| Message ID | 20161116152047.3336967-1-arnd@arndb.de |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Commit | f0e8faa7a5e894b0fc99d24be1b18685a92ea466 |
| Headers | show |
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-ux500/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-ux500/pm.c index 8538910db202..a970e7fcba9e 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-ux500/pm.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-ux500/pm.c @@ -134,8 +134,8 @@ bool prcmu_pending_irq(void) */ bool prcmu_is_cpu_in_wfi(int cpu) { - return readl(PRCM_ARM_WFI_STANDBY) & cpu ? PRCM_ARM_WFI_STANDBY_WFI1 : - PRCM_ARM_WFI_STANDBY_WFI0; + return readl(PRCM_ARM_WFI_STANDBY) & + (cpu ? PRCM_ARM_WFI_STANDBY_WFI1 : PRCM_ARM_WFI_STANDBY_WFI0); } /*
This function clearly never worked and always returns true, as pointed out by gcc-7: arch/arm/mach-ux500/pm.c: In function 'prcmu_is_cpu_in_wfi': arch/arm/mach-ux500/pm.c:137:212: error: ?: using integer constants in boolean context, the expression will always evaluate to 'true' [-Werror=int-in-bool-context] With the added braces, the condition actually makes sense. Fixes: 34fe6f107eab ("mfd : Check if the other db8500 core is in WFI") Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> --- arch/arm/mach-ux500/pm.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) -- 2.9.0