Message ID | 1393755764.19684.33.camel@hastur.hellion.org.uk |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-linus test] 25340: regressions - FAIL"): > On Sun, 2014-03-02 at 10:17 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote: > > I could just bump the number of registered MACs up, but I think it would > > be better to understand what is going on. Any ideas? > > Ah, the MAC addresses are per flight not per job, so it's other jobs > which have used them. I looked through 25340 and the largest I saw > was ...:20. So: > > -----8<------------------- > > >From 4c9f108f119d704bf87bdaea4ab810ed1b0ed28d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com> > Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2014 10:21:27 +0000 > Subject: [PATCH] CXFabric: Register more MAC addresses with the fabric > > I've seen 0x20 used in a single flight. Register up to 0x40. > > Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com> Acked-by: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com> Committed-by: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>
diff --git a/Osstest/CXFabric.pm b/Osstest/CXFabric.pm index 866aefe..6c8400e 100644 --- a/Osstest/CXFabric.pm +++ b/Osstest/CXFabric.pm @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ sub setup_cxfabric($) # is unlikely to be anything other than exactly our marilith box. return unless $ho->{Flags}{'equiv-marilith'}; - my $nr = 8; + my $nr = 64; my $prefix = ether_prefix($ho); logm("Registering $nr MAC addresses with CX fabric using prefix $prefix");