@@ -217,13 +217,13 @@ static unsigned char rx_ring[RX_BUF_LEN + 16] __aligned(4);
#define EE_READ_CMD 6
#define EE_ERASE_CMD 7
-static void rtl8139_eeprom_delay(uintptr_t regbase)
+static void rtl8139_eeprom_delay(struct rtl8139_priv *priv)
{
/*
* Delay between EEPROM clock transitions.
* No extra delay is needed with 33MHz PCI, but 66MHz may change this.
*/
- inl(regbase + RTL_REG_CFG9346);
+ inl(priv->ioaddr + RTL_REG_CFG9346);
}
static int rtl8139_read_eeprom(struct rtl8139_priv *priv,
@@ -237,32 +237,32 @@ static int rtl8139_read_eeprom(struct rtl8139_priv *priv,
outb(EE_ENB & ~EE_CS, ee_addr);
outb(EE_ENB, ee_addr);
- rtl8139_eeprom_delay(priv->ioaddr);
+ rtl8139_eeprom_delay(priv);
/* Shift the read command bits out. */
for (i = 4 + addr_len; i >= 0; i--) {
dataval = (read_cmd & BIT(i)) ? EE_DATA_WRITE : 0;
outb(EE_ENB | dataval, ee_addr);
- rtl8139_eeprom_delay(priv->ioaddr);
+ rtl8139_eeprom_delay(priv);
outb(EE_ENB | dataval | EE_SHIFT_CLK, ee_addr);
- rtl8139_eeprom_delay(priv->ioaddr);
+ rtl8139_eeprom_delay(priv);
}
outb(EE_ENB, ee_addr);
- rtl8139_eeprom_delay(priv->ioaddr);
+ rtl8139_eeprom_delay(priv);
for (i = 16; i > 0; i--) {
outb(EE_ENB | EE_SHIFT_CLK, ee_addr);
- rtl8139_eeprom_delay(priv->ioaddr);
+ rtl8139_eeprom_delay(priv);
retval <<= 1;
retval |= inb(ee_addr) & EE_DATA_READ;
outb(EE_ENB, ee_addr);
- rtl8139_eeprom_delay(priv->ioaddr);
+ rtl8139_eeprom_delay(priv);
}
/* Terminate the EEPROM access. */
outb(~EE_CS, ee_addr);
- rtl8139_eeprom_delay(priv->ioaddr);
+ rtl8139_eeprom_delay(priv);
return retval;
}
Instead of always calling rtl8139_eeprom_delay() with priv->ioaddr, call it with priv and let the function access priv->ioaddr. This reduces code duplication and has no impact, since the compiler will inline this as needed anyway. Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas at gmail.com> Cc: Joe Hershberger <joe.hershberger at ni.com> --- drivers/net/rtl8139.c | 18 +++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)