@@ -681,12 +681,6 @@ static inline int of_property_count_elems_of_size(const struct device_node *np,
return -ENOSYS;
}
-static inline int of_property_read_u32_index(const struct device_node *np,
- const char *propname, u32 index, u32 *out_value)
-{
- return -ENOSYS;
-}
-
static inline int of_property_read_u8_array(const struct device_node *np,
const char *propname, u8 *out_values, size_t sz)
{
@@ -713,16 +707,14 @@ static inline int of_property_read_u64_array(const struct device_node *np,
return -ENOSYS;
}
-static inline int of_property_read_string(const struct device_node *np,
- const char *propname,
- const char **out_string)
+static inline int of_property_read_u32_index(const struct device_node *np,
+ const char *propname, u32 index, u32 *out_value)
{
return -ENOSYS;
}
-static inline int of_property_read_string_helper(const struct device_node *np,
- const char *propname,
- const char **out_strs, size_t sz, int index)
+static inline int of_property_read_u64_index(const struct device_node *np,
+ const char *propname, u32 index, u64 *out_value)
{
return -ENOSYS;
}
@@ -750,12 +742,51 @@ static inline int of_n_size_cells(struct device_node *np)
return 0;
}
+static inline int of_property_read_variable_u8_array(const struct device_node *np,
+ const char *propname, u8 *out_values,
+ size_t sz_min, size_t sz_max)
+{
+ return -ENOSYS;
+}
+
+static inline int of_property_read_variable_u16_array(const struct device_node *np,
+ const char *propname, u16 *out_values,
+ size_t sz_min, size_t sz_max)
+{
+ return -ENOSYS;
+}
+
+static inline int of_property_read_variable_u32_array(const struct device_node *np,
+ const char *propname,
+ u32 *out_values,
+ size_t sz_min,
+ size_t sz_max)
+{
+ return -ENOSYS;
+}
+
static inline int of_property_read_u64(const struct device_node *np,
const char *propname, u64 *out_value)
{
return -ENOSYS;
}
+static inline int of_property_read_variable_u64_array(const struct device_node *np,
+ const char *propname,
+ u64 *out_values,
+ size_t sz_min,
+ size_t sz_max)
+{
+ return -ENOSYS;
+}
+
+static inline int of_property_read_string(const struct device_node *np,
+ const char *propname,
+ const char **out_string)
+{
+ return -ENOSYS;
+}
+
static inline int of_property_match_string(const struct device_node *np,
const char *propname,
const char *string)
@@ -763,6 +794,13 @@ static inline int of_property_match_string(const struct device_node *np,
return -ENOSYS;
}
+static inline int of_property_read_string_helper(const struct device_node *np,
+ const char *propname,
+ const char **out_strs, size_t sz, int index)
+{
+ return -ENOSYS;
+}
+
static inline struct device_node *of_parse_phandle(const struct device_node *np,
const char *phandle_name,
int index)
Commit a67e9472da42 ("of: Add array read functions with min/max size limits") added a new interface for reading variable-length arrays from DT properties. One user was added in dsa recently and this causes a build error because that code can be built with CONFIG_OF disabled: net/dsa/dsa2.c: In function 'dsa_switch_parse_member_of': net/dsa/dsa2.c:678:7: error: implicit declaration of function 'of_property_read_variable_u32_array'; did you mean 'of_property_read_u32_array'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] This adds a dummy functions for of_property_read_variable_u32_array() and a few others that had been missing here. I decided to move of_property_read_string() and of_property_read_string_helper() in the process to make it easier to compare the two sets of function prototypes to make sure they match. Fixes: 975e6e32215e ("net: dsa: rework switch parsing") Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> --- DT maintainers: there is currently a build break in the net-next tree (from branch "dsa-parsing-stage") because of this, I think the best way forward would be to get an Ack for this patch to get picked up through the netdev trees. --- include/linux/of.h | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) -- 2.9.0