@@ -230,8 +230,6 @@ struct fastrpc_user {
int pd;
/* Lock for lists */
spinlock_t lock;
- /* lock for allocations */
- struct mutex mutex;
};
static void fastrpc_free_map(struct kref *ref)
@@ -267,16 +265,16 @@ static int fastrpc_map_find(struct fastrpc_user *fl, int fd,
{
struct fastrpc_map *map = NULL;
- mutex_lock(&fl->mutex);
+ spin_lock(&fl->lock);
list_for_each_entry(map, &fl->maps, node) {
if (map->fd == fd) {
fastrpc_map_get(map);
*ppmap = map;
- mutex_unlock(&fl->mutex);
+ spin_unlock(&fl->lock);
return 0;
}
}
- mutex_unlock(&fl->mutex);
+ spin_unlock(&fl->lock);
return -ENOENT;
}
@@ -1200,7 +1198,6 @@ static int fastrpc_device_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
fastrpc_session_free(cctx, fl->sctx);
fastrpc_channel_ctx_put(cctx);
- mutex_destroy(&fl->mutex);
kfree(fl);
file->private_data = NULL;
@@ -1222,7 +1219,6 @@ static int fastrpc_device_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
filp->private_data = fl;
spin_lock_init(&fl->lock);
- mutex_init(&fl->mutex);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fl->pending);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fl->maps);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fl->mmaps);
@@ -1233,7 +1229,6 @@ static int fastrpc_device_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
fl->sctx = fastrpc_session_alloc(cctx);
if (!fl->sctx) {
dev_err(&cctx->rpdev->dev, "No session available\n");
- mutex_destroy(&fl->mutex);
kfree(fl);
return -EBUSY;
Fix the broken behavior of having a separate mutex for locking at this place, and use the same spinlock that is used to add/remove from the list. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Marek <jonathan@marek.ca> --- drivers/misc/fastrpc.c | 11 +++-------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)