Message ID | CAKohponQQphBGv9jUCF9_r2NQs7T=wkaWp_d5oO3RT=mY_zqcg@mail.gmail.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
On Monday, June 24, 2013 06:46:39 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 24 June 2013 18:53, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > > You can do > > > > if (WARN(transition_ongoing, "<text>")) > > return; > > > > and below analogously. > > Ahh.. stupid code.. Check if this fixup is fine (attached too) Looks OK, but since transition_ongoing is either 0 or 1 now, as far as I can say, it would be better to make it a bool and use = true/false instead of ++/-- I suppose. Thanks, Rafael > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c > index 6624694..6ca7eac 100644 > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c > @@ -267,10 +267,9 @@ void __cpufreq_notify_transition(struct > cpufreq_policy *policy, > switch (state) { > > case CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE: > - if (transition_ongoing) { > - WARN(1, "In middle of another frequency transition\n"); > + if (WARN(transition_ongoing, > + "In middle of another frequency transition\n")) > return; > - } > > transition_ongoing++; > > @@ -293,10 +292,9 @@ void __cpufreq_notify_transition(struct > cpufreq_policy *policy, > break; > > case CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE: > - if (!transition_ongoing) { > - WARN(1, "No frequency transition in progress\n"); > + if (WARN(!transition_ongoing, > + "No frequency transition in progress\n")) > return; > - } > > transition_ongoing--;
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c index 6624694..6ca7eac 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c @@ -267,10 +267,9 @@ void __cpufreq_notify_transition(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, switch (state) { case CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE: - if (transition_ongoing) { - WARN(1, "In middle of another frequency transition\n"); + if (WARN(transition_ongoing, + "In middle of another frequency transition\n")) return; - } transition_ongoing++;