diff mbox series

scsi: ufs: fix no clkgating due to tag being alive

Message ID 20201016060259.390029-1-jaegeuk@kernel.org
State New
Headers show
Series scsi: ufs: fix no clkgating due to tag being alive | expand

Commit Message

Jaegeuk Kim Oct. 16, 2020, 6:02 a.m. UTC
The below call stack prevents clk_gating at every IO completion.
We can remove the condition, ufshcd_any_tag_in_use(), since clkgating_work
will check it again.

ufshcd_complete_requests(struct ufs_hba *hba)
  ufshcd_transfer_req_compl()
    __ufshcd_transfer_req_compl()
      __ufshcd_release(hba)
        if (ufshcd_any_tag_in_use() == 1)
           return;
  ufshcd_tmc_handler(hba);
    blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter();

Cc: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>
Cc: Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com>
Cc: Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Jaegeuk Kim Oct. 16, 2020, 9:18 p.m. UTC | #1
The below call stack prevents clk_gating at every IO completion.
We can remove the condition, ufshcd_any_tag_in_use(), since clkgating_work
will check it again.

ufshcd_complete_requests(struct ufs_hba *hba)
  ufshcd_transfer_req_compl()
    __ufshcd_transfer_req_compl()
      __ufshcd_release(hba)
        if (ufshcd_any_tag_in_use() == 1)
           return;
  ufshcd_tmc_handler(hba);
    blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter();

In addition, we have to avoid gate_work, if it was disabled.

Cc: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>
Cc: Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com>
Cc: Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
---

Change log from v1:
 - change the patch subject
 - fix clkgate.is_enable to work

 drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 5 +++--
 drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h | 5 +++++
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
index a2db8182663d..75e8a76f20c7 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
@@ -1729,9 +1729,10 @@ static void __ufshcd_release(struct ufs_hba *hba)
 
 	if (hba->clk_gating.active_reqs || hba->clk_gating.is_suspended
 		|| hba->ufshcd_state != UFSHCD_STATE_OPERATIONAL
-		|| ufshcd_any_tag_in_use(hba) || hba->outstanding_tasks
+		|| hba->outstanding_tasks
 		|| hba->active_uic_cmd || hba->uic_async_done
-		|| ufshcd_eh_in_progress(hba))
+		|| ufshcd_eh_in_progress(hba)
+		|| ufshcd_is_clkgating_enabled(hba))
 		return;
 
 	hba->clk_gating.state = REQ_CLKS_OFF;
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
index 8344d8cb3678..09e59cb86e69 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
@@ -814,6 +814,11 @@ static inline bool ufshcd_is_auto_hibern8_supported(struct ufs_hba *hba)
 		!(hba->quirks & UFSHCD_QUIRK_BROKEN_AUTO_HIBERN8);
 }
 
+static inline bool ufshcd_is_clkgating_enabled(struct ufs_hba *hba)
+{
+	return hba->clk_gating.is_enabled;
+}
+
 static inline bool ufshcd_is_auto_hibern8_enabled(struct ufs_hba *hba)
 {
 	return FIELD_GET(UFSHCI_AHIBERN8_TIMER_MASK, hba->ahit) ? true : false;
Can Guo Oct. 19, 2020, 9:18 a.m. UTC | #2
On 2020-10-17 05:18, jaegeuk@kernel.org wrote:
> The below call stack prevents clk_gating at every IO completion.

> We can remove the condition, ufshcd_any_tag_in_use(), since 

> clkgating_work

> will check it again.


Thanks for fixing it, actually we have noticed this for a while.
It used to work well, please add a Fixes tag or mention the commit
which breaks clk gating functionality - the commit which introduces
func ufshcd_any_tag_in_use().

Regards,

Can Guo.

> 

> ufshcd_complete_requests(struct ufs_hba *hba)

>   ufshcd_transfer_req_compl()

>     __ufshcd_transfer_req_compl()

>       __ufshcd_release(hba)

>         if (ufshcd_any_tag_in_use() == 1)

>            return;

>   ufshcd_tmc_handler(hba);

>     blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter();

> 

> In addition, we have to avoid gate_work, if it was disabled.

> 

> Cc: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>

> Cc: Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com>

> Cc: Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>

> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>

> ---

> 

> Change log from v1:

>  - change the patch subject

>  - fix clkgate.is_enable to work

> 

>  drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 5 +++--

>  drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h | 5 +++++

>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

> 

> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c

> index a2db8182663d..75e8a76f20c7 100644

> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c

> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c

> @@ -1729,9 +1729,10 @@ static void __ufshcd_release(struct ufs_hba 

> *hba)

> 

>  	if (hba->clk_gating.active_reqs || hba->clk_gating.is_suspended

>  		|| hba->ufshcd_state != UFSHCD_STATE_OPERATIONAL

> -		|| ufshcd_any_tag_in_use(hba) || hba->outstanding_tasks

> +		|| hba->outstanding_tasks

>  		|| hba->active_uic_cmd || hba->uic_async_done

> -		|| ufshcd_eh_in_progress(hba))

> +		|| ufshcd_eh_in_progress(hba)

> +		|| ufshcd_is_clkgating_enabled(hba))

>  		return;

> 

>  	hba->clk_gating.state = REQ_CLKS_OFF;

> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h

> index 8344d8cb3678..09e59cb86e69 100644

> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h

> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h

> @@ -814,6 +814,11 @@ static inline bool

> ufshcd_is_auto_hibern8_supported(struct ufs_hba *hba)

>  		!(hba->quirks & UFSHCD_QUIRK_BROKEN_AUTO_HIBERN8);

>  }

> 

> +static inline bool ufshcd_is_clkgating_enabled(struct ufs_hba *hba)

> +{

> +	return hba->clk_gating.is_enabled;

> +}

> +

>  static inline bool ufshcd_is_auto_hibern8_enabled(struct ufs_hba *hba)

>  {

>  	return FIELD_GET(UFSHCI_AHIBERN8_TIMER_MASK, hba->ahit) ? true : 

> false;
Can Guo Oct. 20, 2020, 10:57 a.m. UTC | #3
On 2020-10-17 05:18, jaegeuk@kernel.org wrote:
> The below call stack prevents clk_gating at every IO completion.

> We can remove the condition, ufshcd_any_tag_in_use(), since 

> clkgating_work

> will check it again.

> 

> ufshcd_complete_requests(struct ufs_hba *hba)

>   ufshcd_transfer_req_compl()

>     __ufshcd_transfer_req_compl()

>       __ufshcd_release(hba)

>         if (ufshcd_any_tag_in_use() == 1)

>            return;

>   ufshcd_tmc_handler(hba);

>     blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter();

> 

> In addition, we have to avoid gate_work, if it was disabled.

> 

> Cc: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>

> Cc: Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com>

> Cc: Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>

> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>

> ---

> 

> Change log from v1:

>  - change the patch subject

>  - fix clkgate.is_enable to work

> 

>  drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 5 +++--

>  drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h | 5 +++++

>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

> 

> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c

> index a2db8182663d..75e8a76f20c7 100644

> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c

> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c

> @@ -1729,9 +1729,10 @@ static void __ufshcd_release(struct ufs_hba 

> *hba)

> 

>  	if (hba->clk_gating.active_reqs || hba->clk_gating.is_suspended

>  		|| hba->ufshcd_state != UFSHCD_STATE_OPERATIONAL

> -		|| ufshcd_any_tag_in_use(hba) || hba->outstanding_tasks

> +		|| hba->outstanding_tasks

>  		|| hba->active_uic_cmd || hba->uic_async_done

> -		|| ufshcd_eh_in_progress(hba))

> +		|| ufshcd_eh_in_progress(hba)

> +		|| ufshcd_is_clkgating_enabled(hba))


I guess you want it to be "!ufshcd_is_clkgating_enabled(hba)" - if
clk gating is enabled, we should let gating happen but not bail, right?

That said, I don't think we need to check whether clk gating is enabled 
or
not here, since ufshcd_clkgating_store() manipulates 
clk_gating->active_reqs
in an atomic way. If someone disables clk gating -> 
clk_gating->active_reqs++,
this check becomes TURE on the very first condition.

So the very fisrt patch looks better to me.

Thanks,

Can Guo.

>  		return;

> 

>  	hba->clk_gating.state = REQ_CLKS_OFF;

> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h

> index 8344d8cb3678..09e59cb86e69 100644

> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h

> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h

> @@ -814,6 +814,11 @@ static inline bool

> ufshcd_is_auto_hibern8_supported(struct ufs_hba *hba)

>  		!(hba->quirks & UFSHCD_QUIRK_BROKEN_AUTO_HIBERN8);

>  }

> 

> +static inline bool ufshcd_is_clkgating_enabled(struct ufs_hba *hba)

> +{

> +	return hba->clk_gating.is_enabled;

> +}

> +

>  static inline bool ufshcd_is_auto_hibern8_enabled(struct ufs_hba *hba)

>  {

>  	return FIELD_GET(UFSHCI_AHIBERN8_TIMER_MASK, hba->ahit) ? true : 

> false;
Jaegeuk Kim Oct. 20, 2020, 7:17 p.m. UTC | #4
On 10/20, Can Guo wrote:
> On 2020-10-17 05:18, jaegeuk@kernel.org wrote:

> > The below call stack prevents clk_gating at every IO completion.

> > We can remove the condition, ufshcd_any_tag_in_use(), since

> > clkgating_work

> > will check it again.

> > 

> > ufshcd_complete_requests(struct ufs_hba *hba)

> >   ufshcd_transfer_req_compl()

> >     __ufshcd_transfer_req_compl()

> >       __ufshcd_release(hba)

> >         if (ufshcd_any_tag_in_use() == 1)

> >            return;

> >   ufshcd_tmc_handler(hba);

> >     blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter();

> > 

> > In addition, we have to avoid gate_work, if it was disabled.

> > 

> > Cc: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>

> > Cc: Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com>

> > Cc: Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>

> > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>

> > ---

> > 

> > Change log from v1:

> >  - change the patch subject

> >  - fix clkgate.is_enable to work

> > 

> >  drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 5 +++--

> >  drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h | 5 +++++

> >  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

> > 

> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c

> > index a2db8182663d..75e8a76f20c7 100644

> > --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c

> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c

> > @@ -1729,9 +1729,10 @@ static void __ufshcd_release(struct ufs_hba *hba)

> > 

> >  	if (hba->clk_gating.active_reqs || hba->clk_gating.is_suspended

> >  		|| hba->ufshcd_state != UFSHCD_STATE_OPERATIONAL

> > -		|| ufshcd_any_tag_in_use(hba) || hba->outstanding_tasks

> > +		|| hba->outstanding_tasks

> >  		|| hba->active_uic_cmd || hba->uic_async_done

> > -		|| ufshcd_eh_in_progress(hba))

> > +		|| ufshcd_eh_in_progress(hba)

> > +		|| ufshcd_is_clkgating_enabled(hba))

> 

> I guess you want it to be "!ufshcd_is_clkgating_enabled(hba)" - if

> clk gating is enabled, we should let gating happen but not bail, right?

> 

> That said, I don't think we need to check whether clk gating is enabled or

> not here, since ufshcd_clkgating_store() manipulates clk_gating->active_reqs

> in an atomic way. If someone disables clk gating ->

> clk_gating->active_reqs++,

> this check becomes TURE on the very first condition.


Yeah, I found the above and and was testing it locally. Anyway, it seems you're
right. Let me give it a try back again.

Thanks,

> 

> So the very fisrt patch looks better to me.

> 

> Thanks,

> 

> Can Guo.

> 

> >  		return;

> > 

> >  	hba->clk_gating.state = REQ_CLKS_OFF;

> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h

> > index 8344d8cb3678..09e59cb86e69 100644

> > --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h

> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h

> > @@ -814,6 +814,11 @@ static inline bool

> > ufshcd_is_auto_hibern8_supported(struct ufs_hba *hba)

> >  		!(hba->quirks & UFSHCD_QUIRK_BROKEN_AUTO_HIBERN8);

> >  }

> > 

> > +static inline bool ufshcd_is_clkgating_enabled(struct ufs_hba *hba)

> > +{

> > +	return hba->clk_gating.is_enabled;

> > +}

> > +

> >  static inline bool ufshcd_is_auto_hibern8_enabled(struct ufs_hba *hba)

> >  {

> >  	return FIELD_GET(UFSHCI_AHIBERN8_TIMER_MASK, hba->ahit) ? true :

> > false;
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
index 1d157ff58d81..22fecb9a4ec2 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
@@ -1727,7 +1727,7 @@  static void __ufshcd_release(struct ufs_hba *hba)
 
 	if (hba->clk_gating.active_reqs || hba->clk_gating.is_suspended
 		|| hba->ufshcd_state != UFSHCD_STATE_OPERATIONAL
-		|| ufshcd_any_tag_in_use(hba) || hba->outstanding_tasks
+		|| hba->outstanding_tasks
 		|| hba->active_uic_cmd || hba->uic_async_done
 		|| ufshcd_eh_in_progress(hba))
 		return;