| Message ID | 20161116150855.3083872-1-arnd@arndb.de |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Commit | af15769ffab13d777e55fdef09d0762bf0c249c4 |
| Headers | show |
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/mvsas/mv_94xx.c b/drivers/scsi/mvsas/mv_94xx.c index 4c57d9abce7b..7de5d8d75480 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/mvsas/mv_94xx.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/mvsas/mv_94xx.c @@ -668,7 +668,7 @@ static void mvs_94xx_command_active(struct mvs_info *mvi, u32 slot_idx) { u32 tmp; tmp = mvs_cr32(mvi, MVS_COMMAND_ACTIVE+(slot_idx >> 3)); - if (tmp && 1 << (slot_idx % 32)) { + if (tmp & 1 << (slot_idx % 32)) { mv_printk("command active %08X, slot [%x].\n", tmp, slot_idx); mvs_cw32(mvi, MVS_COMMAND_ACTIVE + (slot_idx >> 3), 1 << (slot_idx % 32));
gcc-7 notices that the condition in mvs_94xx_command_active looks suspicious: drivers/scsi/mvsas/mv_94xx.c: In function 'mvs_94xx_command_active': drivers/scsi/mvsas/mv_94xx.c:671:15: error: '<<' in boolean context, did you mean '<' ? [-Werror=int-in-bool-context] This was introduced when the mv_printk() statement got added, and leads to the condition being ignored. This is probably harmless. Changing '&&' to '&' makes the code look reasonable, as we check the command bit before setting and printing it. Fixes: a4632aae8b66 ("[SCSI] mvsas: Add new macros and functions") Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> --- drivers/scsi/mvsas/mv_94xx.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) -- 2.9.0