diff mbox

[v10,05/12] ARM/ARM64: KVM: Make kvm_psci_call() return convention more flexible

Message ID 1398085206-30555-6-git-send-email-anup.patel@linaro.org
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Anup Patel April 21, 2014, 12:59 p.m. UTC 
Currently, the kvm_psci_call() returns 'true' or 'false' based on whether
the PSCI function call was handled successfully or not. This does not help
us emulate system-level PSCI functions where the actual emulation work will
be done by user space (QEMU or KVMTOOL). Examples of such system-level PSCI
functions are: PSCI v0.2 SYSTEM_OFF and SYSTEM_RESET.

This patch updates kvm_psci_call() to return three types of values:
1) > 0 (success)
2) = 0 (success but exit to user space)
3) < 0 (errors)

Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup.patel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar <pranavkumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
---
 arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_psci.h   |    2 +-
 arch/arm/kvm/handle_exit.c        |   10 +++++++---
 arch/arm/kvm/psci.c               |   28 ++++++++++++++++------------
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_psci.h |    2 +-
 arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c      |   10 +++++++---
 5 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

Comments

Christoffer Dall April 28, 2014, 2:17 p.m. UTC | #1 
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 06:29:59PM +0530, Anup Patel wrote:
> Currently, the kvm_psci_call() returns 'true' or 'false' based on whether
> the PSCI function call was handled successfully or not. This does not help
> us emulate system-level PSCI functions where the actual emulation work will
> be done by user space (QEMU or KVMTOOL). Examples of such system-level PSCI
> functions are: PSCI v0.2 SYSTEM_OFF and SYSTEM_RESET.
> 
> This patch updates kvm_psci_call() to return three types of values:
> 1) > 0 (success)
> 2) = 0 (success but exit to user space)
> 3) < 0 (errors)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup.patel@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar <pranavkumar@linaro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>

Marc, do you still have comments on this one?

-Christoffer
Marc Zyngier April 28, 2014, 2:27 p.m. UTC | #2 
On Mon, Apr 28 2014 at  3:17:43 pm BST, Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 06:29:59PM +0530, Anup Patel wrote:
>> Currently, the kvm_psci_call() returns 'true' or 'false' based on whether
>> the PSCI function call was handled successfully or not. This does not help
>> us emulate system-level PSCI functions where the actual emulation work will
>> be done by user space (QEMU or KVMTOOL). Examples of such system-level PSCI
>> functions are: PSCI v0.2 SYSTEM_OFF and SYSTEM_RESET.
>> 
>> This patch updates kvm_psci_call() to return three types of values:
>> 1) > 0 (success)
>> 2) = 0 (success but exit to user space)
>> 3) < 0 (errors)
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup.patel@linaro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar <pranavkumar@linaro.org>
>> Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
>
> Marc, do you still have comments on this one?

No, this one is OK:

Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>

	M.
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_psci.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_psci.h
index 4c0e3e1..6bda945 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_psci.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_psci.h
@@ -22,6 +22,6 @@ 
 #define KVM_ARM_PSCI_0_2	2
 
 int kvm_psci_version(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
-bool kvm_psci_call(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
+int kvm_psci_call(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 
 #endif /* __ARM_KVM_PSCI_H__ */
diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/handle_exit.c b/arch/arm/kvm/handle_exit.c
index 0de91fc..4c979d4 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kvm/handle_exit.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kvm/handle_exit.c
@@ -38,14 +38,18 @@  static int handle_svc_hyp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
 
 static int handle_hvc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
 {
+	int ret;
+
 	trace_kvm_hvc(*vcpu_pc(vcpu), *vcpu_reg(vcpu, 0),
 		      kvm_vcpu_hvc_get_imm(vcpu));
 
-	if (kvm_psci_call(vcpu))
+	ret = kvm_psci_call(vcpu);
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		kvm_inject_undefined(vcpu);
 		return 1;
+	}
 
-	kvm_inject_undefined(vcpu);
-	return 1;
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static int handle_smc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/psci.c b/arch/arm/kvm/psci.c
index 8c42596c..14e6fa6 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kvm/psci.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kvm/psci.c
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@  int kvm_psci_version(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	return KVM_ARM_PSCI_0_1;
 }
 
-static bool kvm_psci_0_2_call(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+static int kvm_psci_0_2_call(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	unsigned long psci_fn = *vcpu_reg(vcpu, 0) & ~((u32) 0);
 	unsigned long val;
@@ -128,14 +128,14 @@  static bool kvm_psci_0_2_call(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		val = PSCI_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED;
 		break;
 	default:
-		return false;
+		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
 	*vcpu_reg(vcpu, 0) = val;
-	return true;
+	return 1;
 }
 
-static bool kvm_psci_0_1_call(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+static int kvm_psci_0_1_call(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	unsigned long psci_fn = *vcpu_reg(vcpu, 0) & ~((u32) 0);
 	unsigned long val;
@@ -153,11 +153,11 @@  static bool kvm_psci_0_1_call(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		val = PSCI_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED;
 		break;
 	default:
-		return false;
+		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
 	*vcpu_reg(vcpu, 0) = val;
-	return true;
+	return 1;
 }
 
 /**
@@ -165,12 +165,16 @@  static bool kvm_psci_0_1_call(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
  * @vcpu: Pointer to the VCPU struct
  *
  * Handle PSCI calls from guests through traps from HVC instructions.
- * The calling convention is similar to SMC calls to the secure world where
- * the function number is placed in r0 and this function returns true if the
- * function number specified in r0 is withing the PSCI range, and false
- * otherwise.
+ * The calling convention is similar to SMC calls to the secure world
+ * where the function number is placed in r0.
+ *
+ * This function returns: > 0 (success), 0 (success but exit to user
+ * space), and < 0 (errors)
+ *
+ * Errors:
+ * -EINVAL: Unrecognized PSCI function
  */
-bool kvm_psci_call(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+int kvm_psci_call(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	switch (kvm_psci_version(vcpu)) {
 	case KVM_ARM_PSCI_0_2:
@@ -178,6 +182,6 @@  bool kvm_psci_call(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	case KVM_ARM_PSCI_0_1:
 		return kvm_psci_0_1_call(vcpu);
 	default:
-		return false;
+		return -EINVAL;
 	};
 }
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_psci.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_psci.h
index e25c658..bc39e55 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_psci.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_psci.h
@@ -22,6 +22,6 @@ 
 #define KVM_ARM_PSCI_0_2	2
 
 int kvm_psci_version(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
-bool kvm_psci_call(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
+int kvm_psci_call(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 
 #endif /* __ARM64_KVM_PSCI_H__ */
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
index 7bc41ea..182415e 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
@@ -30,11 +30,15 @@  typedef int (*exit_handle_fn)(struct kvm_vcpu *, struct kvm_run *);
 
 static int handle_hvc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
 {
-	if (kvm_psci_call(vcpu))
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = kvm_psci_call(vcpu);
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		kvm_inject_undefined(vcpu);
 		return 1;
+	}
 
-	kvm_inject_undefined(vcpu);
-	return 1;
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static int handle_smc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)