Message ID | 20241011121757.2267336-1-quic_msavaliy@quicinc.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | [v2] i2c: i2c-qcom-geni: Serve transfer during early resume stage | expand |
On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 05:47:57PM +0530, Mukesh Kumar Savaliya wrote: Your recipients list is broken. Please check go/upstream and adopt b4 to help avoid such mistakes. > pm_runtime_get_sync() function fails during PM early resume and returning > -EACCES because runtime PM for the device is disabled at the early stage > causing i2c transfer to fail. Make changes to serve transfer with forced > resume. > > Few i2c clients like PCI OR touch may request i2c transfers during early > resume stage. In order to serve transfer request do : > This problem description is too generic. I am not aware of any use case upstream where PCI or touch might need to perform i2c transfers during early resume; your commit message should educate me. > 1. Register interrupt with IRQF_EARLY_RESUME and IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flags > to avoid timeout of transfer when IRQ is not enabled during early stage. > 2. Do force resume if pm_runtime_get_sync() is failing after system > suspend when runtime PM is not enabled. > 3. Increment power usage count after forced resume to balance > it against regular runtime suspend. > Please avoid the bullet list form technical description of your patch. > Co-developed-by: Viken Dadhaniya <quic_vdadhani@quicinc.com> > Signed-off-by: Viken Dadhaniya <quic_vdadhani@quicinc.com> > Signed-off-by: Mukesh Kumar Savaliya <quic_msavaliy@quicinc.com> > --- > v1 -> v2: > > - Changed gi2c->se.dev to dev during dev_dbg() calls. > - Addressed review comments from Andi and Bjorn. That's nice, but spell out the changes you're doing so that reviewers now what you did. > - Returned 0 instead garbage inside geni_i2c_force_resume(). > - Added comments explaining forced resume transfer when runtime PM > remains disabled. > > V1 link: https://patches.linaro.org/project/linux-i2c/patch/20240328123743.1713696-1-quic_msavaliy@quicinc.com/ > --- > --- > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----- > 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c > index 212336f724a6..e1207f1a3de3 100644 > --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c > @@ -134,6 +134,8 @@ struct geni_i2c_clk_fld { > u8 t_cycle_cnt; > }; > > +static int geni_i2c_runtime_resume(struct device *dev); > + > /* > * Hardware uses the underlying formula to calculate time periods of > * SCL clock cycle. Firmware uses some additional cycles excluded from the > @@ -675,22 +677,49 @@ static int geni_i2c_fifo_xfer(struct geni_i2c_dev *gi2c, > return num; > } > > +static int geni_i2c_force_resume(struct geni_i2c_dev *gi2c) > +{ > + struct device *dev = gi2c->se.dev; > + int ret; > + > + ret = geni_i2c_runtime_resume(dev); Wouldn't pm_runtime_force_resume() help you do what you're looking for? > + if (ret) { > + dev_err(gi2c->se.dev, "Failed to enable SE resources: %d\n", ret); > + pm_runtime_put_noidle(dev); > + pm_runtime_set_suspended(dev); > + return ret; > + } > + pm_runtime_get_noresume(dev); > + pm_runtime_set_active(dev); > + return 0; > +} > + > static int geni_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, > struct i2c_msg msgs[], > int num) > { > struct geni_i2c_dev *gi2c = i2c_get_adapdata(adap); > + struct device *dev = gi2c->se.dev; > int ret; > > gi2c->err = 0; > reinit_completion(&gi2c->done); > - ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(gi2c->se.dev); > - if (ret < 0) { > - dev_err(gi2c->se.dev, "error turning SE resources:%d\n", ret); > - pm_runtime_put_noidle(gi2c->se.dev); > - /* Set device in suspended since resume failed */ > - pm_runtime_set_suspended(gi2c->se.dev); > - return ret; > + > + /* Serve I2C transfer by forced resume whether Runtime PM is enbled or not */ > + if (!pm_runtime_enabled(dev) && gi2c->suspended) { > + dev_dbg(dev, "Runtime PM is disabled hence force resume, pm_usage_count: %d\n", > + atomic_read(&dev->power.usage_count)); > + ret = geni_i2c_force_resume(gi2c); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + } else { > + ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(dev); > + if (ret == -EACCES && gi2c->suspended) { > + dev_dbg(dev, "pm_runtime_get_sync() failed-%d, force resume\n", ret); > + ret = geni_i2c_force_resume(gi2c); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + } > } > > qcom_geni_i2c_conf(gi2c); > @@ -700,8 +729,19 @@ static int geni_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, > else > ret = geni_i2c_fifo_xfer(gi2c, msgs, num); > > - pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(gi2c->se.dev); > - pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(gi2c->se.dev); > + /* Does Opposite to Forced Resume when runtime PM was not enabled and served > + * Transfer via forced resume. Please polish this comment. Regards, Bjorn > + */ > + if (!pm_runtime_enabled(dev) && !gi2c->suspended) { > + pm_runtime_put_noidle(dev); > + pm_runtime_set_suspended(dev); > + /* Reset flag same as runtime suspend, next xfer PM can be enabled */ > + gi2c->suspended = 0; > + } else { > + pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(gi2c->se.dev); > + pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(gi2c->se.dev); > + } > + > gi2c->cur = NULL; > gi2c->err = 0; > return ret; > @@ -818,7 +858,8 @@ static int geni_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > init_completion(&gi2c->done); > spin_lock_init(&gi2c->lock); > platform_set_drvdata(pdev, gi2c); > - ret = devm_request_irq(dev, gi2c->irq, geni_i2c_irq, IRQF_NO_AUTOEN, > + ret = devm_request_irq(dev, gi2c->irq, geni_i2c_irq, > + IRQF_NO_AUTOEN | IRQF_EARLY_RESUME | IRQF_NO_SUSPEND, > dev_name(dev), gi2c); > if (ret) { > dev_err(dev, "Request_irq failed:%d: err:%d\n", > -- > 2.25.1 >
Hi Mukesh, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on v6.12-rc2] [also build test ERROR on linus/master] [cannot apply to andi-shyti/i2c/i2c-host next-20241011] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Mukesh-Kumar-Savaliya/i2c-i2c-qcom-geni-Serve-transfer-during-early-resume-stage/20241011-202013 base: v6.12-rc2 patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241011121757.2267336-1-quic_msavaliy%40quicinc.com patch subject: [PATCH v2] i2c: i2c-qcom-geni: Serve transfer during early resume stage config: i386-buildonly-randconfig-001-20241013 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241013/202410132130.a2tOwnm4-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 18.1.8 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 3b5b5c1ec4a3095ab096dd780e84d7ab81f3d7ff) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241013/202410132130.a2tOwnm4-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410132130.a2tOwnm4-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): >> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c:711:28: error: no member named 'usage_count' in 'struct dev_pm_info' 711 | atomic_read(&dev->power.usage_count)); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/linux/dev_printk.h:165:39: note: expanded from macro 'dev_dbg' 165 | dynamic_dev_dbg(dev, dev_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__) | ^~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/dynamic_debug.h:274:19: note: expanded from macro 'dynamic_dev_dbg' 274 | dev, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__) | ^~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/dynamic_debug.h:250:59: note: expanded from macro '_dynamic_func_call' 250 | _dynamic_func_call_cls(_DPRINTK_CLASS_DFLT, fmt, func, ##__VA_ARGS__) | ^~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/dynamic_debug.h:248:65: note: expanded from macro '_dynamic_func_call_cls' 248 | __dynamic_func_call_cls(__UNIQUE_ID(ddebug), cls, fmt, func, ##__VA_ARGS__) | ^~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/dynamic_debug.h:224:15: note: expanded from macro '__dynamic_func_call_cls' 224 | func(&id, ##__VA_ARGS__); \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ 1 error generated. vim +711 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c 696 697 static int geni_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, 698 struct i2c_msg msgs[], 699 int num) 700 { 701 struct geni_i2c_dev *gi2c = i2c_get_adapdata(adap); 702 struct device *dev = gi2c->se.dev; 703 int ret; 704 705 gi2c->err = 0; 706 reinit_completion(&gi2c->done); 707 708 /* Serve I2C transfer by forced resume whether Runtime PM is enbled or not */ 709 if (!pm_runtime_enabled(dev) && gi2c->suspended) { 710 dev_dbg(dev, "Runtime PM is disabled hence force resume, pm_usage_count: %d\n", > 711 atomic_read(&dev->power.usage_count)); 712 ret = geni_i2c_force_resume(gi2c); 713 if (ret) 714 return ret; 715 } else { 716 ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(dev); 717 if (ret == -EACCES && gi2c->suspended) { 718 dev_dbg(dev, "pm_runtime_get_sync() failed-%d, force resume\n", ret); 719 ret = geni_i2c_force_resume(gi2c); 720 if (ret) 721 return ret; 722 } 723 } 724 725 qcom_geni_i2c_conf(gi2c); 726 727 if (gi2c->gpi_mode) 728 ret = geni_i2c_gpi_xfer(gi2c, msgs, num); 729 else 730 ret = geni_i2c_fifo_xfer(gi2c, msgs, num); 731 732 /* Does Opposite to Forced Resume when runtime PM was not enabled and served 733 * Transfer via forced resume. 734 */ 735 if (!pm_runtime_enabled(dev) && !gi2c->suspended) { 736 pm_runtime_put_noidle(dev); 737 pm_runtime_set_suspended(dev); 738 /* Reset flag same as runtime suspend, next xfer PM can be enabled */ 739 gi2c->suspended = 0; 740 } else { 741 pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(gi2c->se.dev); 742 pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(gi2c->se.dev); 743 } 744 745 gi2c->cur = NULL; 746 gi2c->err = 0; 747 return ret; 748 } 749
Hi Mukesh, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on v6.12-rc2] [also build test ERROR on linus/master] [cannot apply to andi-shyti/i2c/i2c-host next-20241011] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Mukesh-Kumar-Savaliya/i2c-i2c-qcom-geni-Serve-transfer-during-early-resume-stage/20241011-202013 base: v6.12-rc2 patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241011121757.2267336-1-quic_msavaliy%40quicinc.com patch subject: [PATCH v2] i2c: i2c-qcom-geni: Serve transfer during early resume stage config: arc-randconfig-001-20241013 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241013/202410132233.P25W2vKq-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: arc-elf-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241013/202410132233.P25W2vKq-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410132233.P25W2vKq-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from include/linux/device.h:15, from include/linux/acpi.h:14, from drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c:4: drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c: In function 'geni_i2c_xfer': >> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c:711:48: error: 'struct dev_pm_info' has no member named 'usage_count' 711 | atomic_read(&dev->power.usage_count)); | ^ include/linux/dev_printk.h:129:48: note: in definition of macro 'dev_printk' 129 | _dev_printk(level, dev, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c:710:17: note: in expansion of macro 'dev_dbg' 710 | dev_dbg(dev, "Runtime PM is disabled hence force resume, pm_usage_count: %d\n", | ^~~~~~~ vim +711 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c 696 697 static int geni_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, 698 struct i2c_msg msgs[], 699 int num) 700 { 701 struct geni_i2c_dev *gi2c = i2c_get_adapdata(adap); 702 struct device *dev = gi2c->se.dev; 703 int ret; 704 705 gi2c->err = 0; 706 reinit_completion(&gi2c->done); 707 708 /* Serve I2C transfer by forced resume whether Runtime PM is enbled or not */ 709 if (!pm_runtime_enabled(dev) && gi2c->suspended) { 710 dev_dbg(dev, "Runtime PM is disabled hence force resume, pm_usage_count: %d\n", > 711 atomic_read(&dev->power.usage_count)); 712 ret = geni_i2c_force_resume(gi2c); 713 if (ret) 714 return ret; 715 } else { 716 ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(dev); 717 if (ret == -EACCES && gi2c->suspended) { 718 dev_dbg(dev, "pm_runtime_get_sync() failed-%d, force resume\n", ret); 719 ret = geni_i2c_force_resume(gi2c); 720 if (ret) 721 return ret; 722 } 723 } 724 725 qcom_geni_i2c_conf(gi2c); 726 727 if (gi2c->gpi_mode) 728 ret = geni_i2c_gpi_xfer(gi2c, msgs, num); 729 else 730 ret = geni_i2c_fifo_xfer(gi2c, msgs, num); 731 732 /* Does Opposite to Forced Resume when runtime PM was not enabled and served 733 * Transfer via forced resume. 734 */ 735 if (!pm_runtime_enabled(dev) && !gi2c->suspended) { 736 pm_runtime_put_noidle(dev); 737 pm_runtime_set_suspended(dev); 738 /* Reset flag same as runtime suspend, next xfer PM can be enabled */ 739 gi2c->suspended = 0; 740 } else { 741 pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(gi2c->se.dev); 742 pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(gi2c->se.dev); 743 } 744 745 gi2c->cur = NULL; 746 gi2c->err = 0; 747 return ret; 748 } 749
Hi Bjorn, thanks for the review. On 10/11/2024 11:28 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 05:47:57PM +0530, Mukesh Kumar Savaliya wrote: > > Your recipients list is broken. Please check go/upstream and adopt b4 to > help avoid such mistakes. > Sorry, My mistake in keeping output of maintainers script separately into --to and --cc which i shouldn't do. >> pm_runtime_get_sync() function fails during PM early resume and returning >> -EACCES because runtime PM for the device is disabled at the early stage >> causing i2c transfer to fail. Make changes to serve transfer with forced >> resume. >> >> Few i2c clients like PCI OR touch may request i2c transfers during early >> resume stage. In order to serve transfer request do : >> > > This problem description is too generic. I am not aware of any use case > upstream where PCI or touch might need to perform i2c transfers during > early resume; your commit message should educate me. > yes, it's generic as of now since we have an internal usecase with PCI is yet to be enabled in upstream. Not tied up with any usecase in upstream, i just heard recently. Provided the scenario is generic and possible by any client, can this code change be reviewed or shall be kept on halt till PCI usecase gets enabled ? >> 1. Register interrupt with IRQF_EARLY_RESUME and IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flags >> to avoid timeout of transfer when IRQ is not enabled during early stage. >> 2. Do force resume if pm_runtime_get_sync() is failing after system >> suspend when runtime PM is not enabled. >> 3. Increment power usage count after forced resume to balance >> it against regular runtime suspend. >> > > Please avoid the bullet list form technical description of your patch. > Sure. Made the changes in commit log with free flow writeup. >> Co-developed-by: Viken Dadhaniya <quic_vdadhani@quicinc.com> >> Signed-off-by: Viken Dadhaniya <quic_vdadhani@quicinc.com> >> Signed-off-by: Mukesh Kumar Savaliya <quic_msavaliy@quicinc.com> >> --- >> v1 -> v2: >> >> - Changed gi2c->se.dev to dev during dev_dbg() calls. >> - Addressed review comments from Andi and Bjorn. > > That's nice, but spell out the changes you're doing so that reviewers > now what you did. Sure, changes done are also listed but i will add reviewers name per change. > >> - Returned 0 instead garbage inside geni_i2c_force_resume(). >> - Added comments explaining forced resume transfer when runtime PM >> remains disabled. >> >> V1 link: https://patches.linaro.org/project/linux-i2c/patch/20240328123743.1713696-1-quic_msavaliy@quicinc.com/ >> --- >> --- >> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----- >> 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c >> index 212336f724a6..e1207f1a3de3 100644 >> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c >> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c >> @@ -134,6 +134,8 @@ struct geni_i2c_clk_fld { >> u8 t_cycle_cnt; >> }; >> >> +static int geni_i2c_runtime_resume(struct device *dev); >> + >> /* >> * Hardware uses the underlying formula to calculate time periods of >> * SCL clock cycle. Firmware uses some additional cycles excluded from the >> @@ -675,22 +677,49 @@ static int geni_i2c_fifo_xfer(struct geni_i2c_dev *gi2c, >> return num; >> } >> >> +static int geni_i2c_force_resume(struct geni_i2c_dev *gi2c) >> +{ >> + struct device *dev = gi2c->se.dev; >> + int ret; >> + >> + ret = geni_i2c_runtime_resume(dev); > > Wouldn't pm_runtime_force_resume() help you do what you're looking for? > Yes, i have reviewed and seems this API can also serve the same purpose. Made the changes accordingly. >> + if (ret) { >> + dev_err(gi2c->se.dev, "Failed to enable SE resources: %d\n", ret); >> + pm_runtime_put_noidle(dev); >> + pm_runtime_set_suspended(dev); >> + return ret; >> + } >> + pm_runtime_get_noresume(dev); >> + pm_runtime_set_active(dev); >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> static int geni_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, >> struct i2c_msg msgs[], >> int num) >> { >> struct geni_i2c_dev *gi2c = i2c_get_adapdata(adap); >> + struct device *dev = gi2c->se.dev; >> int ret; >> >> gi2c->err = 0; >> reinit_completion(&gi2c->done); >> - ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(gi2c->se.dev); >> - if (ret < 0) { >> - dev_err(gi2c->se.dev, "error turning SE resources:%d\n", ret); >> - pm_runtime_put_noidle(gi2c->se.dev); >> - /* Set device in suspended since resume failed */ >> - pm_runtime_set_suspended(gi2c->se.dev); >> - return ret; >> + >> + /* Serve I2C transfer by forced resume whether Runtime PM is enbled or not */ >> + if (!pm_runtime_enabled(dev) && gi2c->suspended) { >> + dev_dbg(dev, "Runtime PM is disabled hence force resume, pm_usage_count: %d\n", >> + atomic_read(&dev->power.usage_count)); >> + ret = geni_i2c_force_resume(gi2c); >> + if (ret) >> + return ret; >> + } else { >> + ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(dev); >> + if (ret == -EACCES && gi2c->suspended) { >> + dev_dbg(dev, "pm_runtime_get_sync() failed-%d, force resume\n", ret); >> + ret = geni_i2c_force_resume(gi2c); >> + if (ret) >> + return ret; >> + } >> } >> >> qcom_geni_i2c_conf(gi2c); >> @@ -700,8 +729,19 @@ static int geni_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, >> else >> ret = geni_i2c_fifo_xfer(gi2c, msgs, num); >> >> - pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(gi2c->se.dev); >> - pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(gi2c->se.dev); >> + /* Does Opposite to Forced Resume when runtime PM was not enabled and served >> + * Transfer via forced resume. > > Please polish this comment. Sure, Enhanced my comments. Thanks. > > Regards, > Bjorn > >> + */ >> + if (!pm_runtime_enabled(dev) && !gi2c->suspended) { >> + pm_runtime_put_noidle(dev); >> + pm_runtime_set_suspended(dev); >> + /* Reset flag same as runtime suspend, next xfer PM can be enabled */ >> + gi2c->suspended = 0; >> + } else { >> + pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(gi2c->se.dev); >> + pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(gi2c->se.dev); >> + } >> + >> gi2c->cur = NULL; >> gi2c->err = 0; >> return ret; >> @@ -818,7 +858,8 @@ static int geni_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> init_completion(&gi2c->done); >> spin_lock_init(&gi2c->lock); >> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, gi2c); >> - ret = devm_request_irq(dev, gi2c->irq, geni_i2c_irq, IRQF_NO_AUTOEN, >> + ret = devm_request_irq(dev, gi2c->irq, geni_i2c_irq, >> + IRQF_NO_AUTOEN | IRQF_EARLY_RESUME | IRQF_NO_SUSPEND, >> dev_name(dev), gi2c); >> if (ret) { >> dev_err(dev, "Request_irq failed:%d: err:%d\n", >> -- >> 2.25.1 >>
On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 8:29 AM Mukesh Kumar Savaliya <quic_msavaliy@quicinc.com> wrote: > On 10/11/2024 11:28 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 05:47:57PM +0530, Mukesh Kumar Savaliya wrote: [..] > >> pm_runtime_get_sync() function fails during PM early resume and returning > >> -EACCES because runtime PM for the device is disabled at the early stage > >> causing i2c transfer to fail. Make changes to serve transfer with forced > >> resume. > >> > >> Few i2c clients like PCI OR touch may request i2c transfers during early > >> resume stage. In order to serve transfer request do : > >> > > > > This problem description is too generic. I am not aware of any use case > > upstream where PCI or touch might need to perform i2c transfers during > > early resume; your commit message should educate me. > > > yes, it's generic as of now since we have an internal usecase with PCI > is yet to be enabled in upstream. Not tied up with any usecase in > upstream, i just heard recently. > > Provided the scenario is generic and possible by any client, can this > code change be reviewed or shall be kept on halt till PCI usecase gets > enabled ? > If this is a valid scenario in the upstream kernel, yes. If it solves a problem only manifesting itself based on a downstream design then you need to exactly describe that scenario so that reviewers can decide if this is a problem with the upstream kernel or your downstream design. Regards, Bjonr
Thanks Bjorn. On 11/19/2024 8:29 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 8:29 AM Mukesh Kumar Savaliya > <quic_msavaliy@quicinc.com> wrote: >> On 10/11/2024 11:28 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote: >>> On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 05:47:57PM +0530, Mukesh Kumar Savaliya wrote: > [..] >>>> pm_runtime_get_sync() function fails during PM early resume and returning >>>> -EACCES because runtime PM for the device is disabled at the early stage >>>> causing i2c transfer to fail. Make changes to serve transfer with forced >>>> resume. >>>> >>>> Few i2c clients like PCI OR touch may request i2c transfers during early >>>> resume stage. In order to serve transfer request do : >>>> >>> >>> This problem description is too generic. I am not aware of any use case >>> upstream where PCI or touch might need to perform i2c transfers during >>> early resume; your commit message should educate me. >>> >> yes, it's generic as of now since we have an internal usecase with PCI >> is yet to be enabled in upstream. Not tied up with any usecase in >> upstream, i just heard recently. >> >> Provided the scenario is generic and possible by any client, can this >> code change be reviewed or shall be kept on halt till PCI usecase gets >> enabled ? >> > > If this is a valid scenario in the upstream kernel, yes. If it solves > a problem only manifesting itself based on a downstream design then > you need to exactly describe that scenario so that reviewers can > decide if this is a problem with the upstream kernel or your > downstream design. > The exact scenario from PCIe switch is as below. Hope it describes the usecase at high level to understand PCIe client -> PCIe Driver -> I2C driver. PCIe switch needs certain configurations through i2c after powering on the switch, as part of suspend we are using suspend_noirq() to turn off the switch because some PCIe clients do some transfers till suspend_noirq() phase. And as part of resume_noirq(), we will enable the power to the switch and configures the switch again through i2c. > Regards, > Bjonr >
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c index 212336f724a6..e1207f1a3de3 100644 --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c @@ -134,6 +134,8 @@ struct geni_i2c_clk_fld { u8 t_cycle_cnt; }; +static int geni_i2c_runtime_resume(struct device *dev); + /* * Hardware uses the underlying formula to calculate time periods of * SCL clock cycle. Firmware uses some additional cycles excluded from the @@ -675,22 +677,49 @@ static int geni_i2c_fifo_xfer(struct geni_i2c_dev *gi2c, return num; } +static int geni_i2c_force_resume(struct geni_i2c_dev *gi2c) +{ + struct device *dev = gi2c->se.dev; + int ret; + + ret = geni_i2c_runtime_resume(dev); + if (ret) { + dev_err(gi2c->se.dev, "Failed to enable SE resources: %d\n", ret); + pm_runtime_put_noidle(dev); + pm_runtime_set_suspended(dev); + return ret; + } + pm_runtime_get_noresume(dev); + pm_runtime_set_active(dev); + return 0; +} + static int geni_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_msg msgs[], int num) { struct geni_i2c_dev *gi2c = i2c_get_adapdata(adap); + struct device *dev = gi2c->se.dev; int ret; gi2c->err = 0; reinit_completion(&gi2c->done); - ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(gi2c->se.dev); - if (ret < 0) { - dev_err(gi2c->se.dev, "error turning SE resources:%d\n", ret); - pm_runtime_put_noidle(gi2c->se.dev); - /* Set device in suspended since resume failed */ - pm_runtime_set_suspended(gi2c->se.dev); - return ret; + + /* Serve I2C transfer by forced resume whether Runtime PM is enbled or not */ + if (!pm_runtime_enabled(dev) && gi2c->suspended) { + dev_dbg(dev, "Runtime PM is disabled hence force resume, pm_usage_count: %d\n", + atomic_read(&dev->power.usage_count)); + ret = geni_i2c_force_resume(gi2c); + if (ret) + return ret; + } else { + ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(dev); + if (ret == -EACCES && gi2c->suspended) { + dev_dbg(dev, "pm_runtime_get_sync() failed-%d, force resume\n", ret); + ret = geni_i2c_force_resume(gi2c); + if (ret) + return ret; + } } qcom_geni_i2c_conf(gi2c); @@ -700,8 +729,19 @@ static int geni_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, else ret = geni_i2c_fifo_xfer(gi2c, msgs, num); - pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(gi2c->se.dev); - pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(gi2c->se.dev); + /* Does Opposite to Forced Resume when runtime PM was not enabled and served + * Transfer via forced resume. + */ + if (!pm_runtime_enabled(dev) && !gi2c->suspended) { + pm_runtime_put_noidle(dev); + pm_runtime_set_suspended(dev); + /* Reset flag same as runtime suspend, next xfer PM can be enabled */ + gi2c->suspended = 0; + } else { + pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(gi2c->se.dev); + pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(gi2c->se.dev); + } + gi2c->cur = NULL; gi2c->err = 0; return ret; @@ -818,7 +858,8 @@ static int geni_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) init_completion(&gi2c->done); spin_lock_init(&gi2c->lock); platform_set_drvdata(pdev, gi2c); - ret = devm_request_irq(dev, gi2c->irq, geni_i2c_irq, IRQF_NO_AUTOEN, + ret = devm_request_irq(dev, gi2c->irq, geni_i2c_irq, + IRQF_NO_AUTOEN | IRQF_EARLY_RESUME | IRQF_NO_SUSPEND, dev_name(dev), gi2c); if (ret) { dev_err(dev, "Request_irq failed:%d: err:%d\n",