Message ID | 20201013232014.26044-3-dwilder@us.ibm.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | ibmveth gso fix. | expand |
On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 7:21 PM David Wilder <dwilder@us.ibm.com> wrote: > > Ingress large send packets are identified by either: > The IBMVETH_RXQ_LRG_PKT flag in the receive buffer > or with a -1 placed in the ip header checksum. > The method used depends on firmware version. Frame > geometry and sufficient header validation is performed by the > hypervisor eliminating the need for further header checks here. > > Fixes: 7b5967389f5a ("ibmveth: set correct gso_size and gso_type") > Signed-off-by: David Wilder <dwilder@us.ibm.com> > Reviewed-by: Thomas Falcon <tlfalcon@linux.ibm.com> > Reviewed-by: Cristobal Forno <cris.forno@ibm.com> > Reviewed-by: Pradeep Satyanarayana <pradeeps@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com> Thanks for clarifying the header validation. I clearly had missed that :)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmveth.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmveth.c index 3935a7e22ce5..7ef3369953b6 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmveth.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmveth.c @@ -1349,6 +1349,7 @@ static int ibmveth_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget) int offset = ibmveth_rxq_frame_offset(adapter); int csum_good = ibmveth_rxq_csum_good(adapter); int lrg_pkt = ibmveth_rxq_large_packet(adapter); + __sum16 iph_check = 0; skb = ibmveth_rxq_get_buffer(adapter); @@ -1385,7 +1386,17 @@ static int ibmveth_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget) skb_put(skb, length); skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(skb, netdev); - if (length > netdev->mtu + ETH_HLEN) { + /* PHYP without PLSO support places a -1 in the ip + * checksum for large send frames. + */ + if (skb->protocol == cpu_to_be16(ETH_P_IP)) { + struct iphdr *iph = (struct iphdr *)skb->data; + + iph_check = iph->check; + } + + if ((length > netdev->mtu + ETH_HLEN) || + lrg_pkt || iph_check == 0xffff) { ibmveth_rx_mss_helper(skb, mss, lrg_pkt); adapter->rx_large_packets++; }