@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ struct bpf_test {
enum bpf_prog_type prog_type;
uint8_t flags;
void (*fill_helper)(struct bpf_test *self);
- uint8_t runs;
+ int runs;
#define bpf_testdata_struct_t \
struct { \
uint32_t retval, retval_unpriv; \
@@ -1165,7 +1165,7 @@ static void do_test_single(struct bpf_test *test, bool unpriv,
run_errs = 0;
run_successes = 0;
- if (!alignment_prevented_execution && fd_prog >= 0) {
+ if (!alignment_prevented_execution && fd_prog >= 0 && test->runs >= 0) {
uint32_t expected_val;
int i;
@@ -239,6 +239,7 @@
.result = ACCEPT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_LOOKUP,
.expected_attach_type = BPF_SK_LOOKUP,
+ .runs = -1,
},
/* invalid 8-byte reads from a 4-byte fields in bpf_sk_lookup */
{
sk_lookup doesn't allow setting data_in for bpf_prog_run. This doesn't play well with the verifier tests, since they always set a 64 byte input buffer. Allow not running verifier tests by setting bpf_test.runs to a negative value and don't run the ctx access case for sk_lookup. We have dedicated ctx access tests so skipping here doesn't reduce coverage. Signed-off-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 4 ++-- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_sk_lookup.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)