| Message ID | 20191023083324.12093-1-leo.yan@linaro.org |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Commit | b7dc21f546d854aea75245efd88d455f39f5d005 |
| Headers | show |
| Series | perf tests: Fix a typo | expand |
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 04:33:24PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote: > Correct typo in comment: s/suck/stuck. > > Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org> > --- > tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c b/tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c > index 166f411568a5..415903b48578 100644 > --- a/tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c > +++ b/tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c > @@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ bool test__bp_signal_is_supported(void) > * breakpointed instruction. > * > * Since arm64 has the same issue with arm for the single-step > - * handling, this case also gets suck on the breakpointed > + * handling, this case also gets stuck on the breakpointed > * instruction. > * > * Just disable the test for these architectures until these Thanks, and sorry for only spotting this after the offending patch was merged. Will
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 10:14:17AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 04:33:24PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote: > > Correct typo in comment: s/suck/stuck. > > > > Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org> > > --- > > tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c b/tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c > > index 166f411568a5..415903b48578 100644 > > --- a/tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c > > +++ b/tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c > > @@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ bool test__bp_signal_is_supported(void) > > * breakpointed instruction. > > * > > * Since arm64 has the same issue with arm for the single-step > > - * handling, this case also gets suck on the breakpointed > > + * handling, this case also gets stuck on the breakpointed > > * instruction. > > * > > * Just disable the test for these architectures until these > > Thanks, and sorry for only spotting this after the offending patch was > merged. No worries and thanks for review.
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c b/tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c index 166f411568a5..415903b48578 100644 --- a/tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c +++ b/tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c @@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ bool test__bp_signal_is_supported(void) * breakpointed instruction. * * Since arm64 has the same issue with arm for the single-step - * handling, this case also gets suck on the breakpointed + * handling, this case also gets stuck on the breakpointed * instruction. * * Just disable the test for these architectures until these
Correct typo in comment: s/suck/stuck. Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org> --- tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) -- 2.17.1