| Message ID | 20241205-const_dfc_done-v3-8-1611f1486b5a@quicinc.com |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Headers | show |
| Series | driver core: Constify API device_find_child() | expand |
On Thu, Dec 05, 2024 at 08:10:17AM +0800, Zijun Hu wrote: > From: Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@quicinc.com> > > gpio_sim_dev_match_fwnode() is a simple wrapper of device_match_fwnode() > Remvoe the unnecessary wrapper. > > Signed-off-by: Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@quicinc.com> > --- > drivers/gpio/gpio-sim.c | 7 +------ I think if you move this patch before patch #4 in your series, you only have to touch this file once. Best regards Uwe
On 12/5/2024 4:10 PM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > On Thu, Dec 05, 2024 at 08:10:17AM +0800, Zijun Hu wrote: >> From: Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@quicinc.com> >> >> gpio_sim_dev_match_fwnode() is a simple wrapper of device_match_fwnode() >> Remvoe the unnecessary wrapper. >> >> Signed-off-by: Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@quicinc.com> >> --- >> drivers/gpio/gpio-sim.c | 7 +------ > > I think if you move this patch before patch #4 in your series, you only > have to touch this file once. the precondition of this change is patch #4, it will have building error if moving it before #4. actually, we can only do simplifications with benefits brought by #4. > > Best regards > Uwe
On 2024/12/5 18:37, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > On Thu, Dec 05, 2024 at 04:37:08PM +0800, quic_zijuhu wrote: >> On 12/5/2024 4:10 PM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: >>> On Thu, Dec 05, 2024 at 08:10:17AM +0800, Zijun Hu wrote: >>>> From: Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@quicinc.com> >>>> >>>> gpio_sim_dev_match_fwnode() is a simple wrapper of device_match_fwnode() >>>> Remvoe the unnecessary wrapper. > > Just spotted: s/Remvoe/Remove/ > this typo error is my mistake, will correct it. >>>> Signed-off-by: Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@quicinc.com> >>>> --- >>>> drivers/gpio/gpio-sim.c | 7 +------ >>> >>> I think if you move this patch before patch #4 in your series, you only >>> have to touch this file once. >> >> the precondition of this change is patch #4, it will have building error >> if moving it before #4. >> >> actually, we can only do simplifications with benefits brought by #4. > > Ah I see. I thought that device_match_fwnode only got the const for the > 2nd parameter in patch #4. > > Best regards > Uwe
On 2024/12/6 00:24, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > On Thu, Dec 5, 2024 at 1:15 AM Zijun Hu <zijun_hu@icloud.com> wrote: >> >> From: Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@quicinc.com> >> >> gpio_sim_dev_match_fwnode() is a simple wrapper of device_match_fwnode() >> Remvoe the unnecessary wrapper. >> >> Signed-off-by: Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@quicinc.com> >> --- >> drivers/gpio/gpio-sim.c | 7 +------ >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-sim.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-sim.c >> index 370b71513bdb529112e157fa22a5451e02502a17..b1f33cbaaaa78aca324f99c45a868e7e79a9d672 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-sim.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-sim.c >> @@ -413,11 +413,6 @@ static int gpio_sim_setup_sysfs(struct gpio_sim_chip *chip) >> return devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, gpio_sim_sysfs_remove, chip); >> } >> >> -static int gpio_sim_dev_match_fwnode(struct device *dev, const void *data) >> -{ >> - return device_match_fwnode(dev, data); >> -} >> - >> static int gpio_sim_add_bank(struct fwnode_handle *swnode, struct device *dev) >> { >> struct gpio_sim_chip *chip; >> @@ -503,7 +498,7 @@ static int gpio_sim_add_bank(struct fwnode_handle *swnode, struct device *dev) >> if (ret) >> return ret; >> >> - chip->dev = device_find_child(dev, swnode, gpio_sim_dev_match_fwnode); >> + chip->dev = device_find_child(dev, swnode, device_match_fwnode); >> if (!chip->dev) >> return -ENODEV; >> >> >> -- >> 2.34.1 >> >> > > Please use get_maintainers.pl to get the complete list of addresses to Cc. thanks for code review. will fix it in v4. > > Bartosz
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-sim.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-sim.c index 370b71513bdb529112e157fa22a5451e02502a17..b1f33cbaaaa78aca324f99c45a868e7e79a9d672 100644 --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-sim.c +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-sim.c @@ -413,11 +413,6 @@ static int gpio_sim_setup_sysfs(struct gpio_sim_chip *chip) return devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, gpio_sim_sysfs_remove, chip); } -static int gpio_sim_dev_match_fwnode(struct device *dev, const void *data) -{ - return device_match_fwnode(dev, data); -} - static int gpio_sim_add_bank(struct fwnode_handle *swnode, struct device *dev) { struct gpio_sim_chip *chip; @@ -503,7 +498,7 @@ static int gpio_sim_add_bank(struct fwnode_handle *swnode, struct device *dev) if (ret) return ret; - chip->dev = device_find_child(dev, swnode, gpio_sim_dev_match_fwnode); + chip->dev = device_find_child(dev, swnode, device_match_fwnode); if (!chip->dev) return -ENODEV;