Message ID | 1514547423-18965-5-git-send-email-ulf.hansson@linaro.org |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | PM / core: Extend behaviour for wakeup paths | expand |
On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 12:37 PM, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> wrote: > In general, wakeup settings are not supposed to be changed during any of > the system wide PM phases. The reason is simply that it would break > guarantees provided by the PM core, to properly act on active wakeup > sources. > > However, there are exceptions to when, in particular, disabling a device as > wakeup source makes sense. For example, in cases when a driver realizes > that its device is dead during system suspend. For these scenarios, we > don't need to care about acting on the wakeup source correctly, because a > dead device shouldn't deliver wakeup signals. > > To this reasoning and to help users to properly manage wakeup settings, > let's print a warning in cases someone calls device_wakeup_enable() during > system sleep. > > Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> > --- > drivers/base/power/main.c | 4 ++++ > drivers/base/power/wakeup.c | 4 ++++ > include/linux/pm.h | 1 + > 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/base/power/main.c b/drivers/base/power/main.c > index 1327726..6b0d312 100644 > --- a/drivers/base/power/main.c > +++ b/drivers/base/power/main.c > @@ -1030,6 +1030,8 @@ static void device_complete(struct device *dev, pm_message_t state) > callback(dev); > } > > + dev->power.may_set_wakeup = dev->power.can_wakeup; > + > device_unlock(dev); > > pm_runtime_put(dev); > @@ -1747,6 +1749,7 @@ static int device_prepare(struct device *dev, pm_message_t state) > > device_lock(dev); > > + dev->power.may_set_wakeup = false; > dev->power.wakeup_path = false; > > if (dev->power.no_pm_callbacks) { > @@ -1775,6 +1778,7 @@ static int device_prepare(struct device *dev, pm_message_t state) > if (ret < 0) { > suspend_report_result(callback, ret); > pm_runtime_put(dev); > + dev->power.may_set_wakeup = dev->power.can_wakeup; > return ret; > } > /* > diff --git a/drivers/base/power/wakeup.c b/drivers/base/power/wakeup.c > index cb72965..5445bea 100644 > --- a/drivers/base/power/wakeup.c > +++ b/drivers/base/power/wakeup.c > @@ -268,6 +268,9 @@ int device_wakeup_enable(struct device *dev) > if (!dev || !dev->power.can_wakeup) > return -EINVAL; > > + if (!dev->power.may_set_wakeup) > + dev_warn(dev, "don't enable as wakup source during sleep!\n"); > + > ws = wakeup_source_register(dev_name(dev)); > if (!ws) > return -ENOMEM; > @@ -413,6 +416,7 @@ void device_set_wakeup_capable(struct device *dev, bool capable) > return; > > dev->power.can_wakeup = capable; > + dev->power.may_set_wakeup = capable; > if (device_is_registered(dev) && !list_empty(&dev->power.entry)) { > if (capable) { > int ret = wakeup_sysfs_add(dev); > diff --git a/include/linux/pm.h b/include/linux/pm.h > index ebc6ef8..106fb15 100644 > --- a/include/linux/pm.h > +++ b/include/linux/pm.h > @@ -606,6 +606,7 @@ struct dev_pm_info { > struct list_head entry; > struct completion completion; > struct wakeup_source *wakeup; > + bool may_set_wakeup:1; > bool wakeup_path:1; > bool syscore:1; > bool no_pm_callbacks:1; /* Owned by the PM core */ > -- I didn't mean anything so complicated. :-) Just a warning message if (pm_suspend_target_state != PM_SUSPEND_ON) in device_wakeup_enable() (or equivalent) should be sufficient.
On 30 December 2017 at 01:58, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 12:37 PM, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> wrote: >> In general, wakeup settings are not supposed to be changed during any of >> the system wide PM phases. The reason is simply that it would break >> guarantees provided by the PM core, to properly act on active wakeup >> sources. >> >> However, there are exceptions to when, in particular, disabling a device as >> wakeup source makes sense. For example, in cases when a driver realizes >> that its device is dead during system suspend. For these scenarios, we >> don't need to care about acting on the wakeup source correctly, because a >> dead device shouldn't deliver wakeup signals. >> >> To this reasoning and to help users to properly manage wakeup settings, >> let's print a warning in cases someone calls device_wakeup_enable() during >> system sleep. >> >> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> >> --- >> drivers/base/power/main.c | 4 ++++ >> drivers/base/power/wakeup.c | 4 ++++ >> include/linux/pm.h | 1 + >> 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/main.c b/drivers/base/power/main.c >> index 1327726..6b0d312 100644 >> --- a/drivers/base/power/main.c >> +++ b/drivers/base/power/main.c >> @@ -1030,6 +1030,8 @@ static void device_complete(struct device *dev, pm_message_t state) >> callback(dev); >> } >> >> + dev->power.may_set_wakeup = dev->power.can_wakeup; >> + >> device_unlock(dev); >> >> pm_runtime_put(dev); >> @@ -1747,6 +1749,7 @@ static int device_prepare(struct device *dev, pm_message_t state) >> >> device_lock(dev); >> >> + dev->power.may_set_wakeup = false; >> dev->power.wakeup_path = false; >> >> if (dev->power.no_pm_callbacks) { >> @@ -1775,6 +1778,7 @@ static int device_prepare(struct device *dev, pm_message_t state) >> if (ret < 0) { >> suspend_report_result(callback, ret); >> pm_runtime_put(dev); >> + dev->power.may_set_wakeup = dev->power.can_wakeup; >> return ret; >> } >> /* >> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/wakeup.c b/drivers/base/power/wakeup.c >> index cb72965..5445bea 100644 >> --- a/drivers/base/power/wakeup.c >> +++ b/drivers/base/power/wakeup.c >> @@ -268,6 +268,9 @@ int device_wakeup_enable(struct device *dev) >> if (!dev || !dev->power.can_wakeup) >> return -EINVAL; >> >> + if (!dev->power.may_set_wakeup) >> + dev_warn(dev, "don't enable as wakup source during sleep!\n"); >> + >> ws = wakeup_source_register(dev_name(dev)); >> if (!ws) >> return -ENOMEM; >> @@ -413,6 +416,7 @@ void device_set_wakeup_capable(struct device *dev, bool capable) >> return; >> >> dev->power.can_wakeup = capable; >> + dev->power.may_set_wakeup = capable; >> if (device_is_registered(dev) && !list_empty(&dev->power.entry)) { >> if (capable) { >> int ret = wakeup_sysfs_add(dev); >> diff --git a/include/linux/pm.h b/include/linux/pm.h >> index ebc6ef8..106fb15 100644 >> --- a/include/linux/pm.h >> +++ b/include/linux/pm.h >> @@ -606,6 +606,7 @@ struct dev_pm_info { >> struct list_head entry; >> struct completion completion; >> struct wakeup_source *wakeup; >> + bool may_set_wakeup:1; >> bool wakeup_path:1; >> bool syscore:1; >> bool no_pm_callbacks:1; /* Owned by the PM core */ >> -- > > I didn't mean anything so complicated. :-) Okay. :-) > > Just a warning message if (pm_suspend_target_state != PM_SUSPEND_ON) > in device_wakeup_enable() (or equivalent) should be sufficient. Alright, let me re-spin this and thanks for the suggestion. Kind regards Uffe
diff --git a/drivers/base/power/main.c b/drivers/base/power/main.c index 1327726..6b0d312 100644 --- a/drivers/base/power/main.c +++ b/drivers/base/power/main.c @@ -1030,6 +1030,8 @@ static void device_complete(struct device *dev, pm_message_t state) callback(dev); } + dev->power.may_set_wakeup = dev->power.can_wakeup; + device_unlock(dev); pm_runtime_put(dev); @@ -1747,6 +1749,7 @@ static int device_prepare(struct device *dev, pm_message_t state) device_lock(dev); + dev->power.may_set_wakeup = false; dev->power.wakeup_path = false; if (dev->power.no_pm_callbacks) { @@ -1775,6 +1778,7 @@ static int device_prepare(struct device *dev, pm_message_t state) if (ret < 0) { suspend_report_result(callback, ret); pm_runtime_put(dev); + dev->power.may_set_wakeup = dev->power.can_wakeup; return ret; } /* diff --git a/drivers/base/power/wakeup.c b/drivers/base/power/wakeup.c index cb72965..5445bea 100644 --- a/drivers/base/power/wakeup.c +++ b/drivers/base/power/wakeup.c @@ -268,6 +268,9 @@ int device_wakeup_enable(struct device *dev) if (!dev || !dev->power.can_wakeup) return -EINVAL; + if (!dev->power.may_set_wakeup) + dev_warn(dev, "don't enable as wakup source during sleep!\n"); + ws = wakeup_source_register(dev_name(dev)); if (!ws) return -ENOMEM; @@ -413,6 +416,7 @@ void device_set_wakeup_capable(struct device *dev, bool capable) return; dev->power.can_wakeup = capable; + dev->power.may_set_wakeup = capable; if (device_is_registered(dev) && !list_empty(&dev->power.entry)) { if (capable) { int ret = wakeup_sysfs_add(dev); diff --git a/include/linux/pm.h b/include/linux/pm.h index ebc6ef8..106fb15 100644 --- a/include/linux/pm.h +++ b/include/linux/pm.h @@ -606,6 +606,7 @@ struct dev_pm_info { struct list_head entry; struct completion completion; struct wakeup_source *wakeup; + bool may_set_wakeup:1; bool wakeup_path:1; bool syscore:1; bool no_pm_callbacks:1; /* Owned by the PM core */
In general, wakeup settings are not supposed to be changed during any of the system wide PM phases. The reason is simply that it would break guarantees provided by the PM core, to properly act on active wakeup sources. However, there are exceptions to when, in particular, disabling a device as wakeup source makes sense. For example, in cases when a driver realizes that its device is dead during system suspend. For these scenarios, we don't need to care about acting on the wakeup source correctly, because a dead device shouldn't deliver wakeup signals. To this reasoning and to help users to properly manage wakeup settings, let's print a warning in cases someone calls device_wakeup_enable() during system sleep. Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> --- drivers/base/power/main.c | 4 ++++ drivers/base/power/wakeup.c | 4 ++++ include/linux/pm.h | 1 + 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+) -- 2.7.4