Message ID | 20190604165802.7338-2-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Commit | cd21c54ad9c4c838e96d4d6e1bc9694eac1aa798 |
Headers | show |
Series | None | expand |
On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 6:58 PM Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> wrote: > The intelligent power allocator PID coefficient to be set in sysfs > are: > > k_d: 0 > k_po: 79 > k_i: 10 > k_pu: 50 With all the other interesting parametrization in the device tree I kind of wonder why the PID regulator constants defaults are not set up from device tree? Any specific reason? To me it seems like the kind of stuff userpace will invariably just get wrong or forget about (somebody just runs a different distribution without the extra magic to set sysfs right) unless we supply good defaults. Yours, Linus Walleij
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock960.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock960.dts index 12285c51cceb..701d5b5fad46 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock960.dts +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock960.dts @@ -114,6 +114,45 @@ }; }; +&thermal_zones { + cpu_thermal: cpu { + polling-delay-passive = <100>; + polling-delay = <1000>; + thermal-sensors = <&tsadc 0>; + sustainable-power = <1550>; + + trips { + cpu_alert0: cpu_alert0 { + temperature = <65000>; + hysteresis = <2000>; + type = "passive"; + }; + + cpu_alert1: cpu_alert1 { + temperature = <75000>; + hysteresis = <2000>; + type = "passive"; + }; + + cpu_crit: cpu_crit { + temperature = <95000>; + hysteresis = <2000>; + type = "critical"; + }; + }; + + cooling-maps { + map0 { + + trip = <&cpu_alert1>; + cooling-device = + <&cpu_b0 THERMAL_NO_LIMIT THERMAL_NO_LIMIT>, + <&cpu_b1 THERMAL_NO_LIMIT THERMAL_NO_LIMIT>; + }; + }; + }; +}; + &usbdrd_dwc3_0 { dr_mode = "otg"; };
Currently the default thermal values for the rk3399-rock960 board is inherited from the generic definition in rk3399.dtsi. In order to ensure the rock960 has more room for througput before being capped by the thermal framework and is correctly supported by the IPA governor, let's define the power values and the right trip points for better performances: - sustainable power is tested to be 1550mW - increase the first mitigation point to 75°C in order to get better performances - the first trip point is 65°C in order to let the IPA to collect enough data for the PID regulation when it reaches 75°C - restrict the cooling device to the big CPUs as the little CPUs contribution to the heating effect can be considered negligible The intelligent power allocator PID coefficient to be set in sysfs are: k_d: 0 k_po: 79 k_i: 10 k_pu: 50 Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> --- .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock960.dts | 39 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+) -- 2.17.1