Message ID | 20171201165613.10358-5-dmurphy@ti.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | [v6,1/6] leds: Add new API to derive a LED name | expand |
On 12/01/2017 10:56 AM, Dan Murphy wrote: > Fix the LED label generation for the LP8860 to > conform with the > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/common.txt > > document indicating the LED label should be part of a > child node to the device parent. If no label is > in the child node then the LED label is created based > on the parent node name and the alternate name passed in. > > Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@ti.com> > --- > > v6 - New patch to use the new LED class API > > drivers/leds/leds-lp8860.c | 27 +++++++++++++++------------ > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-lp8860.c b/drivers/leds/leds-lp8860.c > index 3e70775a2d54..26bbfa144402 100644 > --- a/drivers/leds/leds-lp8860.c > +++ b/drivers/leds/leds-lp8860.c > @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ > #include <linux/of_gpio.h> > #include <linux/gpio/consumer.h> > #include <linux/slab.h> > +#include <uapi/linux/uleds.h> > > #define LP8860_DISP_CL1_BRT_MSB 0x00 > #define LP8860_DISP_CL1_BRT_LSB 0x01 > @@ -86,8 +87,6 @@ > > #define LP8860_CLEAR_FAULTS 0x01 > > -#define LP8860_DISP_LED_NAME "display_cluster" > - > /** > * struct lp8860_led - > * @lock - Lock for reading/writing the device > @@ -107,7 +106,7 @@ struct lp8860_led { > struct regmap *eeprom_regmap; > struct gpio_desc *enable_gpio; > struct regulator *regulator; > - const char *label; > + char label[LED_MAX_NAME_SIZE]; > }; > > struct lp8860_eeprom_reg { > @@ -318,7 +317,7 @@ static const struct regmap_config lp8860_regmap_config = { > .max_register = LP8860_EEPROM_UNLOCK, > .reg_defaults = lp8860_reg_defs, > .num_reg_defaults = ARRAY_SIZE(lp8860_reg_defs), > - .cache_type = REGCACHE_NONE, > + .cache_type = REGCACHE_RBTREE, > }; > > static const struct reg_default lp8860_eeprom_defs[] = { > @@ -356,7 +355,7 @@ static const struct regmap_config lp8860_eeprom_regmap_config = { > .max_register = LP8860_EEPROM_REG_24, > .reg_defaults = lp8860_eeprom_defs, > .num_reg_defaults = ARRAY_SIZE(lp8860_eeprom_defs), > - .cache_type = REGCACHE_NONE, > + .cache_type = REGCACHE_RBTREE, > }; > > static int lp8860_probe(struct i2c_client *client, > @@ -365,19 +364,23 @@ static int lp8860_probe(struct i2c_client *client, > int ret; > struct lp8860_led *led; > struct device_node *np = client->dev.of_node; > + struct device_node *child_node; > + > + if (!client->dev.of_node) > + return -ENODEV; This is actually a bug in the driver. I can submit this independently or keep this here > > led = devm_kzalloc(&client->dev, sizeof(*led), GFP_KERNEL); > if (!led) > return -ENOMEM; > > - led->label = LP8860_DISP_LED_NAME; > + for_each_available_child_of_node(np, child_node) { > + led->led_dev.default_trigger = of_get_property(child_node, > + "linux,default-trigger", > + NULL); Not sure if you want me to pull this out into a different patch or just add it to the commit message > > - if (client->dev.of_node) { > - ret = of_property_read_string(np, "label", &led->label); > - if (ret) { > - dev_err(&client->dev, "Missing label in dt\n"); > - return -EINVAL; > - } > + of_led_compose_name(np, child_node, "white:backlight", > + sizeof("white:backlight"), > + led->label); > } > > led->enable_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(&client->dev, > -- ------------------ Dan Murphy
Dan, On 12/04/2017 02:11 PM, Dan Murphy wrote: > Jacek > > On 12/03/2017 07:57 AM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote: >> Dan, >> >> On 12/01/2017 05:56 PM, Dan Murphy wrote: >>> Fix the LED label generation for the LP8860 to >>> conform with the >>> >>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/common.txt >>> >>> document indicating the LED label should be part of a >>> child node to the device parent. If no label is >>> in the child node then the LED label is created based >>> on the parent node name and the alternate name passed in. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@ti.com> >>> --- >>> >>> v6 - New patch to use the new LED class API >>> >>> drivers/leds/leds-lp8860.c | 27 +++++++++++++++------------ >>> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-lp8860.c b/drivers/leds/leds-lp8860.c >>> index 3e70775a2d54..26bbfa144402 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/leds/leds-lp8860.c >>> +++ b/drivers/leds/leds-lp8860.c >>> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ >>> #include <linux/of_gpio.h> >>> #include <linux/gpio/consumer.h> >>> #include <linux/slab.h> >>> +#include <uapi/linux/uleds.h> >>> >>> #define LP8860_DISP_CL1_BRT_MSB 0x00 >>> #define LP8860_DISP_CL1_BRT_LSB 0x01 >>> @@ -86,8 +87,6 @@ >>> >>> #define LP8860_CLEAR_FAULTS 0x01 >>> >>> -#define LP8860_DISP_LED_NAME "display_cluster" >>> - >>> /** >>> * struct lp8860_led - >>> * @lock - Lock for reading/writing the device >>> @@ -107,7 +106,7 @@ struct lp8860_led { >>> struct regmap *eeprom_regmap; >>> struct gpio_desc *enable_gpio; >>> struct regulator *regulator; >>> - const char *label; >>> + char label[LED_MAX_NAME_SIZE]; >>> }; >>> >>> struct lp8860_eeprom_reg { >>> @@ -318,7 +317,7 @@ static const struct regmap_config lp8860_regmap_config = { >>> .max_register = LP8860_EEPROM_UNLOCK, >>> .reg_defaults = lp8860_reg_defs, >>> .num_reg_defaults = ARRAY_SIZE(lp8860_reg_defs), >>> - .cache_type = REGCACHE_NONE, >>> + .cache_type = REGCACHE_RBTREE, >> >> This seems to be an unrelated change. >> Please split it to the separate patch and explain its merit. > > ACK. It will be a separate patch > >> >>> }; >>> >>> static const struct reg_default lp8860_eeprom_defs[] = { >>> @@ -356,7 +355,7 @@ static const struct regmap_config lp8860_eeprom_regmap_config = { >>> .max_register = LP8860_EEPROM_REG_24, >>> .reg_defaults = lp8860_eeprom_defs, >>> .num_reg_defaults = ARRAY_SIZE(lp8860_eeprom_defs), >>> - .cache_type = REGCACHE_NONE, >>> + .cache_type = REGCACHE_RBTREE, >>> }; >>> >>> static int lp8860_probe(struct i2c_client *client, >>> @@ -365,19 +364,23 @@ static int lp8860_probe(struct i2c_client *client, >>> int ret; >>> struct lp8860_led *led; >>> struct device_node *np = client->dev.of_node; >>> + struct device_node *child_node; >>> + >>> + if (!client->dev.of_node) >>> + return -ENODEV; >>> >>> led = devm_kzalloc(&client->dev, sizeof(*led), GFP_KERNEL); >>> if (!led) >>> return -ENOMEM; >>> >>> - led->label = LP8860_DISP_LED_NAME; >>> + for_each_available_child_of_node(np, child_node) { >>> + led->led_dev.default_trigger = of_get_property(child_node, >>> + "linux,default-trigger", >>> + NULL); >>> >>> - if (client->dev.of_node) { >>> - ret = of_property_read_string(np, "label", &led->label); >>> - if (ret) { >>> - dev_err(&client->dev, "Missing label in dt\n"); >>> - return -EINVAL; >>> - } >>> + of_led_compose_name(np, child_node, "white:backlight", >>> + sizeof("white:backlight"), >>> + led->label); >> >> Let's skip it for now. > > I will make the same change here as I do for the lm3692x driver. > >> >> Please also CC driver author always when you're modifying it. > > The author was on the email. > > It is me. ;) > > MODULE_AUTHOR("Dan Murphy <dmurphy@ti.com>"); OK, but the author of the driver touched by the patch 6/6 is different :-) -- Best regards, Jacek Anaszewski
diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-lp8860.c b/drivers/leds/leds-lp8860.c index 3e70775a2d54..26bbfa144402 100644 --- a/drivers/leds/leds-lp8860.c +++ b/drivers/leds/leds-lp8860.c @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ #include <linux/of_gpio.h> #include <linux/gpio/consumer.h> #include <linux/slab.h> +#include <uapi/linux/uleds.h> #define LP8860_DISP_CL1_BRT_MSB 0x00 #define LP8860_DISP_CL1_BRT_LSB 0x01 @@ -86,8 +87,6 @@ #define LP8860_CLEAR_FAULTS 0x01 -#define LP8860_DISP_LED_NAME "display_cluster" - /** * struct lp8860_led - * @lock - Lock for reading/writing the device @@ -107,7 +106,7 @@ struct lp8860_led { struct regmap *eeprom_regmap; struct gpio_desc *enable_gpio; struct regulator *regulator; - const char *label; + char label[LED_MAX_NAME_SIZE]; }; struct lp8860_eeprom_reg { @@ -318,7 +317,7 @@ static const struct regmap_config lp8860_regmap_config = { .max_register = LP8860_EEPROM_UNLOCK, .reg_defaults = lp8860_reg_defs, .num_reg_defaults = ARRAY_SIZE(lp8860_reg_defs), - .cache_type = REGCACHE_NONE, + .cache_type = REGCACHE_RBTREE, }; static const struct reg_default lp8860_eeprom_defs[] = { @@ -356,7 +355,7 @@ static const struct regmap_config lp8860_eeprom_regmap_config = { .max_register = LP8860_EEPROM_REG_24, .reg_defaults = lp8860_eeprom_defs, .num_reg_defaults = ARRAY_SIZE(lp8860_eeprom_defs), - .cache_type = REGCACHE_NONE, + .cache_type = REGCACHE_RBTREE, }; static int lp8860_probe(struct i2c_client *client, @@ -365,19 +364,23 @@ static int lp8860_probe(struct i2c_client *client, int ret; struct lp8860_led *led; struct device_node *np = client->dev.of_node; + struct device_node *child_node; + + if (!client->dev.of_node) + return -ENODEV; led = devm_kzalloc(&client->dev, sizeof(*led), GFP_KERNEL); if (!led) return -ENOMEM; - led->label = LP8860_DISP_LED_NAME; + for_each_available_child_of_node(np, child_node) { + led->led_dev.default_trigger = of_get_property(child_node, + "linux,default-trigger", + NULL); - if (client->dev.of_node) { - ret = of_property_read_string(np, "label", &led->label); - if (ret) { - dev_err(&client->dev, "Missing label in dt\n"); - return -EINVAL; - } + of_led_compose_name(np, child_node, "white:backlight", + sizeof("white:backlight"), + led->label); } led->enable_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(&client->dev,
Fix the LED label generation for the LP8860 to conform with the Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/common.txt document indicating the LED label should be part of a child node to the device parent. If no label is in the child node then the LED label is created based on the parent node name and the alternate name passed in. Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@ti.com> --- v6 - New patch to use the new LED class API drivers/leds/leds-lp8860.c | 27 +++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) -- 2.15.0.124.g7668cbc60