Message ID | 20231005160550.2423075-1-quic_devipriy@quicinc.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Add PWM support for IPQ chipsets | expand |
On Thu, 05 Oct 2023 21:35:46 +0530, Devi Priya wrote: > Add PWM driver and binding support for IPQ chipsets. > Also, add support for pwm node in ipq6018. > > V15: > Detailed Change logs are added to the respective patches. > > V14 can be found at: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20231005043127.2690639-1-quic_devipriy@quicinc.com/ > > [...] Applied, thanks! [1/4] pwm: driver for qualcomm ipq6018 pwm block (no commit info) [2/4] dt-bindings: pwm: add IPQ6018 binding (no commit info) [3/4] dt-bindings: mfd: qcom,tcsr: Add simple-mfd support for IPQ6018 commit: b4a32d218d424b81a58fbd419e1114b1c1f76168 [4/4] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq6018: add pwm node (no commit info) -- Lee Jones [李琼斯]
On 05/10/2023 18:05, Devi Priya wrote: > Add PWM driver and binding support for IPQ chipsets. > Also, add support for pwm node in ipq6018. > You need to clearly mark dependencies. Next is now broken because of this patchset. Best regards, Krzysztof
Hello, On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 06:29:30PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 05/10/2023 18:05, Devi Priya wrote: > > Add PWM driver and binding support for IPQ chipsets. > > Also, add support for pwm node in ipq6018. > > > > You need to clearly mark dependencies. This is something I wouldn't blame Devi for. The dependency is not very obvious and its kind of normal and expected for a patch series to have dependencies. *shrug* > Next is now broken because of this patchset. If I understand correctly this affects "only" the dtb check targets, right? Is this bad enough that it needs an urgent fix? I would expect it doesn't hurt much, am I right here? I just looked into patch #2 and had a few comments for it. Best regards Uwe
On 18/10/2023 22:52, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > Hello, > > On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 06:29:30PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 05/10/2023 18:05, Devi Priya wrote: >>> Add PWM driver and binding support for IPQ chipsets. >>> Also, add support for pwm node in ipq6018. >>> >> >> You need to clearly mark dependencies. > > This is something I wouldn't blame Devi for. The dependency is not very > obvious and its kind of normal and expected for a patch series to have > dependencies. *shrug* > >> Next is now broken because of this patchset. > > If I understand correctly this affects "only" the dtb check targets, > right? Is this bad enough that it needs an urgent fix? I would expect it > doesn't hurt much, am I right here? > > I just looked into patch #2 and had a few comments for it. Check/Tests of bindings (make dt_binding_check) has warnings because of missing PWM schema. Best regards, Krzysztof