Message ID | 20201124080749.69160-1-wanghai38@huawei.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | [net,v3] ipvs: fix possible memory leak in ip_vs_control_net_init | expand |
Hello, On Tue, 24 Nov 2020, Wang Hai wrote: > kmemleak report a memory leak as follows: > > BUG: memory leak > unreferenced object 0xffff8880759ea000 (size 256): > backtrace: > [<00000000c0bf2deb>] kmem_cache_zalloc include/linux/slab.h:656 [inline] > [<00000000c0bf2deb>] __proc_create+0x23d/0x7d0 fs/proc/generic.c:421 > [<000000009d718d02>] proc_create_reg+0x8e/0x140 fs/proc/generic.c:535 > [<0000000097bbfc4f>] proc_create_net_data+0x8c/0x1b0 fs/proc/proc_net.c:126 > [<00000000652480fc>] ip_vs_control_net_init+0x308/0x13a0 net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c:4169 > [<000000004c927ebe>] __ip_vs_init+0x211/0x400 net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c:2429 > [<00000000aa6b72d9>] ops_init+0xa8/0x3c0 net/core/net_namespace.c:151 > [<00000000153fd114>] setup_net+0x2de/0x7e0 net/core/net_namespace.c:341 > [<00000000be4e4f07>] copy_net_ns+0x27d/0x530 net/core/net_namespace.c:482 > [<00000000f1c23ec9>] create_new_namespaces+0x382/0xa30 kernel/nsproxy.c:110 > [<00000000098a5757>] copy_namespaces+0x2e6/0x3b0 kernel/nsproxy.c:179 > [<0000000026ce39e9>] copy_process+0x220a/0x5f00 kernel/fork.c:2072 > [<00000000b71f4efe>] _do_fork+0xc7/0xda0 kernel/fork.c:2428 > [<000000002974ee96>] __do_sys_clone3+0x18a/0x280 kernel/fork.c:2703 > [<0000000062ac0a4d>] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46 > [<0000000093f1ce2c>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 > > In the error path of ip_vs_control_net_init(), remove_proc_entry() needs > to be called to remove the added proc entry, otherwise a memory leak > will occur. > > Also, add some '#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS' because proc_create_net* return NULL > when PROC is not used. > > Fixes: b17fc9963f83 ("IPVS: netns, ip_vs_stats and its procfs") > Fixes: 61b1ab4583e2 ("IPVS: netns, add basic init per netns.") > Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com> > Signed-off-by: Wang Hai <wanghai38@huawei.com> Looks good to me, thanks! Acked-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg> > --- > v2->v3: improve code format > v1->v2: add some '#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS' and check the return value of proc_create_net* > net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------ > 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c > index e279ded4e306..d45dbcba8b49 100644 > --- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c > +++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c > @@ -4167,12 +4167,18 @@ int __net_init ip_vs_control_net_init(struct netns_ipvs *ipvs) > > spin_lock_init(&ipvs->tot_stats.lock); > > - proc_create_net("ip_vs", 0, ipvs->net->proc_net, &ip_vs_info_seq_ops, > - sizeof(struct ip_vs_iter)); > - proc_create_net_single("ip_vs_stats", 0, ipvs->net->proc_net, > - ip_vs_stats_show, NULL); > - proc_create_net_single("ip_vs_stats_percpu", 0, ipvs->net->proc_net, > - ip_vs_stats_percpu_show, NULL); > +#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS > + if (!proc_create_net("ip_vs", 0, ipvs->net->proc_net, > + &ip_vs_info_seq_ops, sizeof(struct ip_vs_iter))) > + goto err_vs; > + if (!proc_create_net_single("ip_vs_stats", 0, ipvs->net->proc_net, > + ip_vs_stats_show, NULL)) > + goto err_stats; > + if (!proc_create_net_single("ip_vs_stats_percpu", 0, > + ipvs->net->proc_net, > + ip_vs_stats_percpu_show, NULL)) > + goto err_percpu; > +#endif > > if (ip_vs_control_net_init_sysctl(ipvs)) > goto err; > @@ -4180,6 +4186,17 @@ int __net_init ip_vs_control_net_init(struct netns_ipvs *ipvs) > return 0; > > err: > +#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS > + remove_proc_entry("ip_vs_stats_percpu", ipvs->net->proc_net); > + > +err_percpu: > + remove_proc_entry("ip_vs_stats", ipvs->net->proc_net); > + > +err_stats: > + remove_proc_entry("ip_vs", ipvs->net->proc_net); > + > +err_vs: > +#endif > free_percpu(ipvs->tot_stats.cpustats); > return -ENOMEM; > } > @@ -4188,9 +4205,11 @@ void __net_exit ip_vs_control_net_cleanup(struct netns_ipvs *ipvs) > { > ip_vs_trash_cleanup(ipvs); > ip_vs_control_net_cleanup_sysctl(ipvs); > +#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS > remove_proc_entry("ip_vs_stats_percpu", ipvs->net->proc_net); > remove_proc_entry("ip_vs_stats", ipvs->net->proc_net); > remove_proc_entry("ip_vs", ipvs->net->proc_net); > +#endif > free_percpu(ipvs->tot_stats.cpustats); > } > > -- > 2.17.1 Regards -- Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 08:09:19PM +0200, Julian Anastasov wrote: > > Hello, > > On Tue, 24 Nov 2020, Wang Hai wrote: > > > kmemleak report a memory leak as follows: > > > > BUG: memory leak > > unreferenced object 0xffff8880759ea000 (size 256): > > backtrace: > > [<00000000c0bf2deb>] kmem_cache_zalloc include/linux/slab.h:656 [inline] > > [<00000000c0bf2deb>] __proc_create+0x23d/0x7d0 fs/proc/generic.c:421 > > [<000000009d718d02>] proc_create_reg+0x8e/0x140 fs/proc/generic.c:535 > > [<0000000097bbfc4f>] proc_create_net_data+0x8c/0x1b0 fs/proc/proc_net.c:126 > > [<00000000652480fc>] ip_vs_control_net_init+0x308/0x13a0 net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c:4169 > > [<000000004c927ebe>] __ip_vs_init+0x211/0x400 net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c:2429 > > [<00000000aa6b72d9>] ops_init+0xa8/0x3c0 net/core/net_namespace.c:151 > > [<00000000153fd114>] setup_net+0x2de/0x7e0 net/core/net_namespace.c:341 > > [<00000000be4e4f07>] copy_net_ns+0x27d/0x530 net/core/net_namespace.c:482 > > [<00000000f1c23ec9>] create_new_namespaces+0x382/0xa30 kernel/nsproxy.c:110 > > [<00000000098a5757>] copy_namespaces+0x2e6/0x3b0 kernel/nsproxy.c:179 > > [<0000000026ce39e9>] copy_process+0x220a/0x5f00 kernel/fork.c:2072 > > [<00000000b71f4efe>] _do_fork+0xc7/0xda0 kernel/fork.c:2428 > > [<000000002974ee96>] __do_sys_clone3+0x18a/0x280 kernel/fork.c:2703 > > [<0000000062ac0a4d>] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46 > > [<0000000093f1ce2c>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 > > > > In the error path of ip_vs_control_net_init(), remove_proc_entry() needs > > to be called to remove the added proc entry, otherwise a memory leak > > will occur. > > > > Also, add some '#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS' because proc_create_net* return NULL > > when PROC is not used. > > > > Fixes: b17fc9963f83 ("IPVS: netns, ip_vs_stats and its procfs") > > Fixes: 61b1ab4583e2 ("IPVS: netns, add basic init per netns.") > > Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com> > > Signed-off-by: Wang Hai <wanghai38@huawei.com> > > Looks good to me, thanks! > > Acked-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg> Applied, thanks.
diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c index e279ded4e306..d45dbcba8b49 100644 --- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c +++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c @@ -4167,12 +4167,18 @@ int __net_init ip_vs_control_net_init(struct netns_ipvs *ipvs) spin_lock_init(&ipvs->tot_stats.lock); - proc_create_net("ip_vs", 0, ipvs->net->proc_net, &ip_vs_info_seq_ops, - sizeof(struct ip_vs_iter)); - proc_create_net_single("ip_vs_stats", 0, ipvs->net->proc_net, - ip_vs_stats_show, NULL); - proc_create_net_single("ip_vs_stats_percpu", 0, ipvs->net->proc_net, - ip_vs_stats_percpu_show, NULL); +#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS + if (!proc_create_net("ip_vs", 0, ipvs->net->proc_net, + &ip_vs_info_seq_ops, sizeof(struct ip_vs_iter))) + goto err_vs; + if (!proc_create_net_single("ip_vs_stats", 0, ipvs->net->proc_net, + ip_vs_stats_show, NULL)) + goto err_stats; + if (!proc_create_net_single("ip_vs_stats_percpu", 0, + ipvs->net->proc_net, + ip_vs_stats_percpu_show, NULL)) + goto err_percpu; +#endif if (ip_vs_control_net_init_sysctl(ipvs)) goto err; @@ -4180,6 +4186,17 @@ int __net_init ip_vs_control_net_init(struct netns_ipvs *ipvs) return 0; err: +#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS + remove_proc_entry("ip_vs_stats_percpu", ipvs->net->proc_net); + +err_percpu: + remove_proc_entry("ip_vs_stats", ipvs->net->proc_net); + +err_stats: + remove_proc_entry("ip_vs", ipvs->net->proc_net); + +err_vs: +#endif free_percpu(ipvs->tot_stats.cpustats); return -ENOMEM; } @@ -4188,9 +4205,11 @@ void __net_exit ip_vs_control_net_cleanup(struct netns_ipvs *ipvs) { ip_vs_trash_cleanup(ipvs); ip_vs_control_net_cleanup_sysctl(ipvs); +#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS remove_proc_entry("ip_vs_stats_percpu", ipvs->net->proc_net); remove_proc_entry("ip_vs_stats", ipvs->net->proc_net); remove_proc_entry("ip_vs", ipvs->net->proc_net); +#endif free_percpu(ipvs->tot_stats.cpustats); }
kmemleak report a memory leak as follows: BUG: memory leak unreferenced object 0xffff8880759ea000 (size 256): backtrace: [<00000000c0bf2deb>] kmem_cache_zalloc include/linux/slab.h:656 [inline] [<00000000c0bf2deb>] __proc_create+0x23d/0x7d0 fs/proc/generic.c:421 [<000000009d718d02>] proc_create_reg+0x8e/0x140 fs/proc/generic.c:535 [<0000000097bbfc4f>] proc_create_net_data+0x8c/0x1b0 fs/proc/proc_net.c:126 [<00000000652480fc>] ip_vs_control_net_init+0x308/0x13a0 net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c:4169 [<000000004c927ebe>] __ip_vs_init+0x211/0x400 net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c:2429 [<00000000aa6b72d9>] ops_init+0xa8/0x3c0 net/core/net_namespace.c:151 [<00000000153fd114>] setup_net+0x2de/0x7e0 net/core/net_namespace.c:341 [<00000000be4e4f07>] copy_net_ns+0x27d/0x530 net/core/net_namespace.c:482 [<00000000f1c23ec9>] create_new_namespaces+0x382/0xa30 kernel/nsproxy.c:110 [<00000000098a5757>] copy_namespaces+0x2e6/0x3b0 kernel/nsproxy.c:179 [<0000000026ce39e9>] copy_process+0x220a/0x5f00 kernel/fork.c:2072 [<00000000b71f4efe>] _do_fork+0xc7/0xda0 kernel/fork.c:2428 [<000000002974ee96>] __do_sys_clone3+0x18a/0x280 kernel/fork.c:2703 [<0000000062ac0a4d>] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46 [<0000000093f1ce2c>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 In the error path of ip_vs_control_net_init(), remove_proc_entry() needs to be called to remove the added proc entry, otherwise a memory leak will occur. Also, add some '#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS' because proc_create_net* return NULL when PROC is not used. Fixes: b17fc9963f83 ("IPVS: netns, ip_vs_stats and its procfs") Fixes: 61b1ab4583e2 ("IPVS: netns, add basic init per netns.") Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Wang Hai <wanghai38@huawei.com> --- v2->v3: improve code format v1->v2: add some '#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS' and check the return value of proc_create_net* net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)