| Message ID | 20201019113240.11516-1-geert@linux-m68k.org |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | mptcp: MPTCP_KUNIT_TESTS should depend on MPTCP instead of selecting it | expand |
Hi Geert, Thank you for the patch! On 19/10/2020 13:32, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > MPTCP_KUNIT_TESTS selects MPTCP, thus enabling an optional feature the > user may not want to enable. Fix this by making the test depend on > MPTCP instead. I think the initial intension was to select MPTCP to have an easy way to enable all KUnit tests. We imitated what was and is still done in fs/ext4/Kconfig. But it probably makes sense to depend on MPTCP instead of selecting it. So that's fine for me. But then please also send a patch to ext4 maintainer to do the same there. Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net> Cheers, Matt -- Tessares | Belgium | Hybrid Access Solutions www.tessares.net
Hi Matthieu, On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 5:47 PM Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net> wrote: > On 19/10/2020 13:32, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > MPTCP_KUNIT_TESTS selects MPTCP, thus enabling an optional feature the > > user may not want to enable. Fix this by making the test depend on > > MPTCP instead. > > I think the initial intension was to select MPTCP to have an easy way to > enable all KUnit tests. We imitated what was and is still done in > fs/ext4/Kconfig. > > But it probably makes sense to depend on MPTCP instead of selecting it. > So that's fine for me. But then please also send a patch to ext4 > maintainer to do the same there. Thanks, good point. I didn't notice, as I did have ext4 enabled anyway. Will send a patch for ext4. Looks like ext4 and MPTCP where the only test modules selecting their dependencies. > Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net> Thanks! Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 10:38 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 5:47 PM Matthieu Baerts > <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net> wrote: > > On 19/10/2020 13:32, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > MPTCP_KUNIT_TESTS selects MPTCP, thus enabling an optional feature the > > > user may not want to enable. Fix this by making the test depend on > > > MPTCP instead. > > > > I think the initial intension was to select MPTCP to have an easy way to > > enable all KUnit tests. We imitated what was and is still done in > > fs/ext4/Kconfig. > > > > But it probably makes sense to depend on MPTCP instead of selecting it. > > So that's fine for me. But then please also send a patch to ext4 > > maintainer to do the same there. > > Thanks, good point. I didn't notice, as I did have ext4 enabled anyway. > Will send a patch for ext4. Looks like ext4 and MPTCP where the only > test modules selecting their dependencies. FTR, "[PATCH] ext: EXT4_KUNIT_TESTS should depend on EXT4_FS instead of selecting it" https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201020073740.29081-1-geert@linux-m68k.org/ Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
Hi Geert, On 20/10/2020 09:40, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 10:38 PM Geert Uytterhoeven > <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 5:47 PM Matthieu Baerts >> <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net> wrote: >>> On 19/10/2020 13:32, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >>>> MPTCP_KUNIT_TESTS selects MPTCP, thus enabling an optional feature the >>>> user may not want to enable. Fix this by making the test depend on >>>> MPTCP instead. >>> >>> I think the initial intension was to select MPTCP to have an easy way to >>> enable all KUnit tests. We imitated what was and is still done in >>> fs/ext4/Kconfig. >>> >>> But it probably makes sense to depend on MPTCP instead of selecting it. >>> So that's fine for me. But then please also send a patch to ext4 >>> maintainer to do the same there. >> >> Thanks, good point. I didn't notice, as I did have ext4 enabled anyway. >> Will send a patch for ext4. Looks like ext4 and MPTCP where the only >> test modules selecting their dependencies. > > FTR, "[PATCH] ext: EXT4_KUNIT_TESTS should depend on EXT4_FS instead > of selecting it" > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201020073740.29081-1-geert@linux-m68k.org/ Thank you for having sent this other patch and shared the link here! Groetjes, Matt -- Tessares | Belgium | Hybrid Access Solutions www.tessares.net
On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 17:47:20 +0200 Matthieu Baerts wrote: > On 19/10/2020 13:32, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > MPTCP_KUNIT_TESTS selects MPTCP, thus enabling an optional feature the > > user may not want to enable. Fix this by making the test depend on > > MPTCP instead. > > Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net> Applied, thanks!
diff --git a/net/mptcp/Kconfig b/net/mptcp/Kconfig index 698bc35251609755..abb0a992d4a0855a 100644 --- a/net/mptcp/Kconfig +++ b/net/mptcp/Kconfig @@ -22,11 +22,8 @@ config MPTCP_IPV6 select IPV6 default y -endif - config MPTCP_KUNIT_TESTS tristate "This builds the MPTCP KUnit tests" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS - select MPTCP depends on KUNIT default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS help @@ -39,3 +36,4 @@ config MPTCP_KUNIT_TESTS If unsure, say N. +endif
MPTCP_KUNIT_TESTS selects MPTCP, thus enabling an optional feature the user may not want to enable. Fix this by making the test depend on MPTCP instead. Fixes: a00a582203dbc43e ("mptcp: move crypto test to KUNIT") Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> --- net/mptcp/Kconfig | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)