Message ID | 20250102113019.1347068-1-quic_varada@quicinc.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Add PCIe support for Qualcomm IPQ5332 | expand |
On Thu, Jan 02, 2025 at 05:00:15PM +0530, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote: > + "#phy-cells": > + const: 0 > + > + "#clock-cells": > + const: 0 > + > + num-lanes: true $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32 enum: or this should be moved to some shared schema. > + > +required: > + - compatible > + - reg > + - clocks > + - resets > + - "#phy-cells" > + - "#clock-cells" num-lanes should be required. How does it work without it? There is no default. Best regards, Krzysztof
On Thu, Jan 02, 2025 at 05:00:17PM +0530, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote: > Document the PCIe controller on IPQ5332 platform. > > Signed-off-by: Varadarajan Narayanan <quic_varada@quicinc.com> > --- > v5: Re-arrange 5332 and 9574 compatibles to handle fallback usage in dts What? How this is related to commit msg? > > v4: * v3 reused ipq9574 bindings for ipq5332. Instead add one for ipq5332 > * DTS uses ipq9574 compatible as fallback. Hence move ipq9574 to be able > to use the 'reg' section for both ipq5332 and ipq9574. Else, dtbs_check > and dt_binding_check flag errors. > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie.yaml | 10 ++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie.yaml > index bd87f6b49d68..9f37eca1ce0d 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie.yaml > @@ -26,7 +26,6 @@ properties: > - qcom,pcie-ipq8064-v2 > - qcom,pcie-ipq8074 > - qcom,pcie-ipq8074-gen3 > - - qcom,pcie-ipq9574 I don't understand this change at all and your commit msg explains here nothing. Best regards, Krzysztof
On Fri, Jan 03, 2025 at 08:45:14AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On Thu, Jan 02, 2025 at 05:00:17PM +0530, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote: > > Document the PCIe controller on IPQ5332 platform. > > > > Signed-off-by: Varadarajan Narayanan <quic_varada@quicinc.com> > > --- > > v5: Re-arrange 5332 and 9574 compatibles to handle fallback usage in dts > > What? How this is related to commit msg? > > > > > v4: * v3 reused ipq9574 bindings for ipq5332. Instead add one for ipq5332 > > * DTS uses ipq9574 compatible as fallback. Hence move ipq9574 to be able > > to use the 'reg' section for both ipq5332 and ipq9574. Else, dtbs_check > > and dt_binding_check flag errors. > > --- > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie.yaml | 10 ++++++++-- > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie.yaml > > index bd87f6b49d68..9f37eca1ce0d 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie.yaml > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie.yaml > > @@ -26,7 +26,6 @@ properties: > > - qcom,pcie-ipq8064-v2 > > - qcom,pcie-ipq8074 > > - qcom,pcie-ipq8074-gen3 > > - - qcom,pcie-ipq9574 > > I don't understand this change at all and your commit msg explains > here nothing. All DT entries except "reg" is similar between ipq5332 and ipq9574. ipq9574 has 5 registers while ipq5332 has 6. MHI is the additional (i.e. sixth) entry for ipq5332. If ipq9574 is not removed from here, dt_binding_check gives the following errors 1. /local/mnt/workspace/varada/upstream/pci-v6/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5332-rdp474.dtb: pcie@18000000: reg: [[557056, 12288], [402653184, 3869], [402657056, 168], [402657280, 4096], [403701760, 4096], [569344, 4096]] is too long Failed validating 'maxItems' in schema['allOf'][2]['then']['properties']['reg']: {'maxItems': 5, 'minItems': 5} 2. /local/mnt/workspace/varada/upstream/pci-v6/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5332-rdp474.dtb: pcie@18000000: reg-names: ['parf', 'dbi', 'elbi', 'atu', 'config', 'mhi'] is too long Failed validating 'maxItems' in schema['allOf'][2]['then']['properties']['reg-names']: {'items': [{'const': 'dbi'}, {'const': 'elbi'}, {'const': 'atu'}, {'const': 'parf'}, {'const': 'config'}], 'maxItems': 5, 'minItems': 5, 'type': 'array'} Hence had to remove it from here and add it to the sdx55 reg definition. Will capture this in the commit message. Thanks Varada