| Message ID | 57950510.5n95rqyCDA@wuerfel |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c index 4cf1390784e5..5afe02cce9aa 100644 --- a/drivers/regulator/core.c +++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c @@ -142,7 +142,11 @@ static void regulator_lock_supply(struct regulator_dev *rdev) int i = 0; while (1) { - mutex_lock_nested(&rdev->mutex, i++); + mutex_lock_nested(&rdev->mutex, i); + + /* avoid unused variable warning without DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC */ + (void)i++; + supply = rdev->supply; if (!rdev->supply)
The second argument of the mutex_lock_nested() helper is only evaluated if CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC is set. Otherwise we get this build warning for the new regulator_lock_supply function: drivers/regulator/core.c: In function 'regulator_lock_supply': drivers/regulator/core.c:142:6: warning: unused variable 'i' [-Wunused-variable] To avoid the warning, this patch moves the postincrement outside of the call mutex_lock_nested(), which is enough to shut up gcc about it. We had some discussion about changing mutex_lock_nested to an inline function, which would make the code do the right thing here, but in the end decided against it, in order to guarantee that mutex_lock_nested() does not introduced overhead without CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Fixes: 9f01cd4a915 ("regulator: core: introduce function to lock regulators and its supplies") Link: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2068900 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/