Message ID | 20250125182425.59708-3-philmd@linaro.org |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | qemu/timer: Clarify QEMUTimer new/free API | expand |
On Sat, Jan 25, 2025 at 07:24:25PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > Ensure we are not re-initializing a QEMUTimer already added > to an active list. timer_init*() functions expect either > a recently created and zeroed QEMUTimer, or one previously > free'd with timer_free(). > > Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> > --- > include/qemu/timer.h | 2 +- > util/qemu-timer.c | 1 + > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> With regards, Daniel
25.01.2025 21:24, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > - * You need not call an explicit deinit call. Simply make > + * You need not call an explicit timer_deinit() call. Simply make > * sure it is not on a list with timer_del. Reworded this as "You need not call timer_deinit() explicitly. Simply make..." and applied to trivial-patches tree. Thanks, /mjt
09.02.2025 12:37, Michael Tokarev wrote: > 25.01.2025 21:24, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > >> - * You need not call an explicit deinit call. Simply make >> + * You need not call an explicit timer_deinit() call. Simply make >> * sure it is not on a list with timer_del. > > Reworded this as "You need not call timer_deinit() explicitly. Simply make..." "You don't need to call timer_deinit() explicitly.", actually. This breaks quite a lot of CI tests: https://gitlab.com/mjt0k/qemu/-/pipelines/1662551717
On 9/2/25 10:41, Michael Tokarev wrote: > 09.02.2025 12:37, Michael Tokarev wrote: >> 25.01.2025 21:24, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: >> >>> - * You need not call an explicit deinit call. Simply make >>> + * You need not call an explicit timer_deinit() call. Simply make >>> * sure it is not on a list with timer_del. >> >> Reworded this as "You need not call timer_deinit() explicitly. Simply >> make..." > > "You don't need to call timer_deinit() explicitly.", actually. > > This breaks quite a lot of CI tests: https://gitlab.com/mjt0k/qemu/-/ > pipelines/1662551717 Do sorry, I only tested on a specific config and missed all the other errors :/
diff --git a/include/qemu/timer.h b/include/qemu/timer.h index abd2204f3be..4717693f950 100644 --- a/include/qemu/timer.h +++ b/include/qemu/timer.h @@ -407,7 +407,7 @@ int64_t timerlistgroup_deadline_ns(QEMUTimerListGroup *tlg); * (or default timer list group, if NULL). * The caller is responsible for allocating the memory. * - * You need not call an explicit deinit call. Simply make + * You need not call an explicit timer_deinit() call. Simply make * sure it is not on a list with timer_del. */ void timer_init_full(QEMUTimer *ts, diff --git a/util/qemu-timer.c b/util/qemu-timer.c index 0e8a453eaa1..058cae6e487 100644 --- a/util/qemu-timer.c +++ b/util/qemu-timer.c @@ -354,6 +354,7 @@ void timer_init_full(QEMUTimer *ts, if (!timer_list_group) { timer_list_group = &main_loop_tlg; } + assert(ts->timer_list == NULL); ts->timer_list = timer_list_group->tl[type]; ts->cb = cb; ts->opaque = opaque;
Ensure we are not re-initializing a QEMUTimer already added to an active list. timer_init*() functions expect either a recently created and zeroed QEMUTimer, or one previously free'd with timer_free(). Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> --- include/qemu/timer.h | 2 +- util/qemu-timer.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)