| Message ID | 00a3cebb2febc73dd275cbff2a24c73fb11ff255.1502941122.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Commit | e948bc8fbee077735c2b71b991a5ca5e573f3506 |
| Headers | show |
On Thursday, August 17, 2017 5:42:27 AM CEST Viresh Kumar wrote: > If transition_delay_us isn't defined by the cpufreq driver, the default > value of transition delay (time after which the cpufreq governor will > try updating the frequency again) is currently calculated by multiplying > transition_latency (nsec) with LATENCY_MULTIPLIER (1000) and then > converting this time to usec. That gives the exact same value as > transition_latency, just that the time unit is usec instead of nsec. > > With acpi-cpufreq for example, transition_latency is set to around 10 > usec and we get transition delay as 10 ms. Which seems to be a > reasonable amount of time to reevaluate the frequency again. > > But for platforms where frequency switching isn't that fast (like ARM), > the transition_latency varies from 500 usec to 3 ms, and the transition > delay becomes 500 ms to 3 seconds. Of course, that is a pretty bad > default value to start with. > > We can try to come across a better formula (instead of multiplying with > LATENCY_MULTIPLIER) to solve this problem, but will that be worth it ? > > This patch tries a simple approach and caps the maximum value of default > transition delay to 10 ms. Of course, userspace can still come in and > change this value anytime or individual drivers can rather provide > transition_delay_us instead. > > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> > --- > One of the IMX shows odd behavior after this patch is applied and stays > at max freq for little longer. More detailed debugging is required to be > done by some IMX guys (who haven't replied for the last 3 weeks on that > email thread, apart from Leonard). > > As per Leonard as well, we shouldn't stop this patch from getting merged > and so sending it again. > > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 15 +++++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c > index b2cc98551fc3..c7ae67d6886d 100644 > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c > @@ -532,8 +532,19 @@ unsigned int cpufreq_policy_transition_delay_us(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) > return policy->transition_delay_us; > > latency = policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency / NSEC_PER_USEC; > - if (latency) > - return latency * LATENCY_MULTIPLIER; > + if (latency) { > + /* > + * For platforms that can change the frequency very fast (< 10 > + * us), the above formula gives a decent transition delay. But > + * for platforms where transition_latency is in milliseconds, it > + * ends up giving unrealistic values. > + * > + * Cap the default transition delay to 10 ms, which seems to be > + * a reasonable amount of time after which we should reevaluate > + * the frequency. > + */ > + return min(latency * LATENCY_MULTIPLIER, (unsigned int)10000); > + } > > return LATENCY_MULTIPLIER; > } > Applied, thanks!
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c index b2cc98551fc3..c7ae67d6886d 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c @@ -532,8 +532,19 @@ unsigned int cpufreq_policy_transition_delay_us(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) return policy->transition_delay_us; latency = policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency / NSEC_PER_USEC; - if (latency) - return latency * LATENCY_MULTIPLIER; + if (latency) { + /* + * For platforms that can change the frequency very fast (< 10 + * us), the above formula gives a decent transition delay. But + * for platforms where transition_latency is in milliseconds, it + * ends up giving unrealistic values. + * + * Cap the default transition delay to 10 ms, which seems to be + * a reasonable amount of time after which we should reevaluate + * the frequency. + */ + return min(latency * LATENCY_MULTIPLIER, (unsigned int)10000); + } return LATENCY_MULTIPLIER; }
If transition_delay_us isn't defined by the cpufreq driver, the default value of transition delay (time after which the cpufreq governor will try updating the frequency again) is currently calculated by multiplying transition_latency (nsec) with LATENCY_MULTIPLIER (1000) and then converting this time to usec. That gives the exact same value as transition_latency, just that the time unit is usec instead of nsec. With acpi-cpufreq for example, transition_latency is set to around 10 usec and we get transition delay as 10 ms. Which seems to be a reasonable amount of time to reevaluate the frequency again. But for platforms where frequency switching isn't that fast (like ARM), the transition_latency varies from 500 usec to 3 ms, and the transition delay becomes 500 ms to 3 seconds. Of course, that is a pretty bad default value to start with. We can try to come across a better formula (instead of multiplying with LATENCY_MULTIPLIER) to solve this problem, but will that be worth it ? This patch tries a simple approach and caps the maximum value of default transition delay to 10 ms. Of course, userspace can still come in and change this value anytime or individual drivers can rather provide transition_delay_us instead. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> --- One of the IMX shows odd behavior after this patch is applied and stays at max freq for little longer. More detailed debugging is required to be done by some IMX guys (who haven't replied for the last 3 weeks on that email thread, apart from Leonard). As per Leonard as well, we shouldn't stop this patch from getting merged and so sending it again. drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 15 +++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) -- 2.14.1.202.g24db08a6e8fe