| Message ID | 20171014154858.35123-5-raj.khem@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [1/7] go-dep: Upgrade to 0.3.1 | expand |
On 14 October 2017 at 16:48, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote: > Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> > --- > .../libcheck/{libcheck_0.10.0.bb => libcheck_git.bb} | 11 > ++++++----- > Why not 0.11.0? Ross <div dir="ltr">On 14 October 2017 at 16:48, Khem Raj <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:raj.khem@gmail.com" target="_blank">raj.khem@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <<a href="mailto:raj.khem@gmail.com">raj.khem@gmail.com</a>><br> ---<br> .../libcheck/{<a href="http://libcheck_0.10.0.bb" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">libcheck_0.10.0.<wbr>bb</a> => <a href="http://libcheck_git.bb" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">libcheck_git.bb</a>} | 11 ++++++-----<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Why not 0.11.0?</div><div><br></div><div>Ross </div></div></div></div> -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 5:33 AM, Burton, Ross <ross.burton@intel.com> wrote: > On 14 October 2017 at 16:48, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> >> --- >> .../libcheck/{libcheck_0.10.0.bb => libcheck_git.bb} | 11 >> ++++++----- > > > Why not 0.11.0? > I was getting printf format related security warnings. Latest built with clang/gcc and musl > Ross -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
On 17 October 2017 at 20:25, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 5:33 AM, Burton, Ross <ross.burton@intel.com> > wrote: > > On 14 October 2017 at 16:48, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> > >> --- > >> .../libcheck/{libcheck_0.10.0.bb => libcheck_git.bb} | 11 > >> ++++++----- > > > > > > Why not 0.11.0? > > > > I was getting printf format related security warnings. Latest built > with clang/gcc and musl > Not a massive fan of "random SHA", can we cherry-pick the patches? Ross <div dir="ltr">On 17 October 2017 at 20:25, Khem Raj <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:raj.khem@gmail.com" target="_blank">raj.khem@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 5:33 AM, Burton, Ross <<a href="mailto:ross.burton@intel.com">ross.burton@intel.com</a>> wrote:<br> > On 14 October 2017 at 16:48, Khem Raj <<a href="mailto:raj.khem@gmail.com">raj.khem@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br> >><br> >> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <<a href="mailto:raj.khem@gmail.com">raj.khem@gmail.com</a>><br> >> ---<br> >> .../libcheck/{<a href="http://libcheck_0.10.0.bb" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">libcheck_0.10.0.<wbr>bb</a> => <a href="http://libcheck_git.bb" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">libcheck_git.bb</a>} | 11<br> >> ++++++-----<br> ><br> ><br> > Why not 0.11.0?<br> ><br> <br> </span>I was getting printf format related security warnings. Latest built<br> with clang/gcc and musl<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Not a massive fan of "random SHA", can we cherry-pick the patches?</div><div><br></div><div>Ross </div></div></div></div> -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 1:10 PM, Burton, Ross <ross.burton@intel.com> wrote: > On 17 October 2017 at 20:25, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 5:33 AM, Burton, Ross <ross.burton@intel.com> >> wrote: >> > On 14 October 2017 at 16:48, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> >> >> --- >> >> .../libcheck/{libcheck_0.10.0.bb => libcheck_git.bb} | 11 >> >> ++++++----- >> > >> > >> > Why not 0.11.0? >> > >> >> I was getting printf format related security warnings. Latest built >> with clang/gcc and musl > > > Not a massive fan of "random SHA", can we cherry-pick the patches? > Sure, let me do that and since the libevdev issue, I might be lucky that it was somewhere in my layer mix there were errors. > Ross -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 5:43 PM, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 1:10 PM, Burton, Ross <ross.burton@intel.com> wrote: >> On 17 October 2017 at 20:25, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 5:33 AM, Burton, Ross <ross.burton@intel.com> >>> wrote: >>> > On 14 October 2017 at 16:48, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> >>> >> --- >>> >> .../libcheck/{libcheck_0.10.0.bb => libcheck_git.bb} | 11 >>> >> ++++++----- >>> > >>> > >>> > Why not 0.11.0? >>> > >>> >>> I was getting printf format related security warnings. Latest built >>> with clang/gcc and musl >> >> >> Not a massive fan of "random SHA", can we cherry-pick the patches? >> > > Sure, let me do that and since the libevdev issue, I might be lucky > that it was somewhere in my layer mix there were errors. OK now I see, so many context switches and I forgot. The issue is actually happening on morty branch, but the fix should fly through master and eventually land in morty -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/libcheck/libcheck_0.10.0.bb b/meta/recipes-support/libcheck/libcheck_git.bb similarity index 66% rename from meta/recipes-support/libcheck/libcheck_0.10.0.bb rename to meta/recipes-support/libcheck/libcheck_git.bb index 9d34198a96..2c28afefaa 100644 --- a/meta/recipes-support/libcheck/libcheck_0.10.0.bb +++ b/meta/recipes-support/libcheck/libcheck_git.bb @@ -5,13 +5,14 @@ SECTION = "devel" LICENSE = "LGPLv2.1+" LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING.LESSER;md5=2d5025d4aa3495befef8f17206a5b0a1" -SRC_URI = "${SOURCEFORGE_MIRROR}/check/check-${PV}.tar.gz \ - " +SRCREV = "23ee70fee382df7f604b1756a35a9d4c7b632805" + +PV = "0.11.0+git${SRCPV}" -SRC_URI[md5sum] = "53c5e5c77d090e103a17f3ed7fd7d8b8" -SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "f5f50766aa6f8fe5a2df752666ca01a950add45079aa06416b83765b1cf71052" +SRC_URI = "git://github.com/libcheck/check;protocol=https\ + " -S = "${WORKDIR}/check-${PV}" +S = "${WORKDIR}/git" inherit autotools pkgconfig texinfo
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> --- .../libcheck/{libcheck_0.10.0.bb => libcheck_git.bb} | 11 ++++++----- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) rename meta/recipes-support/libcheck/{libcheck_0.10.0.bb => libcheck_git.bb} (66%) -- 2.14.2 -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core