Message ID | 20231102165640.3307820-18-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | drm: Convert to platform remove callback returning void | expand |
[Dropped a few people from To that resulted in bounces before.] On Thu, Nov 02, 2023 at 05:56:41PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > Hello, > > this series converts all platform drivers below drivers/gpu/drm to use > .remove_new(). It starts with a fix for a problem that potentially might > crash the kernel that I stumbled over while implementing the conversion. > > Some of the conversion patches following this fix were already send in > earlier series: > > https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20230801110239.831099-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de > https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20230318190804.234610-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de > > and three patches (bridge/tpd12s015, exynos + tilcdc) are new. Parts of > the above series were picked up, the patches resend here are not. Apart from a Reviewed-by: by Toni Valkeinen for patch #16 and Inki Dae who wrote to have taken patch #8 (but that didn't appear in neither next nor drm-misc-next yet). Also in v2 they didn't result in euphoric replies. Can someone who cares about drm as a whole please care for this series apply it? Best regards Uwe
Hi Am 20.11.23 um 13:05 schrieb Uwe Kleine-König: > [Dropped a few people from To that resulted in bounces before.] > > On Thu, Nov 02, 2023 at 05:56:41PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: >> Hello, >> >> this series converts all platform drivers below drivers/gpu/drm to use >> .remove_new(). It starts with a fix for a problem that potentially might >> crash the kernel that I stumbled over while implementing the conversion. >> >> Some of the conversion patches following this fix were already send in >> earlier series: >> >> https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20230801110239.831099-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de >> https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20230318190804.234610-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de >> >> and three patches (bridge/tpd12s015, exynos + tilcdc) are new. Parts of >> the above series were picked up, the patches resend here are not. > > Apart from a Reviewed-by: by Toni Valkeinen for patch #16 and Inki Dae > who wrote to have taken patch #8 (but that didn't appear in neither next > nor drm-misc-next yet). > > Also in v2 they didn't result in euphoric replies. > > Can someone who cares about drm as a whole please care for this series > apply it? Except for patches 8 and 16, I've pushed this patchset into drm-misc-next. Best regards Thomas > > Best regards > Uwe >