Message ID | 1398865178-12577-1-git-send-email-dietmar.eggemann@arm.com |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Commit | caffcdd8d27ba78730d5540396ce72ad022aff2c |
Headers | show |
Hi Peter, On 30/04/14 14:39, Dietmar Eggemann wrote: > From: Dietmar Eggemann <Dietmar.Eggemann@arm.com> > > There is no need to zero struct sched_group member cpumask and struct > sched_group_power member power since both structures are already allocated > as zeroed memory in __sdt_alloc(). > > This patch has been tested with > BUG_ON(!cpumask_empty(sched_group_cpus(sg))); and BUG_ON(sg->sgp->power); > in build_sched_groups() on ARM TC2 and INTEL i5 M520 platform including > CPU hotplug scenarios. > > Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> > --- > kernel/sched/core.c | 2 -- > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c > index 9cae286824bb..6bc51aebbf1b 100644 > --- a/kernel/sched/core.c > +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c > @@ -5807,8 +5807,6 @@ build_sched_groups(struct sched_domain *sd, int cpu) > continue; > > group = get_group(i, sdd, &sg); > - cpumask_clear(sched_group_cpus(sg)); > - sg->sgp->power = 0; > cpumask_setall(sched_group_mask(sg)); > > for_each_cpu(j, span) { > I think this one slipped through the cracks. Could you have a look? Thanks, -- Dietmar -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 09:32:53AM +0100, Dietmar Eggemann wrote: > Hi Peter, > > On 30/04/14 14:39, Dietmar Eggemann wrote: > > From: Dietmar Eggemann <Dietmar.Eggemann@arm.com> > > > > There is no need to zero struct sched_group member cpumask and struct > > sched_group_power member power since both structures are already allocated > > as zeroed memory in __sdt_alloc(). > > > > This patch has been tested with > > BUG_ON(!cpumask_empty(sched_group_cpus(sg))); and BUG_ON(sg->sgp->power); > > in build_sched_groups() on ARM TC2 and INTEL i5 M520 platform including > > CPU hotplug scenarios. > > > > Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> > > --- > > kernel/sched/core.c | 2 -- > > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c > > index 9cae286824bb..6bc51aebbf1b 100644 > > --- a/kernel/sched/core.c > > +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c > > @@ -5807,8 +5807,6 @@ build_sched_groups(struct sched_domain *sd, int cpu) > > continue; > > > > group = get_group(i, sdd, &sg); > > - cpumask_clear(sched_group_cpus(sg)); > > - sg->sgp->power = 0; > > cpumask_setall(sched_group_mask(sg)); > > > > for_each_cpu(j, span) { > > > > I think this one slipped through the cracks. Could you have a look? Yeah, got stuck in the backlog :/ Seems simple enough, queued it, we'll see if anything explodes ;-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c index 9cae286824bb..6bc51aebbf1b 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/core.c +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c @@ -5807,8 +5807,6 @@ build_sched_groups(struct sched_domain *sd, int cpu) continue; group = get_group(i, sdd, &sg); - cpumask_clear(sched_group_cpus(sg)); - sg->sgp->power = 0; cpumask_setall(sched_group_mask(sg)); for_each_cpu(j, span) {