diff mbox series

[v2,07/17] driver core: Add fwnode_init()

Message ID 20201121020232.908850-8-saravanak@google.com
State Accepted
Commit 01bb86b380a306bd937c96da36f66429f3362137
Headers show
Series Refactor fw_devlink to significantly improve boot time | expand

Commit Message

Saravana Kannan Nov. 21, 2020, 2:02 a.m. UTC
There are multiple locations in the kernel where a struct fwnode_handle
is initialized. Add fwnode_init() so that we have one way of
initializing a fwnode_handle.

Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/property.c         | 2 +-
 drivers/acpi/scan.c             | 2 +-
 drivers/base/swnode.c           | 2 +-
 drivers/firmware/efi/efi-init.c | 8 ++++----
 include/linux/fwnode.h          | 6 ++++++
 include/linux/of.h              | 2 +-
 kernel/irq/irqdomain.c          | 2 +-
 7 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

Comments

Leon Romanovsky Dec. 6, 2020, 7:26 a.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 06:02:22PM -0800, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> There are multiple locations in the kernel where a struct fwnode_handle
> is initialized. Add fwnode_init() so that we have one way of
> initializing a fwnode_handle.
>
> Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/property.c         | 2 +-
>  drivers/acpi/scan.c             | 2 +-
>  drivers/base/swnode.c           | 2 +-
>  drivers/firmware/efi/efi-init.c | 8 ++++----
>  include/linux/fwnode.h          | 6 ++++++
>  include/linux/of.h              | 2 +-
>  kernel/irq/irqdomain.c          | 2 +-
>  7 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

In this series, I didn't find any extension of fwnode_init() to be it more
than simple assignment. This change looks to me like unnecessary churn and
obfuscation rather than improvement.

"...ops = &...;" is pretty standard in the kernel to initialize ops
structures.

Thanks
Saravana Kannan Dec. 7, 2020, 7:25 p.m. UTC | #2
On Sat, Dec 5, 2020 at 11:26 PM Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 06:02:22PM -0800, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> > There are multiple locations in the kernel where a struct fwnode_handle
> > is initialized. Add fwnode_init() so that we have one way of
> > initializing a fwnode_handle.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/acpi/property.c         | 2 +-
> >  drivers/acpi/scan.c             | 2 +-
> >  drivers/base/swnode.c           | 2 +-
> >  drivers/firmware/efi/efi-init.c | 8 ++++----
> >  include/linux/fwnode.h          | 6 ++++++
> >  include/linux/of.h              | 2 +-
> >  kernel/irq/irqdomain.c          | 2 +-
> >  7 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> In this series, I didn't find any extension of fwnode_init() to be it more
> than simple assignment. This change looks to me like unnecessary churn and
> obfuscation rather than improvement.
>
> "...ops = &...;" is pretty standard in the kernel to initialize ops
> structures.

Subsequent patches make fwnode_init() do more stuff.

-Saravana
Leon Romanovsky Dec. 7, 2020, 7:53 p.m. UTC | #3
On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 11:25:15AM -0800, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 5, 2020 at 11:26 PM Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org> wrote:

> >

> > On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 06:02:22PM -0800, Saravana Kannan wrote:

> > > There are multiple locations in the kernel where a struct fwnode_handle

> > > is initialized. Add fwnode_init() so that we have one way of

> > > initializing a fwnode_handle.

> > >

> > > Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>

> > > ---

> > >  drivers/acpi/property.c         | 2 +-

> > >  drivers/acpi/scan.c             | 2 +-

> > >  drivers/base/swnode.c           | 2 +-

> > >  drivers/firmware/efi/efi-init.c | 8 ++++----

> > >  include/linux/fwnode.h          | 6 ++++++

> > >  include/linux/of.h              | 2 +-

> > >  kernel/irq/irqdomain.c          | 2 +-

> > >  7 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

> >

> > In this series, I didn't find any extension of fwnode_init() to be it more

> > than simple assignment. This change looks to me like unnecessary churn and

> > obfuscation rather than improvement.

> >

> > "...ops = &...;" is pretty standard in the kernel to initialize ops

> > structures.

>

> Subsequent patches make fwnode_init() do more stuff.


But not in this series, right?

Thanks

>

> -Saravana
Saravana Kannan Dec. 7, 2020, 8:36 p.m. UTC | #4
On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 11:54 AM Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 11:25:15AM -0800, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 5, 2020 at 11:26 PM Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 06:02:22PM -0800, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> > > > There are multiple locations in the kernel where a struct fwnode_handle
> > > > is initialized. Add fwnode_init() so that we have one way of
> > > > initializing a fwnode_handle.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/acpi/property.c         | 2 +-
> > > >  drivers/acpi/scan.c             | 2 +-
> > > >  drivers/base/swnode.c           | 2 +-
> > > >  drivers/firmware/efi/efi-init.c | 8 ++++----
> > > >  include/linux/fwnode.h          | 6 ++++++
> > > >  include/linux/of.h              | 2 +-
> > > >  kernel/irq/irqdomain.c          | 2 +-
> > > >  7 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > In this series, I didn't find any extension of fwnode_init() to be it more
> > > than simple assignment. This change looks to me like unnecessary churn and
> > > obfuscation rather than improvement.
> > >
> > > "...ops = &...;" is pretty standard in the kernel to initialize ops
> > > structures.
> >
> > Subsequent patches make fwnode_init() do more stuff.
>
> But not in this series, right?

In this series. The very next patch - Patch 8/17 :)

-Saravana
Rob Herring (Arm) Dec. 7, 2020, 10:20 p.m. UTC | #5
On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 18:02:22 -0800, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> There are multiple locations in the kernel where a struct fwnode_handle
> is initialized. Add fwnode_init() so that we have one way of
> initializing a fwnode_handle.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/property.c         | 2 +-
>  drivers/acpi/scan.c             | 2 +-
>  drivers/base/swnode.c           | 2 +-
>  drivers/firmware/efi/efi-init.c | 8 ++++----
>  include/linux/fwnode.h          | 6 ++++++
>  include/linux/of.h              | 2 +-
>  kernel/irq/irqdomain.c          | 2 +-
>  7 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 

Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Leon Romanovsky Dec. 8, 2020, 6:34 a.m. UTC | #6
On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 12:36:43PM -0800, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 11:54 AM Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org> wrote:

> >

> > On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 11:25:15AM -0800, Saravana Kannan wrote:

> > > On Sat, Dec 5, 2020 at 11:26 PM Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 06:02:22PM -0800, Saravana Kannan wrote:

> > > > > There are multiple locations in the kernel where a struct fwnode_handle

> > > > > is initialized. Add fwnode_init() so that we have one way of

> > > > > initializing a fwnode_handle.

> > > > >

> > > > > Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>

> > > > > ---

> > > > >  drivers/acpi/property.c         | 2 +-

> > > > >  drivers/acpi/scan.c             | 2 +-

> > > > >  drivers/base/swnode.c           | 2 +-

> > > > >  drivers/firmware/efi/efi-init.c | 8 ++++----

> > > > >  include/linux/fwnode.h          | 6 ++++++

> > > > >  include/linux/of.h              | 2 +-

> > > > >  kernel/irq/irqdomain.c          | 2 +-

> > > > >  7 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

> > > >

> > > > In this series, I didn't find any extension of fwnode_init() to be it more

> > > > than simple assignment. This change looks to me like unnecessary churn and

> > > > obfuscation rather than improvement.

> > > >

> > > > "...ops = &...;" is pretty standard in the kernel to initialize ops

> > > > structures.

> > >

> > > Subsequent patches make fwnode_init() do more stuff.

> >

> > But not in this series, right?

>

> In this series. The very next patch - Patch 8/17 :)


Thanks, sorry for the noise.

>

> -Saravana
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/property.c b/drivers/acpi/property.c
index d04de10a63e4..24e87b630573 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/property.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/property.c
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@  static bool acpi_nondev_subnode_extract(const union acpi_object *desc,
 		return false;
 
 	dn->name = link->package.elements[0].string.pointer;
-	dn->fwnode.ops = &acpi_data_fwnode_ops;
+	fwnode_init(&dn->fwnode, &acpi_data_fwnode_ops);
 	dn->parent = parent;
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dn->data.properties);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dn->data.subnodes);
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
index bc6a79e33220..519963bcc047 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
@@ -1589,7 +1589,7 @@  void acpi_init_device_object(struct acpi_device *device, acpi_handle handle,
 	device->device_type = type;
 	device->handle = handle;
 	device->parent = acpi_bus_get_parent(handle);
-	device->fwnode.ops = &acpi_device_fwnode_ops;
+	fwnode_init(&device->fwnode, &acpi_device_fwnode_ops);
 	acpi_set_device_status(device, sta);
 	acpi_device_get_busid(device);
 	acpi_set_pnp_ids(handle, &device->pnp, type);
diff --git a/drivers/base/swnode.c b/drivers/base/swnode.c
index 010828fc785b..4a4b2008fbc2 100644
--- a/drivers/base/swnode.c
+++ b/drivers/base/swnode.c
@@ -653,7 +653,7 @@  swnode_register(const struct software_node *node, struct swnode *parent,
 	swnode->parent = parent;
 	swnode->allocated = allocated;
 	swnode->kobj.kset = swnode_kset;
-	swnode->fwnode.ops = &software_node_ops;
+	fwnode_init(&swnode->fwnode, &software_node_ops);
 
 	ida_init(&swnode->child_ids);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&swnode->entry);
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/efi-init.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/efi-init.c
index f55a92ff12c0..b148f1459fb3 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/efi/efi-init.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/efi-init.c
@@ -359,9 +359,7 @@  static const struct fwnode_operations efifb_fwnode_ops = {
 	.add_links = efifb_add_links,
 };
 
-static struct fwnode_handle efifb_fwnode = {
-	.ops = &efifb_fwnode_ops,
-};
+static struct fwnode_handle efifb_fwnode;
 
 static int __init register_gop_device(void)
 {
@@ -375,8 +373,10 @@  static int __init register_gop_device(void)
 	if (!pd)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCI))
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCI)) {
+		fwnode_init(&efifb_fwnode, &efifb_fwnode_ops);
 		pd->dev.fwnode = &efifb_fwnode;
+	}
 
 	err = platform_device_add_data(pd, &screen_info, sizeof(screen_info));
 	if (err)
diff --git a/include/linux/fwnode.h b/include/linux/fwnode.h
index e0abafbb17f8..5589799708b5 100644
--- a/include/linux/fwnode.h
+++ b/include/linux/fwnode.h
@@ -170,6 +170,12 @@  struct fwnode_operations {
 	} while (false)
 #define get_dev_from_fwnode(fwnode)	get_device((fwnode)->dev)
 
+static inline void fwnode_init(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
+			       const struct fwnode_operations *ops)
+{
+	fwnode->ops = ops;
+}
+
 extern u32 fw_devlink_get_flags(void);
 
 #endif
diff --git a/include/linux/of.h b/include/linux/of.h
index 5d51891cbf1a..27fba2472eee 100644
--- a/include/linux/of.h
+++ b/include/linux/of.h
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@  static inline void of_node_init(struct device_node *node)
 #if defined(CONFIG_OF_KOBJ)
 	kobject_init(&node->kobj, &of_node_ktype);
 #endif
-	node->fwnode.ops = &of_fwnode_ops;
+	fwnode_init(&node->fwnode, &of_fwnode_ops);
 }
 
 #if defined(CONFIG_OF_KOBJ)
diff --git a/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c b/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
index cf8b374b892d..06fce7e39033 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@  struct fwnode_handle *__irq_domain_alloc_fwnode(unsigned int type, int id,
 	fwid->type = type;
 	fwid->name = n;
 	fwid->pa = pa;
-	fwid->fwnode.ops = &irqchip_fwnode_ops;
+	fwnode_init(&fwid->fwnode, &irqchip_fwnode_ops);
 	return &fwid->fwnode;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__irq_domain_alloc_fwnode);