diff mbox series

vmbus: Don't make QOM property registration conditional

Message ID 20201009200701.1830060-1-ehabkost@redhat.com
State Accepted
Commit 80cc1a0dd19cc414ddaa3f1b9b6ef91e3ebc12b2
Headers show
Series vmbus: Don't make QOM property registration conditional | expand

Commit Message

Eduardo Habkost Oct. 9, 2020, 8:07 p.m. UTC
Having properties registered conditionally makes QOM type
introspection difficult.  Instead of skipping registration of the
"instanceid" property, always register the property but validate
its value against the instance id required by the class.

Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
---
Note: due to the lack of concrete vmbus-dev subclasses in the
QEMU tree, this patch couldn't be tested.
---
 hw/hyperv/vmbus.c | 20 +++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Comments

Maciej S. Szmigiero Oct. 9, 2020, 9:05 p.m. UTC | #1
On 09.10.2020 22:07, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> Having properties registered conditionally makes QOM type

> introspection difficult.  Instead of skipping registration of the

> "instanceid" property, always register the property but validate

> its value against the instance id required by the class.

> 

> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>

> ---

> Note: due to the lack of concrete vmbus-dev subclasses in the

> QEMU tree, this patch couldn't be tested.


Will test it tomorrow since I have a VMBus device implementation.

Maciej
Eduardo Habkost Oct. 9, 2020, 9:33 p.m. UTC | #2
On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 11:05:47PM +0200, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
> On 09.10.2020 22:07, Eduardo Habkost wrote:

> > Having properties registered conditionally makes QOM type

> > introspection difficult.  Instead of skipping registration of the

> > "instanceid" property, always register the property but validate

> > its value against the instance id required by the class.

> > 

> > Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>

> > ---

> > Note: due to the lack of concrete vmbus-dev subclasses in the

> > QEMU tree, this patch couldn't be tested.

> 

> Will test it tomorrow since I have a VMBus device implementation.


Thanks!

Is anybody willing to volunteer to be listed as maintainer (or
reviewer, at least) of hw/hyperv/vmbus.c?

-- 
Eduardo
Maciej S. Szmigiero Oct. 10, 2020, 11:30 p.m. UTC | #3
On 09.10.2020 23:33, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 11:05:47PM +0200, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:

>> On 09.10.2020 22:07, Eduardo Habkost wrote:

>>> Having properties registered conditionally makes QOM type

>>> introspection difficult.  Instead of skipping registration of the

>>> "instanceid" property, always register the property but validate

>>> its value against the instance id required by the class.

>>>

>>> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>

>>> ---

>>> Note: due to the lack of concrete vmbus-dev subclasses in the

>>> QEMU tree, this patch couldn't be tested.

>>

>> Will test it tomorrow since I have a VMBus device implementation.

> 

> Thanks!

> 


Tested the patch with a hv-balloon device and is seems to work okay, so:
Acked-by: Maciej S. Szmigiero <maciej.szmigiero@oracle.com>


Maciej
Maciej S. Szmigiero April 25, 2021, 12:21 p.m. UTC | #4
On 11.10.2020 01:30, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
> On 09.10.2020 23:33, Eduardo Habkost wrote:

>> On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 11:05:47PM +0200, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:

>>> On 09.10.2020 22:07, Eduardo Habkost wrote:

>>>> Having properties registered conditionally makes QOM type

>>>> introspection difficult.  Instead of skipping registration of the

>>>> "instanceid" property, always register the property but validate

>>>> its value against the instance id required by the class.

>>>>

>>>> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>

>>>> ---

>>>> Note: due to the lack of concrete vmbus-dev subclasses in the

>>>> QEMU tree, this patch couldn't be tested.

>>>

>>> Will test it tomorrow since I have a VMBus device implementation.

>>

>> Thanks!

>>

> 

> Tested the patch with a hv-balloon device and is seems to work okay, so:

> Acked-by: Maciej S. Szmigiero <maciej.szmigiero@oracle.com>

> 


I see this patch wasn't picked up - it still makes sense and applies
cleanly to the current git, so I think it should be picked up.

Thanks,
Maciej
Eduardo Habkost April 27, 2021, 8:45 p.m. UTC | #5
On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 02:21:38PM +0200, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
> On 11.10.2020 01:30, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:

> > On 09.10.2020 23:33, Eduardo Habkost wrote:

> > > On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 11:05:47PM +0200, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:

> > > > On 09.10.2020 22:07, Eduardo Habkost wrote:

> > > > > Having properties registered conditionally makes QOM type

> > > > > introspection difficult.  Instead of skipping registration of the

> > > > > "instanceid" property, always register the property but validate

> > > > > its value against the instance id required by the class.

> > > > > 

> > > > > Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>

> > > > > ---

> > > > > Note: due to the lack of concrete vmbus-dev subclasses in the

> > > > > QEMU tree, this patch couldn't be tested.

> > > > 

> > > > Will test it tomorrow since I have a VMBus device implementation.

> > > 

> > > Thanks!

> > > 

> > 

> > Tested the patch with a hv-balloon device and is seems to work okay, so:

> > Acked-by: Maciej S. Szmigiero <maciej.szmigiero@oracle.com>

> > 

> 

> I see this patch wasn't picked up - it still makes sense and applies

> cleanly to the current git, so I think it should be picked up.


I'm queueing it for 6.1, thanks for the reminder!

-- 
Eduardo
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/hw/hyperv/vmbus.c b/hw/hyperv/vmbus.c
index 896e981f85..481d7e8d3c 100644
--- a/hw/hyperv/vmbus.c
+++ b/hw/hyperv/vmbus.c
@@ -2371,6 +2371,14 @@  static void vmbus_dev_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
 
     assert(!qemu_uuid_is_null(&vdev->instanceid));
 
+    if (!qemu_uuid_is_null(&vdc->instanceid)) {
+        /* Class wants to only have a single instance with a fixed UUID */
+        if (!qemu_uuid_is_equal(&vdev->instanceid, &vdc->instanceid)) {
+            error_setg(&err, "instance id can't be changed");
+            goto error_out;
+        }
+    }
+
     /* Check for instance id collision for this class id */
     QTAILQ_FOREACH(child, &BUS(vmbus)->children, sibling) {
         VMBusDevice *child_dev = VMBUS_DEVICE(child->child);
@@ -2437,18 +2445,22 @@  static void vmbus_dev_unrealize(DeviceState *dev)
     free_channels(vdev);
 }
 
+static Property vmbus_dev_props[] = {
+    DEFINE_PROP_UUID("instanceid", VMBusDevice, instanceid),
+    DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST()
+};
+
+
 static void vmbus_dev_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data)
 {
     DeviceClass *kdev = DEVICE_CLASS(klass);
+    device_class_set_props(kdev, vmbus_dev_props);
     kdev->bus_type = TYPE_VMBUS;
     kdev->realize = vmbus_dev_realize;
     kdev->unrealize = vmbus_dev_unrealize;
     kdev->reset = vmbus_dev_reset;
 }
 
-static Property vmbus_dev_instanceid =
-                        DEFINE_PROP_UUID("instanceid", VMBusDevice, instanceid);
-
 static void vmbus_dev_instance_init(Object *obj)
 {
     VMBusDevice *vdev = VMBUS_DEVICE(obj);
@@ -2457,8 +2469,6 @@  static void vmbus_dev_instance_init(Object *obj)
     if (!qemu_uuid_is_null(&vdc->instanceid)) {
         /* Class wants to only have a single instance with a fixed UUID */
         vdev->instanceid = vdc->instanceid;
-    } else {
-        qdev_property_add_static(DEVICE(vdev), &vmbus_dev_instanceid);
     }
 }