@@ -62,15 +62,18 @@ static void ionic_lif_deferred_work(struct work_struct *work)
struct ionic_deferred *def = &lif->deferred;
struct ionic_deferred_work *w = NULL;
- spin_lock_bh(&def->lock);
- if (!list_empty(&def->list)) {
- w = list_first_entry(&def->list,
- struct ionic_deferred_work, list);
- list_del(&w->list);
- }
- spin_unlock_bh(&def->lock);
+ do {
+ spin_lock_bh(&def->lock);
+ if (!list_empty(&def->list)) {
+ w = list_first_entry(&def->list,
+ struct ionic_deferred_work, list);
+ list_del(&w->list);
+ }
+ spin_unlock_bh(&def->lock);
+
+ if (!w)
+ break;
- if (w) {
switch (w->type) {
case IONIC_DW_TYPE_RX_MODE:
ionic_lif_rx_mode(lif, w->rx_mode);
@@ -94,8 +97,8 @@ static void ionic_lif_deferred_work(struct work_struct *work)
break;
}
kfree(w);
- schedule_work(&def->work);
- }
+ w = NULL;
+ } while (true);
}
void ionic_lif_deferred_enqueue(struct ionic_deferred *def,
Check through our work list for additional items. This normally will only have one item, but occasionally may have another job waiting. There really is no need reschedule ourself here. Reported-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Shannon Nelson <snelson@pensando.io> --- .../net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic_lif.c | 23 +++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)