@@ -6267,10 +6267,10 @@ pick_next_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf
int new_tasks;
again:
-#ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
if (!cfs_rq->nr_running)
goto idle;
+#ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
if (prev->sched_class != &fair_sched_class)
goto simple;
@@ -6300,11 +6300,17 @@ pick_next_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf
/*
* This call to check_cfs_rq_runtime() will do the
* throttle and dequeue its entity in the parent(s).
- * Therefore the 'simple' nr_running test will indeed
+ * Therefore the nr_running test will indeed
* be correct.
*/
- if (unlikely(check_cfs_rq_runtime(cfs_rq)))
+ if (unlikely(check_cfs_rq_runtime(cfs_rq))) {
+ cfs_rq = &rq->cfs;
+
+ if (!cfs_rq->nr_running)
+ goto idle;
+
goto simple;
+ }
}
se = pick_next_entity(cfs_rq, curr);
@@ -6344,12 +6350,8 @@ pick_next_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf
return p;
simple:
- cfs_rq = &rq->cfs;
#endif
- if (!cfs_rq->nr_running)
- goto idle;
-
put_prev_task(rq, prev);
do {
Rearrange pick_next_task_fair() a bit to avoid checking cfs_rq->nr_running twice for the case where FAIR_GROUP_SCHED is enabled and the previous task doesn't belong to the fair class. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> --- kernel/sched/fair.c | 16 +++++++++------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) -- 2.13.0.70.g6367777092d9