======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.5.0-rc7-next-20200123 #7329 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
alsactl/1105 is trying to acquire lock:
ed4f7cf4 (&card->dapm_mutex){+.+.}, at: max98090_shdn_save+0x1c/0x28
but task is already holding lock:
edb8d49c (&card->controls_rwsem){++++}, at: snd_ctl_ioctl+0xcc/0xbb8
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #1 (&card->controls_rwsem){++++}:
snd_ctl_add_replace+0x3c/0x84
dapm_create_or_share_kcontrol+0x24c/0x2e0
snd_soc_dapm_new_widgets+0x308/0x594
snd_soc_bind_card+0x834/0xa94
devm_snd_soc_register_card+0x34/0x6c
odroid_audio_probe+0x288/0x34c
platform_drv_probe+0x6c/0xa4
really_probe+0x200/0x48c
driver_probe_device+0x78/0x1f8
bus_for_each_drv+0x74/0xb8
__device_attach+0xd4/0x16c
bus_probe_device+0x88/0x90
deferred_probe_work_func+0x3c/0xd0
process_one_work+0x230/0x7bc
worker_thread+0x44/0x524
kthread+0x130/0x164
ret_from_fork+0x14/0x20
0x0
-> #0 (&card->dapm_mutex){+.+.}:
lock_acquire+0xe8/0x270
__mutex_lock+0x9c/0xb18
mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24
max98090_shdn_save+0x1c/0x28
max98090_put_enum_double+0x20/0x40
snd_ctl_ioctl+0x190/0xbb8
ksys_ioctl+0x484/0xb10
ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x28
0xbede0564
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&card->controls_rwsem);
lock(&card->dapm_mutex);
lock(&card->controls_rwsem);
lock(&card->dapm_mutex);
*** DEADLOCK ***
1 lock held by alsactl/1105:
#0: edb8d49c (&card->controls_rwsem){++++}, at: snd_ctl_ioctl+0xcc/0xbb8
stack backtrace:
CPU: 2 PID: 1105 Comm: alsactl Not tainted 5.5.0-rc7-next-20200123 #7329
Hardware name: Samsung Exynos (Flattened Device Tree)
[<c01126f0>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c010e1e8>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
[<c010e1e8>] (show_stack) from [<c0b5234c>] (dump_stack+0xb4/0xe0)
[<c0b5234c>] (dump_stack) from [<c018a610>] (check_noncircular+0x1ec/0x208)
[<c018a610>] (check_noncircular) from [<c018ca2c>] (__lock_acquire+0x1210/0x25ec)
[<c018ca2c>] (__lock_acquire) from [<c018e728>] (lock_acquire+0xe8/0x270)
[<c018e728>] (lock_acquire) from [<c0b71928>] (__mutex_lock+0x9c/0xb18)
[<c0b71928>] (__mutex_lock) from [<c0b723c0>] (mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24)
[<c0b723c0>] (mutex_lock_nested) from [<c086097c>] (max98090_shdn_save+0x1c/0x28)
[<c086097c>] (max98090_shdn_save) from [<c08613f8>] (max98090_put_enum_double+0x20/0x40)
[<c08613f8>] (max98090_put_enum_double) from [<c0833f20>] (snd_ctl_ioctl+0x190/0xbb8)
[<c0833f20>] (snd_ctl_ioctl) from [<c02cae14>] (ksys_ioctl+0x484/0xb10)
[<c02cae14>] (ksys_ioctl) from [<c0101000>] (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x28)
Exception stack(0xed331fa8 to 0xed331ff0)
...
Fixes: 08df0d9a00f7 ("ASoC: max98090: revert "ASoC: max98090: fix lockdep warning"")
Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
---
sound/soc/codecs/max98090.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
@@ -52,7 +52,8 @@ static void max98090_shdn_restore_locked(struct max98090_priv *max98090)
static void max98090_shdn_save(struct max98090_priv *max98090)
{
- mutex_lock(&max98090->component->card->dapm_mutex);
+ mutex_lock_nested(&max98090->component->card->dapm_mutex,
+ SND_SOC_DAPM_CLASS_RUNTIME);
max98090_shdn_save_locked(max98090);
}
Commit 08df0d9a00f7 ("ASoC: max98090: revert "ASoC: max98090: fix lockdep warning"") provided a good rationale for removing separate lock for the SHDN register access. However it restored the lockdep warning during the system boot. To silence the lockdep warning, mark the mutex taken in the max98090_shdn_save() function with the lockdep class dedicated for the runtime DAPM operations: SND_SOC_DAPM_CLASS_RUNTIME. This finally fixes the following lockdep warning observed on Exynos4412-based Odroid U3 board: