@@ -4008,6 +4008,26 @@ void lockdep_rcu_suspicious(const char *file, const int line, const char *s)
printk("%s:%d %s!\n", file, line, s);
printk("\nother info that might help us debug this:\n\n");
printk("\nrcu_scheduler_active = %d, debug_locks = %d\n", rcu_scheduler_active, debug_locks);
+
+ /*
+ * If a CPU is in dyntick-idle mode (CONFIG_NO_HZ), then RCU
+ * considers that CPU to be in an "extended quiescent state",
+ * which means that RCU will be completely ignoring that CPU.
+ * Therefore, rcu_read_lock() and friends have absolutely no
+ * effect on a dyntick-idle CPU. In other words, even if a
+ * dyntick-idle CPU has called rcu_read_lock(), RCU might well
+ * delete data structures out from under it. RCU really has no
+ * choice here: if it were to consult the CPU, that would wake
+ * the CPU up, and the whole point of dyntick-idle mode is to
+ * allow CPUs to enter extremely deep sleep states.
+ *
+ * So complain bitterly if someone does call rcu_read_lock(),
+ * rcu_read_lock_bh() and so on from extended quiescent states
+ * such as dyntick-idle mode.
+ */
+ if (rcu_check_extended_qs())
+ printk("RCU used illegally from extended quiescent state!\n");
+
lockdep_print_held_locks(curr);
printk("\nstack backtrace:\n");
dump_stack();