| Message ID | 20241021101836.9047-1-gautham.shenoy@amd.com |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | amd-pstate: Make amd-pstate the default driver on server platforms | expand |
On 10/21/2024 05:18, Gautham R. Shenoy wrote: > Hello, > > This patchset contains two patches to > > * Prevent frequency throttling on power-limited systems with > amd-pstate active mode with performance governor. > > * Make amd_pstate default on EPYC Family 1A+. Based on tests, the > amd-pstate driver performs well enough on EPYC. > > These patches are based on the "linux-next" branch of > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/superm1/linux.git > > Gautham R. Shenoy (1): > amd-pstate: Set min_perf to nominal_perf for active mode performance > gov > > Swapnil Sapkal (1): > amd-pstate: Switch to amd-pstate by default on some Server platforms > > drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com> I'll queue this up for 6.13. There were previously two differences for server and non-server: * amd-pstate not enabled by default * amd-pstate cpufreq policy starting in performance mode vs power-save? This series adjusts the first for at least the newer parts, but I would like to ask does it make sense to also evaluating changing the default policy to powersave as a follow up, or should this policy delta remain?
On 10/22/2024 00:11, Gautham R. Shenoy wrote: > Hello Mario, > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 08:05:17AM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote: >> On 10/21/2024 05:18, Gautham R. Shenoy wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> This patchset contains two patches to >>> >>> * Prevent frequency throttling on power-limited systems with >>> amd-pstate active mode with performance governor. >>> >>> * Make amd_pstate default on EPYC Family 1A+. Based on tests, the >>> amd-pstate driver performs well enough on EPYC. >>> >>> These patches are based on the "linux-next" branch of >>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/superm1/linux.git >>> >>> Gautham R. Shenoy (1): >>> amd-pstate: Set min_perf to nominal_perf for active mode performance >>> gov >>> >>> Swapnil Sapkal (1): >>> amd-pstate: Switch to amd-pstate by default on some Server platforms >>> >>> drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c | 6 +++--- >>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >>> >> >> Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com> >> > > Thank you! > >> I'll queue this up for 6.13. >> >> There were previously two differences for server and non-server: >> * amd-pstate not enabled by default >> * amd-pstate cpufreq policy starting in performance mode vs power-save? >> >> This series adjusts the first for at least the newer parts, but I would like >> to ask does it make sense to also evaluating changing the default policy to >> powersave as a follow up, or should this policy delta remain? > > We would like to retain the policy delta for now and retain > CPUFREQ_POLICY_PERFORMANCE as the default on servers. > Ack, thanks.
Hello, This patchset contains two patches to * Prevent frequency throttling on power-limited systems with amd-pstate active mode with performance governor. * Make amd_pstate default on EPYC Family 1A+. Based on tests, the amd-pstate driver performs well enough on EPYC. These patches are based on the "linux-next" branch of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/superm1/linux.git Gautham R. Shenoy (1): amd-pstate: Set min_perf to nominal_perf for active mode performance gov Swapnil Sapkal (1): amd-pstate: Switch to amd-pstate by default on some Server platforms drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)