diff mbox series

drivers: base: cacheinfo: fix cache type for non-architected system cache

Message ID 1510919801-6738-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com
State Accepted
Commit f57ab9a01a36ef3454333251cc57e3a9948b17bf
Headers show
Series drivers: base: cacheinfo: fix cache type for non-architected system cache | expand

Commit Message

Sudeep Holla Nov. 17, 2017, 11:56 a.m. UTC 
Commit dfea747d2aba ("drivers: base: cacheinfo: support DT overrides for
cache properties") doesn't initialise the cache type if it's present
only in DT and the architecture is not aware of it. They are unified
system level cache which are generally transparent.

This patch check if the cache type is set to NOCACHE but the DT node
indicates that it's unified cache and sets the cache type accordingly.

Fixes: dfea747d2aba ("drivers: base: cacheinfo: support DT overrides for cache properties")
Reported-and-tested-by: Tan Xiaojun <tanxiaojun@huawei.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>

---
 drivers/base/cacheinfo.c | 13 +++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)

-- 
2.7.4
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c b/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c
index eb3af2739537..07532d83be0b 100644
--- a/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c
+++ b/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c
@@ -186,6 +186,11 @@  static void cache_associativity(struct cacheinfo *this_leaf)
 		this_leaf->ways_of_associativity = (size / nr_sets) / line_size;
 }
 
+static bool cache_node_is_unified(struct cacheinfo *this_leaf)
+{
+	return of_property_read_bool(this_leaf->of_node, "cache-unified");
+}
+
 static void cache_of_override_properties(unsigned int cpu)
 {
 	int index;
@@ -194,6 +199,14 @@  static void cache_of_override_properties(unsigned int cpu)
 
 	for (index = 0; index < cache_leaves(cpu); index++) {
 		this_leaf = this_cpu_ci->info_list + index;
+		/*
+		 * init_cache_level must setup the cache level correctly
+		 * overriding the architecturally specified levels, so
+		 * if type is NONE at this stage, it should be unified
+		 */
+		if (this_leaf->type == CACHE_TYPE_NOCACHE &&
+		    cache_node_is_unified(this_leaf))
+			this_leaf->type = CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED;
 		cache_size(this_leaf);
 		cache_get_line_size(this_leaf);
 		cache_nr_sets(this_leaf);