[21/30] net: eepro100: Drop inline keyword

Drop the inline keyword from the static functions, the compiler has a
much better overview and can decide how to inline those functions much
better.

Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas at gmail.com>
---
 drivers/net/eepro100.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 7:43 PM Marek Vasut <marek.vasut at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Drop the inline keyword from the static functions, the compiler has a
> much better overview and can decide how to inline those functions much
> better.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas at gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/eepro100.c | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/eepro100.c b/drivers/net/eepro100.c
> index a8d617c7e8..4446251e11 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/eepro100.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/eepro100.c
> @@ -209,23 +209,23 @@ static const char i82558_config_cmd[] = {
>  #define phys_to_bus(a) pci_phys_to_mem((pci_dev_t)dev->priv, a)
>  #endif
>
> -static inline int INW(struct eth_device *dev, u_long addr)
> +static int INW(struct eth_device *dev, u_long addr)
>  {
>         return le16_to_cpu(readw(addr + (void *)dev->iobase));
>  }
>
> -static inline void OUTW(struct eth_device *dev, int command, u_long addr)
> +static void OUTW(struct eth_device *dev, int command, u_long addr)
>  {
>         writew(cpu_to_le16(command), addr + (void *)dev->iobase);
>  }
>
> -static inline void OUTL(struct eth_device *dev, int command, u_long addr)
> +static void OUTL(struct eth_device *dev, int command, u_long addr)
>  {
>         writel(cpu_to_le32(command), addr + (void *)dev->iobase);
>  }
>
>  #if defined(CONFIG_MII) || defined(CONFIG_CMD_MII)
> -static inline int INL(struct eth_device *dev, u_long addr)
> +static int INL(struct eth_device *dev, u_long addr)
>  {
>         return le32_to_cpu(readl(addr + (void *)dev->iobase));
>  }
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Actually, AFAIK even if inline is used the compiled is free to do
whatever he wants,
this is only a suggestion, there's a GCC property named always_inline
which forces the compiler to inline.