| Message ID | 20161108135247.2030917-1-arnd@arndb.de |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Commit | a29d126027c781eaa305ecae432bb04d41e198c5 |
| Headers | show |
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr/smu7_hwmgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr/smu7_hwmgr.c index 9e49f2777143..b2d61d043d52 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr/smu7_hwmgr.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr/smu7_hwmgr.c @@ -2147,9 +2147,11 @@ static int smu7_patch_limits_vddc(struct pp_hwmgr *hwmgr, struct smu7_hwmgr *data = (struct smu7_hwmgr *)(hwmgr->backend); if (tab) { + vddc = tab->vddc; smu7_patch_ppt_v0_with_vdd_leakage(hwmgr, &vddc, &data->vddc_leakage); tab->vddc = vddc; + vddci = tab->vddci; smu7_patch_ppt_v0_with_vdd_leakage(hwmgr, &vddci, &data->vddci_leakage); tab->vddci = vddci;
A recent bugfix replaced an out-of-bounds access with direct use of unintialized data: drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr/smu7_hwmgr.c: In function 'smu7_patch_limits_vddc': drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr/smu7_hwmgr.c:2033:6: error: 'vddc' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized] drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr/smu7_hwmgr.c:2146:11: note: 'vddc' was declared here drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr/smu7_hwmgr.c:2033:6: error: 'vddci' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized] drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr/smu7_hwmgr.c:2146:17: note: 'vddci' was declared here uint32_t vddc, vddci; This initializes the data as before using the correct type. Fixes: 77f7f71f5be1 ("drm/amdgpu/powerplay/smu7: fix static checker warning") Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr/smu7_hwmgr.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) -- 2.9.0