Message ID | 1403218403-3303-1-git-send-email-denis@denix.org |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 06:53:22PM -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > From: Denys Dmytriyenko <denys@ti.com> > > Make probing of "platform" bus conditional based on PROBE_PLATFORM_BUS > variable from /etc/default/udev-cache on subsequent boots when udev > cache is used. PROBE_PLATFORM_BUS has to be set to "yes" in order to > force probing on every boot, otherwise it uses the old default behaviour > of probing it just the first time. > > This is helpful on modern SoCs where most of the low level peripheral > drivers are registered on the platform bus and need to be probed to load > the necessary modules and enable the connected buses and subsystems. Any questions, comments? I would like to keep a dialog open on this one. Thanks. > Signed-off-by: Denys Dmytriyenko <denys@ti.com> > --- > meta/recipes-core/udev/udev/init | 7 ++++++- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/udev/udev/init b/meta/recipes-core/udev/udev/init > index 410a650..f2c84d5 100644 > --- a/meta/recipes-core/udev/udev/init > +++ b/meta/recipes-core/udev/udev/init > @@ -102,7 +102,12 @@ case "$1" in > > udevadm control --env=STARTUP=1 > if [ "$not_first_boot" != "" ];then > - udevadm trigger --action=add --subsystem-nomatch=tty --subsystem-nomatch=mem --subsystem-nomatch=vc --subsystem-nomatch=vtconsole --subsystem-nomatch=misc --subsystem-nomatch=dcon --subsystem-nomatch=pci_bus --subsystem-nomatch=graphics --subsystem-nomatch=backlight --subsystem-nomatch=video4linux --subsystem-nomatch=platform > + if [ "$PROBE_PLATFORM_BUS" != "yes" ]; then > + PLATFORM_BUS_NOMATCH="--subsystem-nomatch=platform" > + else > + PLATFORM_BUS_NOMATCH="" > + fi > + udevadm trigger --action=add --subsystem-nomatch=tty --subsystem-nomatch=mem --subsystem-nomatch=vc --subsystem-nomatch=vtconsole --subsystem-nomatch=misc --subsystem-nomatch=dcon --subsystem-nomatch=pci_bus --subsystem-nomatch=graphics --subsystem-nomatch=backlight --subsystem-nomatch=video4linux $PLATFORM_BUS_NOMATCH > (udevadm settle --timeout=3; udevadm control --env=STARTUP=)& > else > udevadm trigger --action=add > -- > 2.0.0 > > -- > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Ping? Any comments? Any better suggestions? On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 01:13:38PM -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 06:53:22PM -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > > From: Denys Dmytriyenko <denys@ti.com> > > > > Make probing of "platform" bus conditional based on PROBE_PLATFORM_BUS > > variable from /etc/default/udev-cache on subsequent boots when udev > > cache is used. PROBE_PLATFORM_BUS has to be set to "yes" in order to > > force probing on every boot, otherwise it uses the old default behaviour > > of probing it just the first time. > > > > This is helpful on modern SoCs where most of the low level peripheral > > drivers are registered on the platform bus and need to be probed to load > > the necessary modules and enable the connected buses and subsystems. > > Any questions, comments? I would like to keep a dialog open on this one. > Thanks. > > > > Signed-off-by: Denys Dmytriyenko <denys@ti.com> > > --- > > meta/recipes-core/udev/udev/init | 7 ++++++- > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/udev/udev/init b/meta/recipes-core/udev/udev/init > > index 410a650..f2c84d5 100644 > > --- a/meta/recipes-core/udev/udev/init > > +++ b/meta/recipes-core/udev/udev/init > > @@ -102,7 +102,12 @@ case "$1" in > > > > udevadm control --env=STARTUP=1 > > if [ "$not_first_boot" != "" ];then > > - udevadm trigger --action=add --subsystem-nomatch=tty --subsystem-nomatch=mem --subsystem-nomatch=vc --subsystem-nomatch=vtconsole --subsystem-nomatch=misc --subsystem-nomatch=dcon --subsystem-nomatch=pci_bus --subsystem-nomatch=graphics --subsystem-nomatch=backlight --subsystem-nomatch=video4linux --subsystem-nomatch=platform > > + if [ "$PROBE_PLATFORM_BUS" != "yes" ]; then > > + PLATFORM_BUS_NOMATCH="--subsystem-nomatch=platform" > > + else > > + PLATFORM_BUS_NOMATCH="" > > + fi > > + udevadm trigger --action=add --subsystem-nomatch=tty --subsystem-nomatch=mem --subsystem-nomatch=vc --subsystem-nomatch=vtconsole --subsystem-nomatch=misc --subsystem-nomatch=dcon --subsystem-nomatch=pci_bus --subsystem-nomatch=graphics --subsystem-nomatch=backlight --subsystem-nomatch=video4linux $PLATFORM_BUS_NOMATCH > > (udevadm settle --timeout=3; udevadm control --env=STARTUP=)& > > else > > udevadm trigger --action=add > > -- > > 2.0.0 > > > > -- > > _______________________________________________ > > Openembedded-core mailing list > > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core > -- > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
On Tuesday 24 June 2014 20:52:55 Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> Ping? Any comments? Any better suggestions?
Looks like Richard has merged this, FWIW.
Cheers,
Paul
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 05:20:23PM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Tuesday 24 June 2014 20:52:55 Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > > Ping? Any comments? Any better suggestions? > > Looks like Richard has merged this, FWIW. Yes, I saw it. Already submitted backport for daisy... :)
On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 12:22 -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 05:20:23PM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: > > On Tuesday 24 June 2014 20:52:55 Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > > > Ping? Any comments? Any better suggestions? > > > > Looks like Richard has merged this, FWIW. > > Yes, I saw it. Already submitted backport for daisy... :) I'd like this to see some testing in master for a while before we backport it... Cheers, Richard
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 7:53 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko <denis@denix.org> wrote: > From: Denys Dmytriyenko <denys@ti.com> > > Make probing of "platform" bus conditional based on PROBE_PLATFORM_BUS > variable from /etc/default/udev-cache on subsequent boots when udev > cache is used. PROBE_PLATFORM_BUS has to be set to "yes" in order to > force probing on every boot, otherwise it uses the old default behaviour > of probing it just the first time. > > This is helpful on modern SoCs where most of the low level peripheral > drivers are registered on the platform bus and need to be probed to load > the necessary modules and enable the connected buses and subsystems. > > Signed-off-by: Denys Dmytriyenko <denys@ti.com> I second this as this fixes a issue in Wandboard in meta-fsl-arm as well. John, this fix is equivalent to the one we had tested.
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 11:41:05PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 12:22 -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 05:20:23PM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: > > > On Tuesday 24 June 2014 20:52:55 Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > > > > Ping? Any comments? Any better suggestions? > > > > > > Looks like Richard has merged this, FWIW. > > > > Yes, I saw it. Already submitted backport for daisy... :) > > I'd like this to see some testing in master for a while before we > backport it... I'm Ok waiting a bit longer to test it in master. I'll ping on it later... But this fixes a very common issue that affects different platforms from different BSP layers, including BeagleBone Black in meta-yocto-bsp. The goal is to be least intrusive and preserve the old udev cache behavior as much as possible. Alternative options were to disable udev cache completely or forcefully load necessary modules when they won't be probed on subsequent boots.
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 01:43:53PM -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 11:41:05PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 12:22 -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 05:20:23PM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: > > > > On Tuesday 24 June 2014 20:52:55 Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > > > > > Ping? Any comments? Any better suggestions? > > > > > > > > Looks like Richard has merged this, FWIW. > > > > > > Yes, I saw it. Already submitted backport for daisy... :) > > > > I'd like this to see some testing in master for a while before we > > backport it... > > I'm Ok waiting a bit longer to test it in master. I'll ping on it later... > > But this fixes a very common issue that affects different platforms from > different BSP layers, including BeagleBone Black in meta-yocto-bsp. The goal > is to be least intrusive and preserve the old udev cache behavior as much as > possible. Alternative options were to disable udev cache completely or > forcefully load necessary modules when they won't be probed on subsequent > boots. Hi, Richard, Was it enough wait time to get the change tested in master? Should I re-submit the patch for daisy one more time or you have it in the archives? Thanks!
On 07/14/2014 07:41 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 01:43:53PM -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 11:41:05PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: >>> On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 12:22 -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: >>>> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 05:20:23PM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: >>>>> On Tuesday 24 June 2014 20:52:55 Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: >>>>>> Ping? Any comments? Any better suggestions? >>>>> >>>>> Looks like Richard has merged this, FWIW. >>>> >>>> Yes, I saw it. Already submitted backport for daisy... :) >>> >>> I'd like this to see some testing in master for a while before we >>> backport it... >> >> I'm Ok waiting a bit longer to test it in master. I'll ping on it later... >> >> But this fixes a very common issue that affects different platforms from >> different BSP layers, including BeagleBone Black in meta-yocto-bsp. The goal >> is to be least intrusive and preserve the old udev cache behavior as much as >> possible. Alternative options were to disable udev cache completely or >> forcefully load necessary modules when they won't be probed on subsequent >> boots. > > Hi, Richard, > > Was it enough wait time to get the change tested in master? Should I re-submit > the patch for daisy one more time or you have it in the archives? Thanks! > I have it in my daisy-next (1.6.2) branch (I know it's not in daisy yet). Sau!
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 08:30:04AM -0700, Saul Wold wrote: > On 07/14/2014 07:41 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > >On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 01:43:53PM -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > >>On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 11:41:05PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > >>>On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 12:22 -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > >>>>On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 05:20:23PM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: > >>>>>On Tuesday 24 June 2014 20:52:55 Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > >>>>>>Ping? Any comments? Any better suggestions? > >>>>> > >>>>>Looks like Richard has merged this, FWIW. > >>>> > >>>>Yes, I saw it. Already submitted backport for daisy... :) > >>> > >>>I'd like this to see some testing in master for a while before we > >>>backport it... > >> > >>I'm Ok waiting a bit longer to test it in master. I'll ping on it later... > >> > >>But this fixes a very common issue that affects different platforms from > >>different BSP layers, including BeagleBone Black in meta-yocto-bsp. The goal > >>is to be least intrusive and preserve the old udev cache behavior as much as > >>possible. Alternative options were to disable udev cache completely or > >>forcefully load necessary modules when they won't be probed on subsequent > >>boots. > > > >Hi, Richard, > > > >Was it enough wait time to get the change tested in master? Should I re-submit > >the patch for daisy one more time or you have it in the archives? Thanks! > > > I have it in my daisy-next (1.6.2) branch (I know it's not in daisy yet). Thanks!
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 11:38:41AM -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 08:30:04AM -0700, Saul Wold wrote: > > On 07/14/2014 07:41 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > > >On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 01:43:53PM -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > > >>On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 11:41:05PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > > >>>On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 12:22 -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > > >>>>On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 05:20:23PM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: > > >>>>>On Tuesday 24 June 2014 20:52:55 Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > > >>>>>>Ping? Any comments? Any better suggestions? > > >>>>> > > >>>>>Looks like Richard has merged this, FWIW. > > >>>> > > >>>>Yes, I saw it. Already submitted backport for daisy... :) > > >>> > > >>>I'd like this to see some testing in master for a while before we > > >>>backport it... > > >> > > >>I'm Ok waiting a bit longer to test it in master. I'll ping on it later... > > >> > > >>But this fixes a very common issue that affects different platforms from > > >>different BSP layers, including BeagleBone Black in meta-yocto-bsp. The goal > > >>is to be least intrusive and preserve the old udev cache behavior as much as > > >>possible. Alternative options were to disable udev cache completely or > > >>forcefully load necessary modules when they won't be probed on subsequent > > >>boots. > > > > > >Hi, Richard, > > > > > >Was it enough wait time to get the change tested in master? Should I re-submit > > >the patch for daisy one more time or you have it in the archives? Thanks! > > > > > I have it in my daisy-next (1.6.2) branch (I know it's not in daisy yet). > > Thanks! Saul, Do you have any ETA on when daisy will be updated? Thanks.
diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/udev/udev/init b/meta/recipes-core/udev/udev/init index 410a650..f2c84d5 100644 --- a/meta/recipes-core/udev/udev/init +++ b/meta/recipes-core/udev/udev/init @@ -102,7 +102,12 @@ case "$1" in udevadm control --env=STARTUP=1 if [ "$not_first_boot" != "" ];then - udevadm trigger --action=add --subsystem-nomatch=tty --subsystem-nomatch=mem --subsystem-nomatch=vc --subsystem-nomatch=vtconsole --subsystem-nomatch=misc --subsystem-nomatch=dcon --subsystem-nomatch=pci_bus --subsystem-nomatch=graphics --subsystem-nomatch=backlight --subsystem-nomatch=video4linux --subsystem-nomatch=platform + if [ "$PROBE_PLATFORM_BUS" != "yes" ]; then + PLATFORM_BUS_NOMATCH="--subsystem-nomatch=platform" + else + PLATFORM_BUS_NOMATCH="" + fi + udevadm trigger --action=add --subsystem-nomatch=tty --subsystem-nomatch=mem --subsystem-nomatch=vc --subsystem-nomatch=vtconsole --subsystem-nomatch=misc --subsystem-nomatch=dcon --subsystem-nomatch=pci_bus --subsystem-nomatch=graphics --subsystem-nomatch=backlight --subsystem-nomatch=video4linux $PLATFORM_BUS_NOMATCH (udevadm settle --timeout=3; udevadm control --env=STARTUP=)& else udevadm trigger --action=add