mbox series

[v1,0/4] Enable shared SE support over I2C

Message ID 20240829092418.2863659-1-quic_msavaliy@quicinc.com
Headers show
Series Enable shared SE support over I2C | expand

Message

Mukesh Kumar Savaliya Aug. 29, 2024, 9:24 a.m. UTC
This Series adds support to share QUP based I2C SE between subsystems.
Each subsystem should have its own GPII which interacts between SE and
GSI DMA HW engine.

Subsystem must acquire Lock over the SE on GPII channel so that it
gets uninterrupted control till it unlocks the SE. It also makes sure
the commonly shared TLMM GPIOs are not touched which can impact other
subsystem or cause any interruption. Generally, GPIOs are being
unconfigured during suspend time. 

GSI DMA engine is capable to perform requested transfer operations
from any of the SE in a seamless way and its transparent to the
subsystems. Make sure to enable “qcom,shared-se” flag only while
enabling this feature. I2C client should add in its respective parent
node.

---
Mukesh Kumar Savaliya (4):
  dt-bindindgs: i2c: qcom,i2c-geni: Document shared flag
  dma: gpi: Add Lock and Unlock TRE support to access SE exclusively
  soc: qcom: geni-se: Export function geni_se_clks_off()
  i2c: i2c-qcom-geni: Enable i2c controller sharing between two
    subsystems

 .../bindings/i2c/qcom,i2c-geni-qcom.yaml      |  4 ++
 drivers/dma/qcom/gpi.c                        | 37 ++++++++++++++++++-
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c            | 29 +++++++++++----
 drivers/soc/qcom/qcom-geni-se.c               |  4 +-
 include/linux/dma/qcom-gpi-dma.h              |  6 +++
 include/linux/soc/qcom/geni-se.h              |  3 ++
 6 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

Comments

neil.armstrong@linaro.org Aug. 30, 2024, 7:47 a.m. UTC | #1
Hi,

On 29/08/2024 11:24, Mukesh Kumar Savaliya wrote:
> This Series adds support to share QUP based I2C SE between subsystems.
> Each subsystem should have its own GPII which interacts between SE and
> GSI DMA HW engine.
> 
> Subsystem must acquire Lock over the SE on GPII channel so that it
> gets uninterrupted control till it unlocks the SE. It also makes sure
> the commonly shared TLMM GPIOs are not touched which can impact other
> subsystem or cause any interruption. Generally, GPIOs are being
> unconfigured during suspend time.
> 
> GSI DMA engine is capable to perform requested transfer operations
> from any of the SE in a seamless way and its transparent to the
> subsystems. Make sure to enable “qcom,shared-se” flag only while
> enabling this feature. I2C client should add in its respective parent
> node.
> 
> ---
> Mukesh Kumar Savaliya (4):
>    dt-bindindgs: i2c: qcom,i2c-geni: Document shared flag
>    dma: gpi: Add Lock and Unlock TRE support to access SE exclusively
>    soc: qcom: geni-se: Export function geni_se_clks_off()
>    i2c: i2c-qcom-geni: Enable i2c controller sharing between two
>      subsystems
> 
>   .../bindings/i2c/qcom,i2c-geni-qcom.yaml      |  4 ++
>   drivers/dma/qcom/gpi.c                        | 37 ++++++++++++++++++-
>   drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c            | 29 +++++++++++----
>   drivers/soc/qcom/qcom-geni-se.c               |  4 +-
>   include/linux/dma/qcom-gpi-dma.h              |  6 +++
>   include/linux/soc/qcom/geni-se.h              |  3 ++
>   6 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 

I see in downstream that this flag is used on the SM8650 qupv3_se6_i2c,
and that on the SM8650-HDK this i2c is shared between the aDSP battmgr and
the linux to access the HDMI controller.

Is this is the target use-case ?

We have some issues on this platform that crashes the system when Linux
does some I2C transfers while battmgr does some access at the same time,
the problem is that on the Linux side the i2c uses the SE DMA and not GPI
because fifo_disable=0 so by default this bypasses GPI.

A temporary fix has been merged:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240605-topic-sm8650-upstream-hdk-iommu-fix-v1-1-9fd7233725fa@linaro.org/
but it's clearly not a real solution

What would be the solution to use the shared i2c with on one side battmgr
using GPI and the kernel using SE DMA ?

In this case, shouldn't we force using GPI on linux with:
==============><=====================================================================
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c
index ee2e431601a6..a15825ea56de 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c
@@ -885,7 +885,7 @@ static int geni_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
         else
                 fifo_disable = readl_relaxed(gi2c->se.base + GENI_IF_DISABLE_RO) & FIFO_IF_DISABLE;

-       if (fifo_disable) {
+       if (gi2c->is_shared || fifo_disable) {
                 /* FIFO is disabled, so we can only use GPI DMA */
                 gi2c->gpi_mode = true;
                 ret = setup_gpi_dma(gi2c);
==============><=====================================================================

Neil
Krzysztof Kozlowski Aug. 30, 2024, 8:11 a.m. UTC | #2
On 29/08/2024 11:24, Mukesh Kumar Savaliya wrote:
> Adds qcom,shared-se flag usage. Use this when particular I2C serial
> controller needs to be shared between two subsystems.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mukesh Kumar Savaliya <quic_msavaliy@quicinc.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/qcom,i2c-geni-qcom.yaml | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

<form letter>
Please use scripts/get_maintainers.pl to get a list of necessary people
and lists to CC. It might happen, that command when run on an older
kernel, gives you outdated entries. Therefore please be sure you base
your patches on recent Linux kernel.

Tools like b4 or scripts/get_maintainer.pl provide you proper list of
people, so fix your workflow. Tools might also fail if you work on some
ancient tree (don't, instead use mainline) or work on fork of kernel
(don't, instead use mainline). Just use b4 and everything should be
fine, although remember about `b4 prep --auto-to-cc` if you added new
patches to the patchset.

You missed at least devicetree list (maybe more), so this won't be
tested by automated tooling. Performing review on untested code might be
a waste of time.

Please kindly resend and include all necessary To/Cc entries.
</form letter>

Best regards,
Krzysztof