diff mbox series

[08/11] rtw88: coex: fix BT performance drop during initial/power-on step

Message ID 20201111022108.9834-9-pkshih@realtek.com
State New
Headers show
Series rtw88: coex: fix and update settings to enhance coex performance | expand

Commit Message

Ping-Ke Shih Nov. 11, 2020, 2:21 a.m. UTC
From: Ching-Te Ku <ku920601@realtek.com>

Force set the coexistence to BT high priority during
WLAN initial/power-on step. Since the duration the related setting
may be not ready yet.

The score board is not related to scan when initialing, remove the scan
parameter.

Signed-off-by: Ching-Te Ku <ku920601@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/coex.c | 8 +++++---
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Comments

Ping-Ke Shih Nov. 12, 2020, 2:24 a.m. UTC | #1
> -----Original Message-----

> From: kvalo=codeaurora.org@mg.codeaurora.org [mailto:kvalo=codeaurora.org@mg.codeaurora.org] On

> Behalf Of Kalle Valo

> Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2020 4:38 PM

> To: Pkshih

> Cc: tony0620emma@gmail.com; linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org

> Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/11] rtw88: coex: fix BT performance drop during initial/power-on step

> 

> <pkshih@realtek.com> writes:

> 

> > From: Ching-Te Ku <ku920601@realtek.com>

> >

> > Force set the coexistence to BT high priority during

> > WLAN initial/power-on step. Since the duration the related setting

> > may be not ready yet.

> >

> > The score board is not related to scan when initialing, remove the scan

> > parameter.

> >

> > Signed-off-by: Ching-Te Ku <ku920601@realtek.com>

> > Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>

> > ---

> >  drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/coex.c | 8 +++++---

> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

> >

> > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/coTÔÈ

> b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/coex.c8Ilex.cc7216245557..6ec3f45a64c1 100644

> 

> Something is wrong here, the new lines are replaced with '^H' control

> character.

> 


I don't know why it goes wrong, my patch source looks ok. 
I'll pay attention to this patch while sending v2.

---
Ping-Ke
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/coTÔÈ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/coex.c8Ilex.cc7216245557..6ec3f45a64c1 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/coex.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/coex.c
@@ -2369,19 +2369,19 @@  static void __rtw_coex_init_hw_config(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, bool wifi_only)
 			__func__);
 	} else if (wifi_only) {
 		rtw_coex_set_ant_path(rtwdev, true, COEX_SET_ANT_WONLY);
-		rtw_coex_write_scbd(rtwdev, COEX_SCBD_ACTIVE | COEX_SCBD_SCAN,
+		rtw_coex_write_scbd(rtwdev, COEX_SCBD_ACTIVE | COEX_SCBD_ONOFF,
 				    true);
 		coex->stop_dm = true;
 	} else {
 		rtw_coex_set_ant_path(rtwdev, true, COEX_SET_ANT_INIT);
-		rtw_coex_write_scbd(rtwdev, COEX_SCBD_ACTIVE | COEX_SCBD_SCAN,
+		rtw_coex_write_scbd(rtwdev, COEX_SCBD_ACTIVE | COEX_SCBD_ONOFF,
 				    true);
 		coex->stop_dm = false;
 		coex->freeze = true;
 	}
 
 	/* PTA parameter */
-	rtw_coex_table(rtwdev, false, 0);
+	rtw_coex_table(rtwdev, true, 1);
 	rtw_coex_tdma(rtwdev, true, 0);
 	rtw_coex_query_bt_info(rtwdev);
 }
@@ -2389,6 +2389,7 @@  static void __rtw_coex_init_hw_config(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, bool wifi_only)
 void rtw_coex_power_on_setting(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev)
 {
 	struct rtw_coex *coex = &rtwdev->coex;
+	u8 table_case = 1;
 
 	rtw_dbg(rtwdev, RTW_DBG_COEX, "[BTCoex], %s()\n", __func__);
 
@@ -2405,6 +2406,7 @@  void rtw_coex_power_on_setting(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev)
 	/* set antenna path to BT */
 	rtw_coex_set_ant_path(rtwdev, true, COEX_SET_ANT_POWERON);
 
+	rtw_coex_table(rtwdev, true, table_case);
 	/* red x issue */
 	rtw_write8(rtwdev, 0xff1a, 0x0);
 }