Message ID | 20191108203435.112759-5-arnd@arndb.de |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | None | expand |
On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 at 09:34:27PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > 'struct timespec' is getting removed from the kernel. The usage in ipmi > was fixed before in commit 48862ea2ce86 ("ipmi: Update timespec usage > to timespec64"), but unfortunately it crept back in. > > The busy looping code can better use ktime_t anyway, so use that > there to simplify the implementation. Thanks, this is a big improvement. I have this queued, but if you are going to submit this, I can remove it, and: Reviewed-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com> Do you think this should go in to 5.4? -corey > > Fixes: cbb19cb1eef0 ("ipmi_si: Convert timespec64 to timespec") > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > --- > drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c | 40 +++++++++++--------------------- > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c > index 6b9a0593d2eb..c7cc8538b84a 100644 > --- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c > +++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c > @@ -265,10 +265,10 @@ static void cleanup_ipmi_si(void); > #ifdef DEBUG_TIMING > void debug_timestamp(char *msg) > { > - struct timespec t; > + struct timespec64 t; > > - ktime_get_ts(&t); > - pr_debug("**%s: %ld.%9.9ld\n", msg, (long) t.tv_sec, t.tv_nsec); > + ktime_get_ts64(&t); > + pr_debug("**%s: %lld.%9.9ld\n", msg, t.tv_sec, t.tv_nsec); > } > #else > #define debug_timestamp(x) > @@ -935,38 +935,25 @@ static void set_run_to_completion(void *send_info, bool i_run_to_completion) > } > > /* > - * Use -1 in the nsec value of the busy waiting timespec to tell that > - * we are spinning in kipmid looking for something and not delaying > - * between checks > + * Use -1 as a special constant to tell that we are spinning in kipmid > + * looking for something and not delaying between checks > */ > -static inline void ipmi_si_set_not_busy(struct timespec *ts) > -{ > - ts->tv_nsec = -1; > -} > -static inline int ipmi_si_is_busy(struct timespec *ts) > -{ > - return ts->tv_nsec != -1; > -} > - > +#define IPMI_TIME_NOT_BUSY ns_to_ktime(-1ull) > static inline bool ipmi_thread_busy_wait(enum si_sm_result smi_result, > const struct smi_info *smi_info, > - struct timespec *busy_until) > + ktime_t *busy_until) > { > unsigned int max_busy_us = 0; > > if (smi_info->si_num < num_max_busy_us) > max_busy_us = kipmid_max_busy_us[smi_info->si_num]; > if (max_busy_us == 0 || smi_result != SI_SM_CALL_WITH_DELAY) > - ipmi_si_set_not_busy(busy_until); > - else if (!ipmi_si_is_busy(busy_until)) { > - ktime_get_ts(busy_until); > - timespec_add_ns(busy_until, max_busy_us * NSEC_PER_USEC); > + *busy_until = IPMI_TIME_NOT_BUSY; > + else if (*busy_until == IPMI_TIME_NOT_BUSY) { > + *busy_until = ktime_get() + max_busy_us * NSEC_PER_USEC; > } else { > - struct timespec now; > - > - ktime_get_ts(&now); > - if (unlikely(timespec_compare(&now, busy_until) > 0)) { > - ipmi_si_set_not_busy(busy_until); > + if (unlikely(ktime_get() > *busy_until)) { > + *busy_until = IPMI_TIME_NOT_BUSY; > return false; > } > } > @@ -988,9 +975,8 @@ static int ipmi_thread(void *data) > struct smi_info *smi_info = data; > unsigned long flags; > enum si_sm_result smi_result; > - struct timespec busy_until = { 0, 0 }; > + ktime_t busy_until = IPMI_TIME_NOT_BUSY; > > - ipmi_si_set_not_busy(&busy_until); > set_user_nice(current, MAX_NICE); > while (!kthread_should_stop()) { > int busy_wait; > -- > 2.20.0 >
On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 11:11 PM Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 at 09:34:27PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > 'struct timespec' is getting removed from the kernel. The usage in ipmi > > was fixed before in commit 48862ea2ce86 ("ipmi: Update timespec usage > > to timespec64"), but unfortunately it crept back in. > > > > The busy looping code can better use ktime_t anyway, so use that > > there to simplify the implementation. > > Thanks, this is a big improvement. I have this queued, but if you > are going to submit this, I can remove it, and: > > Reviewed-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com> I'd prefer to have this go through your tree, one less thing for me to worry about (out of the 90 patches). > Do you think this should go in to 5.4? Up to you, it probably depends on how well you can test that the change is correct beyond the review. Arnd
diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c index 6b9a0593d2eb..c7cc8538b84a 100644 --- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c +++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c @@ -265,10 +265,10 @@ static void cleanup_ipmi_si(void); #ifdef DEBUG_TIMING void debug_timestamp(char *msg) { - struct timespec t; + struct timespec64 t; - ktime_get_ts(&t); - pr_debug("**%s: %ld.%9.9ld\n", msg, (long) t.tv_sec, t.tv_nsec); + ktime_get_ts64(&t); + pr_debug("**%s: %lld.%9.9ld\n", msg, t.tv_sec, t.tv_nsec); } #else #define debug_timestamp(x) @@ -935,38 +935,25 @@ static void set_run_to_completion(void *send_info, bool i_run_to_completion) } /* - * Use -1 in the nsec value of the busy waiting timespec to tell that - * we are spinning in kipmid looking for something and not delaying - * between checks + * Use -1 as a special constant to tell that we are spinning in kipmid + * looking for something and not delaying between checks */ -static inline void ipmi_si_set_not_busy(struct timespec *ts) -{ - ts->tv_nsec = -1; -} -static inline int ipmi_si_is_busy(struct timespec *ts) -{ - return ts->tv_nsec != -1; -} - +#define IPMI_TIME_NOT_BUSY ns_to_ktime(-1ull) static inline bool ipmi_thread_busy_wait(enum si_sm_result smi_result, const struct smi_info *smi_info, - struct timespec *busy_until) + ktime_t *busy_until) { unsigned int max_busy_us = 0; if (smi_info->si_num < num_max_busy_us) max_busy_us = kipmid_max_busy_us[smi_info->si_num]; if (max_busy_us == 0 || smi_result != SI_SM_CALL_WITH_DELAY) - ipmi_si_set_not_busy(busy_until); - else if (!ipmi_si_is_busy(busy_until)) { - ktime_get_ts(busy_until); - timespec_add_ns(busy_until, max_busy_us * NSEC_PER_USEC); + *busy_until = IPMI_TIME_NOT_BUSY; + else if (*busy_until == IPMI_TIME_NOT_BUSY) { + *busy_until = ktime_get() + max_busy_us * NSEC_PER_USEC; } else { - struct timespec now; - - ktime_get_ts(&now); - if (unlikely(timespec_compare(&now, busy_until) > 0)) { - ipmi_si_set_not_busy(busy_until); + if (unlikely(ktime_get() > *busy_until)) { + *busy_until = IPMI_TIME_NOT_BUSY; return false; } } @@ -988,9 +975,8 @@ static int ipmi_thread(void *data) struct smi_info *smi_info = data; unsigned long flags; enum si_sm_result smi_result; - struct timespec busy_until = { 0, 0 }; + ktime_t busy_until = IPMI_TIME_NOT_BUSY; - ipmi_si_set_not_busy(&busy_until); set_user_nice(current, MAX_NICE); while (!kthread_should_stop()) { int busy_wait;
'struct timespec' is getting removed from the kernel. The usage in ipmi was fixed before in commit 48862ea2ce86 ("ipmi: Update timespec usage to timespec64"), but unfortunately it crept back in. The busy looping code can better use ktime_t anyway, so use that there to simplify the implementation. Fixes: cbb19cb1eef0 ("ipmi_si: Convert timespec64 to timespec") Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> --- drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c | 40 +++++++++++--------------------- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) -- 2.20.0