diff mbox series

[RFC] Revert "iio: hid-sensor-attributes: Convert to use int_pow()"

Message ID 20190906154609.2421410-1-arnd@arndb.de
State New
Headers show
Series [RFC] Revert "iio: hid-sensor-attributes: Convert to use int_pow()" | expand

Commit Message

Arnd Bergmann Sept. 6, 2019, 3:45 p.m. UTC 
The change to use the generic int_pow instead of the private version
caused a number of build issues on 32-bit architectures and makes
it generally less efficient because of the 64-bit math:

drivers/iio/common/hid-sensors/hid-sensor-attributes.o: In function `hid_sensor_write_samp_freq_value':
hid-sensor-attributes.c:(.text+0x29c): undefined reference to `__aeabi_uldivmod'
drivers/iio/common/hid-sensors/hid-sensor-attributes.o: In function `hid_sensor_read_raw_hyst_value':
hid-sensor-attributes.c:(.text+0x420): undefined reference to `__aeabi_uldivmod'
hid-sensor-attributes.c:(.text+0x448): undefined reference to `__aeabi_uldivmod'
drivers/iio/common/hid-sensors/hid-sensor-attributes.o: In function `hid_sensor_write_raw_hyst_value':
hid-sensor-attributes.c:(.text+0x570): undefined reference to `__aeabi_uldivmod'

There is probably a nicer solution to this, but for the moment,
the revert makes it compile again.

Fixes: 473d12f7638c ("iio: hid-sensor-attributes: Convert to use int_pow()")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

---
 .../hid-sensors/hid-sensor-attributes.c       | 53 +++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

-- 
2.20.0

Comments

Andy Shevchenko Sept. 6, 2019, 4:55 p.m. UTC | #1 
On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 05:45:55PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The change to use the generic int_pow instead of the private version

> caused a number of build issues on 32-bit architectures and makes

> it generally less efficient because of the 64-bit math:

> 

> drivers/iio/common/hid-sensors/hid-sensor-attributes.o: In function `hid_sensor_write_samp_freq_value':

> hid-sensor-attributes.c:(.text+0x29c): undefined reference to `__aeabi_uldivmod'

> drivers/iio/common/hid-sensors/hid-sensor-attributes.o: In function `hid_sensor_read_raw_hyst_value':

> hid-sensor-attributes.c:(.text+0x420): undefined reference to `__aeabi_uldivmod'

> hid-sensor-attributes.c:(.text+0x448): undefined reference to `__aeabi_uldivmod'

> drivers/iio/common/hid-sensors/hid-sensor-attributes.o: In function `hid_sensor_write_raw_hyst_value':

> hid-sensor-attributes.c:(.text+0x570): undefined reference to `__aeabi_uldivmod'

> 

> There is probably a nicer solution to this, but for the moment,

> the revert makes it compile again.

> 

> Fixes: 473d12f7638c ("iio: hid-sensor-attributes: Convert to use int_pow()")


Does the fix [1] works for you?

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/6851830d050ddb2f27d1e6969755ee4f3293d37c.camel@intel.com/

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Arnd Bergmann Sept. 6, 2019, 6:46 p.m. UTC | #2 
On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 6:55 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>

> On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 05:45:55PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

> > The change to use the generic int_pow instead of the private version

> > caused a number of build issues on 32-bit architectures and makes

> > it generally less efficient because of the 64-bit math:

> >

> > drivers/iio/common/hid-sensors/hid-sensor-attributes.o: In function `hid_sensor_write_samp_freq_value':

> > hid-sensor-attributes.c:(.text+0x29c): undefined reference to `__aeabi_uldivmod'

> > drivers/iio/common/hid-sensors/hid-sensor-attributes.o: In function `hid_sensor_read_raw_hyst_value':

> > hid-sensor-attributes.c:(.text+0x420): undefined reference to `__aeabi_uldivmod'

> > hid-sensor-attributes.c:(.text+0x448): undefined reference to `__aeabi_uldivmod'

> > drivers/iio/common/hid-sensors/hid-sensor-attributes.o: In function `hid_sensor_write_raw_hyst_value':

> > hid-sensor-attributes.c:(.text+0x570): undefined reference to `__aeabi_uldivmod'

> >

> > There is probably a nicer solution to this, but for the moment,

> > the revert makes it compile again.

> >

> > Fixes: 473d12f7638c ("iio: hid-sensor-attributes: Convert to use int_pow()")

>

> Does the fix [1] works for you?

>

> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/6851830d050ddb2f27d1e6969755ee4f3293d37c.camel@intel.com/


It looks like a better fix, I applied that on my test build tree now, will
let you know if I find any remaining unexpected problems with it.

       Arnd
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/iio/common/hid-sensors/hid-sensor-attributes.c b/drivers/iio/common/hid-sensors/hid-sensor-attributes.c
index b9dd19b34267..a8a3fe428d8d 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/common/hid-sensors/hid-sensor-attributes.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/common/hid-sensors/hid-sensor-attributes.c
@@ -8,7 +8,6 @@ 
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/interrupt.h>
 #include <linux/irq.h>
-#include <linux/kernel.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <linux/hid-sensor-hub.h>
 #include <linux/iio/iio.h>
@@ -69,6 +68,16 @@  static struct {
 	{HID_USAGE_SENSOR_HUMIDITY, 0, 1000, 0},
 };
 
+static int pow_10(unsigned power)
+{
+	int i;
+	int ret = 1;
+	for (i = 0; i < power; ++i)
+		ret = ret * 10;
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
 static void simple_div(int dividend, int divisor, int *whole,
 				int *micro_frac)
 {
@@ -87,14 +96,14 @@  static void simple_div(int dividend, int divisor, int *whole,
 			rem *= 10;
 			exp++;
 		}
-		*micro_frac = (rem / divisor) * int_pow(10, 6 - exp);
+		*micro_frac = (rem / divisor) * pow_10(6-exp);
 	}
 }
 
 static void split_micro_fraction(unsigned int no, int exp, int *val1, int *val2)
 {
-	*val1 = no / int_pow(10, exp);
-	*val2 = no % int_pow(10, exp) * int_pow(10, 6 - exp);
+	*val1 = no/pow_10(exp);
+	*val2 = no%pow_10(exp) * pow_10(6-exp);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -116,7 +125,7 @@  static void convert_from_vtf_format(u32 value, int size, int exp,
 	}
 	exp = hid_sensor_convert_exponent(exp);
 	if (exp >= 0) {
-		*val1 = sign * value * int_pow(10, exp);
+		*val1 = sign * value * pow_10(exp);
 		*val2 = 0;
 	} else {
 		split_micro_fraction(value, -exp, val1, val2);
@@ -136,10 +145,10 @@  static u32 convert_to_vtf_format(int size, int exp, int val1, int val2)
 		sign = -1;
 	exp = hid_sensor_convert_exponent(exp);
 	if (exp < 0) {
-		value = abs(val1) * int_pow(10, -exp);
-		value += abs(val2) / int_pow(10, 6 + exp);
+		value = abs(val1) * pow_10(-exp);
+		value += abs(val2) / pow_10(6+exp);
 	} else
-		value = abs(val1) / int_pow(10, exp);
+		value = abs(val1) / pow_10(exp);
 	if (sign < 0)
 		value =  ((1LL << (size * 8)) - value);
 
@@ -202,12 +211,12 @@  int hid_sensor_write_samp_freq_value(struct hid_sensor_common *st,
 	if (val1 < 0 || val2 < 0)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	value = val1 * int_pow(10, 6) + val2;
+	value = val1 * pow_10(6) + val2;
 	if (value) {
 		if (st->poll.units == HID_USAGE_SENSOR_UNITS_MILLISECOND)
-			value = int_pow(10, 9) / value;
+			value = pow_10(9)/value;
 		else if (st->poll.units == HID_USAGE_SENSOR_UNITS_SECOND)
-			value = int_pow(10, 6) / value;
+			value = pow_10(6)/value;
 		else
 			value = 0;
 	}
@@ -302,34 +311,34 @@  static void adjust_exponent_nano(int *val0, int *val1, int scale0,
 	int rem;
 
 	if (exp > 0) {
-		*val0 = scale0 * int_pow(10, exp);
+		*val0 = scale0 * pow_10(exp);
 		res = 0;
 		if (exp > 9) {
 			*val1 = 0;
 			return;
 		}
 		for (i = 0; i < exp; ++i) {
-			x = scale1 / int_pow(10, 8 - i);
-			res += int_pow(10, exp - 1 - i) * x;
-			scale1 = scale1 % int_pow(10, 8 - i);
+			x = scale1 / pow_10(8 - i);
+			res += (pow_10(exp - 1 - i) * x);
+			scale1 = scale1 % pow_10(8 - i);
 		}
 		*val0 += res;
-		*val1 = scale1 * int_pow(10, exp);
+		*val1 = scale1 * pow_10(exp);
 	} else if (exp < 0) {
 		exp = abs(exp);
 		if (exp > 9) {
 			*val0 = *val1 = 0;
 			return;
 		}
-		*val0 = scale0 / int_pow(10, exp);
-		rem = scale0 % int_pow(10, exp);
+		*val0 = scale0 / pow_10(exp);
+		rem = scale0 % pow_10(exp);
 		res = 0;
 		for (i = 0; i < (9 - exp); ++i) {
-			x = scale1 / int_pow(10, 8 - i);
-			res += int_pow(10, 8 - exp - i) * x;
-			scale1 = scale1 % int_pow(10, 8 - i);
+			x = scale1 / pow_10(8 - i);
+			res += (pow_10(8 - exp - i) * x);
+			scale1 = scale1 % pow_10(8 - i);
 		}
-		*val1 = rem * int_pow(10, 9 - exp) + res;
+		*val1 = rem * pow_10(9 - exp) + res;
 	} else {
 		*val0 = scale0;
 		*val1 = scale1;