gpio_base)) > > > + return PTR_ERR(port->gpio_base); > > > + } else { > > > + port->base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0); > > > + if (IS_ERR(port->base)) > > > + return PTR_ERR(port->base); > > > + > > > + port->gpio_base = port->base + IMX8ULP_GPIO_BASE_OFF; > > > + port->base = port->base + IMX8ULP_BASE_OFF; > > > + } > > > > > > port->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0); > > > if (port->irq < 0) > > > > > > -- > > > 2.37.1 > > >
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c index dbc7ba0ee72c..8e12706c0b22 100644 --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ struct fsl_gpio_soc_data { /* SoCs has a Port Data Direction Register (PDDR) */ bool have_paddr; + bool have_dual_base; }; struct vf610_gpio_port { @@ -60,13 +61,26 @@ struct vf610_gpio_port { #define PORT_INT_EITHER_EDGE 0xb #define PORT_INT_LOGIC_ONE 0xc +#define IMX8ULP_GPIO_BASE_OFF 0x40 +#define IMX8ULP_BASE_OFF 0x80 + +static const struct fsl_gpio_soc_data vf610_data = { + .have_dual_base = true, +}; + static const struct fsl_gpio_soc_data imx_data = { .have_paddr = true, + .have_dual_base = true, +}; + +static const struct fsl_gpio_soc_data imx8ulp_data = { + .have_paddr = true, }; static const struct of_device_id vf610_gpio_dt_ids[] = { - { .compatible = "fsl,vf610-gpio", .data = NULL, }, + { .compatible = "fsl,vf610-gpio", .data = &vf610_data }, { .compatible = "fsl,imx7ulp-gpio", .data = &imx_data, }, + { .compatible = "fsl,imx8ulp-gpio", .data = &imx8ulp_data, }, { /* sentinel */ } }; @@ -263,19 +277,38 @@ static int vf610_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) struct gpio_irq_chip *girq; int i; int ret; + bool dual_base; port = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*port), GFP_KERNEL); if (!port) return -ENOMEM; port->sdata = of_device_get_match_data(dev); - port->base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0); - if (IS_ERR(port->base)) - return PTR_ERR(port->base); - port->gpio_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 1); - if (IS_ERR(port->gpio_base)) - return PTR_ERR(port->gpio_base); + dual_base = port->sdata->have_dual_base; + + /* support old compatible strings */ + if (device_is_compatible(dev, "fsl,imx7ulp-gpio") && + (device_is_compatible(dev, "fsl,imx93-gpio") || + (device_is_compatible(dev, "fsl,imx8ulp-gpio")))) + dual_base = true; + + if (dual_base) { + port->base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0); + if (IS_ERR(port->base)) + return PTR_ERR(port->base); + + port->gpio_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 1); + if (IS_ERR(port->gpio_base)) + return PTR_ERR(port->gpio_base); + } else { + port->base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0); + if (IS_ERR(port->base)) + return PTR_ERR(port->base); + + port->gpio_base = port->base + IMX8ULP_GPIO_BASE_OFF; + port->base = port->base + IMX8ULP_BASE_OFF; + } port->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0); if (port->irq < 0)