@@ -37,4 +37,3 @@ CONFIG_IPV6_SIT=m
CONFIG_BPF_JIT=y
CONFIG_BPF_LSM=y
CONFIG_SECURITY=y
-CONFIG_TCP_CONG_DCTCP=y
@@ -59,12 +59,12 @@ static __inline int verify_cc(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx,
static __inline int set_cc(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
{
- char dctcp[TCP_CA_NAME_MAX] = "dctcp";
+ char reno[TCP_CA_NAME_MAX] = "reno";
char cubic[TCP_CA_NAME_MAX] = "cubic";
- if (bpf_setsockopt(ctx, SOL_TCP, TCP_CONGESTION, &dctcp, sizeof(dctcp)))
+ if (bpf_setsockopt(ctx, SOL_TCP, TCP_CONGESTION, &reno, sizeof(reno)))
return 1;
- if (verify_cc(ctx, dctcp))
+ if (verify_cc(ctx, reno))
return 1;
if (bpf_setsockopt(ctx, SOL_TCP, TCP_CONGESTION, &cubic, sizeof(cubic)))
Andrey pointed out that we can use reno instead of dctcp for CC tests and drop CONFIG_TCP_CONG_DCTCP=y requirement. Fixes: beecf11bc218 ("bpf: Bpf_{g,s}etsockopt for struct bpf_sock_addr") Suggested-by: Andrey Ignatov <rdna@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config | 1 - tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/connect4_prog.c | 6 +++--- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)