diff mbox series

[RFC,bpf-next,v3,07/16] bpf/helpers: mark the callback of bpf_timer_set_sleepable_cb() as sleepable

Message ID 20240221-hid-bpf-sleepable-v3-7-1fb378ca6301@kernel.org
State New
Headers show
Series sleepable bpf_timer (was: allow HID-BPF to do device IOs) | expand

Commit Message

Benjamin Tissoires Feb. 21, 2024, 4:25 p.m. UTC 
Now that we have bpf_timer_set_sleepable_cb() available and working, we
can tag the attached callback as sleepable, and let the verifier check
in the correct context the calls and kfuncs.

Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@kernel.org>

---

new in v3 (split from v2 02/10)
---
 include/linux/bpf_verifier.h |  2 ++
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c        | 16 +++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Eduard Zingerman Feb. 23, 2024, 3:35 p.m. UTC | #1 
On Wed, 2024-02-21 at 17:25 +0100, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:

[...]

> @@ -626,6 +627,7 @@ struct bpf_subprog_info {
>  	bool is_async_cb: 1;
>  	bool is_exception_cb: 1;
>  	bool args_cached: 1;
> +	bool is_sleepable: 1;
>  
>  	u8 arg_cnt;
>  	struct bpf_subprog_arg_info args[MAX_BPF_FUNC_REG_ARGS];

[...]

> @@ -2421,6 +2424,7 @@ static struct bpf_verifier_state *push_async_cb(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
>  	 * Initialize it similar to do_check_common().
>  	 */
>  	elem->st.branches = 1;
> +	elem->st.in_sleepable = env->subprog_info[subprog].is_sleepable;
>  	frame = kzalloc(sizeof(*frame), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!frame)
>  		goto err;

[...]

> @@ -9478,6 +9483,7 @@ static int push_callback_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *ins
>  
>  		/* there is no real recursion here. timer callbacks are async */
>  		env->subprog_info[subprog].is_async_cb = true;
> +		env->subprog_info[subprog].is_sleepable = is_bpf_timer_set_sleepable_cb_kfunc(insn->imm);
>  		async_cb = push_async_cb(env, env->subprog_info[subprog].start,
>  					 insn_idx, subprog);

I'd make is_sleepable a parameter for push_async_cb() instead of a field
in struct bpf_subprog_info.
I had to spend some time convincing myself that bpf_subprog_info->is_sleepable
does not have to be computed before do_check() in check_cfg(),
or what would happen if same callback is passed as both sleepable and
non-sleepable callback. These questions won't arise if this is a parameter.

[...]
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
index 84365e6dd85d..789ef5fec547 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
@@ -426,6 +426,7 @@  struct bpf_verifier_state {
 	 * while they are still in use.
 	 */
 	bool used_as_loop_entry;
+	bool in_sleepable;
 
 	/* first and last insn idx of this verifier state */
 	u32 first_insn_idx;
@@ -626,6 +627,7 @@  struct bpf_subprog_info {
 	bool is_async_cb: 1;
 	bool is_exception_cb: 1;
 	bool args_cached: 1;
+	bool is_sleepable: 1;
 
 	u8 arg_cnt;
 	struct bpf_subprog_arg_info args[MAX_BPF_FUNC_REG_ARGS];
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 91e583c6feba..4766c43606c4 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -505,6 +505,8 @@  static bool is_async_callback_calling_kfunc(u32 btf_id);
 static bool is_callback_calling_kfunc(u32 btf_id);
 static bool is_bpf_throw_kfunc(struct bpf_insn *insn);
 
+static bool is_bpf_timer_set_sleepable_cb_kfunc(u32 btf_id);
+
 static bool is_sync_callback_calling_function(enum bpf_func_id func_id)
 {
 	return func_id == BPF_FUNC_for_each_map_elem ||
@@ -1422,6 +1424,7 @@  static int copy_verifier_state(struct bpf_verifier_state *dst_state,
 	}
 	dst_state->speculative = src->speculative;
 	dst_state->active_rcu_lock = src->active_rcu_lock;
+	dst_state->in_sleepable = src->in_sleepable;
 	dst_state->curframe = src->curframe;
 	dst_state->active_lock.ptr = src->active_lock.ptr;
 	dst_state->active_lock.id = src->active_lock.id;
@@ -2421,6 +2424,7 @@  static struct bpf_verifier_state *push_async_cb(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 	 * Initialize it similar to do_check_common().
 	 */
 	elem->st.branches = 1;
+	elem->st.in_sleepable = env->subprog_info[subprog].is_sleepable;
 	frame = kzalloc(sizeof(*frame), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!frame)
 		goto err;
@@ -5265,7 +5269,8 @@  static int map_kptr_match_type(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 
 static bool in_sleepable(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 {
-	return env->prog->aux->sleepable;
+	return env->prog->aux->sleepable ||
+	       (env->cur_state && env->cur_state->in_sleepable);
 }
 
 /* The non-sleepable programs and sleepable programs with explicit bpf_rcu_read_lock()
@@ -9478,6 +9483,7 @@  static int push_callback_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *ins
 
 		/* there is no real recursion here. timer callbacks are async */
 		env->subprog_info[subprog].is_async_cb = true;
+		env->subprog_info[subprog].is_sleepable = is_bpf_timer_set_sleepable_cb_kfunc(insn->imm);
 		async_cb = push_async_cb(env, env->subprog_info[subprog].start,
 					 insn_idx, subprog);
 		if (!async_cb)
@@ -11361,6 +11367,11 @@  static bool is_bpf_throw_kfunc(struct bpf_insn *insn)
 	       insn->imm == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_throw];
 }
 
+static bool is_bpf_timer_set_sleepable_cb_kfunc(u32 btf_id)
+{
+	return btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_timer_set_sleepable_cb];
+}
+
 static bool is_callback_calling_kfunc(u32 btf_id)
 {
 	return is_sync_callback_calling_kfunc(btf_id) ||
@@ -16830,6 +16841,9 @@  static bool states_equal(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 	if (old->active_rcu_lock != cur->active_rcu_lock)
 		return false;
 
+	if (old->in_sleepable != cur->in_sleepable)
+		return false;
+
 	/* for states to be equal callsites have to be the same
 	 * and all frame states need to be equivalent
 	 */