Message ID | 20210310052503.3618486-3-bhupesh.sharma@linaro.org |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | Enable Qualcomm Crypto Engine on sm8250 | expand |
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 10:54:57AM +0530, Bhupesh Sharma wrote: > Newer qcom chips support newer versions of the qce IP, so add > new compatible strings for qcom-qce (in addition to the existing > "qcom,crypto-v5.1"). > > With [1], Thara tried to add the support for new compatible strings, > but we couldn't conclude on the approach to be used. Since we have > a number of new qcom arm64 SoCs available now, several of which > support the same crypto IP version, so it makes more sense to use > the IP version for the compatible string, rather than using the soc > name as the compatible string. > > [1]. https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20201119155233.3974286-7-thara.gopinath@linaro.org/ > > Cc: Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@linaro.org> > Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> > Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> > Cc: Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org> > Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> > Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> > Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> > Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com> > Cc: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org > Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org > Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Cc: bhupesh.linux@gmail.com > Signed-off-by: Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@linaro.org> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/qcom-qce.txt | 6 +++++- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/qcom-qce.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/qcom-qce.txt > index 07ee1b12000b..217b37dbd58a 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/qcom-qce.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/qcom-qce.txt > @@ -2,7 +2,11 @@ Qualcomm crypto engine driver > > Required properties: > > -- compatible : should be "qcom,crypto-v5.1" > +- compatible : Supported versions are: > + - "qcom,crypto-v5.1", for ipq6018 > + - "qcom,crypto-v5.4", for sdm845, sm8150 2 SoCs sharing 1 version doesn't convince me on using version numbers. Having 4 versions for 5 SoCs further convinces me you should stick with SoC specific compatibles as *everyone* else does (including most QCom bindings). > + - "qcom,crypto-v5.5", for sm8250 > + - "qcom,crypto-v5.6", for sm8350 > - reg : specifies base physical address and size of the registers map > - clocks : phandle to clock-controller plus clock-specifier pair > - clock-names : "iface" clocks register interface > -- > 2.29.2 >
Hi Rob, Thanks for your review. On Wed, 17 Mar 2021 at 03:58, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 10:54:57AM +0530, Bhupesh Sharma wrote: > > Newer qcom chips support newer versions of the qce IP, so add > > new compatible strings for qcom-qce (in addition to the existing > > "qcom,crypto-v5.1"). > > > > With [1], Thara tried to add the support for new compatible strings, > > but we couldn't conclude on the approach to be used. Since we have > > a number of new qcom arm64 SoCs available now, several of which > > support the same crypto IP version, so it makes more sense to use > > the IP version for the compatible string, rather than using the soc > > name as the compatible string. > > > > [1]. https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20201119155233.3974286-7-thara.gopinath@linaro.org/ > > > > Cc: Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@linaro.org> > > Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> > > Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> > > Cc: Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org> > > Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> > > Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> > > Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> > > Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com> > > Cc: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org > > Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org > > Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org > > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > Cc: bhupesh.linux@gmail.com > > Signed-off-by: Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@linaro.org> > > --- > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/qcom-qce.txt | 6 +++++- > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/qcom-qce.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/qcom-qce.txt > > index 07ee1b12000b..217b37dbd58a 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/qcom-qce.txt > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/qcom-qce.txt > > @@ -2,7 +2,11 @@ Qualcomm crypto engine driver > > > > Required properties: > > > > -- compatible : should be "qcom,crypto-v5.1" > > +- compatible : Supported versions are: > > + - "qcom,crypto-v5.1", for ipq6018 > > + - "qcom,crypto-v5.4", for sdm845, sm8150 > > 2 SoCs sharing 1 version doesn't convince me on using version numbers. > Having 4 versions for 5 SoCs further convinces me you should stick with > SoC specific compatibles as *everyone* else does (including most QCom > bindings). Fair enough. I will add SoC specific compatibles in v2, which should be out shortly. Regards, Bhupesh > > + - "qcom,crypto-v5.5", for sm8250 > > + - "qcom,crypto-v5.6", for sm8350 > > - reg : specifies base physical address and size of the registers map > > - clocks : phandle to clock-controller plus clock-specifier pair > > - clock-names : "iface" clocks register interface > > -- > > 2.29.2 > >
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/qcom-qce.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/qcom-qce.txt index 07ee1b12000b..217b37dbd58a 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/qcom-qce.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/qcom-qce.txt @@ -2,7 +2,11 @@ Qualcomm crypto engine driver Required properties: -- compatible : should be "qcom,crypto-v5.1" +- compatible : Supported versions are: + - "qcom,crypto-v5.1", for ipq6018 + - "qcom,crypto-v5.4", for sdm845, sm8150 + - "qcom,crypto-v5.5", for sm8250 + - "qcom,crypto-v5.6", for sm8350 - reg : specifies base physical address and size of the registers map - clocks : phandle to clock-controller plus clock-specifier pair - clock-names : "iface" clocks register interface
Newer qcom chips support newer versions of the qce IP, so add new compatible strings for qcom-qce (in addition to the existing "qcom,crypto-v5.1"). With [1], Thara tried to add the support for new compatible strings, but we couldn't conclude on the approach to be used. Since we have a number of new qcom arm64 SoCs available now, several of which support the same crypto IP version, so it makes more sense to use the IP version for the compatible string, rather than using the soc name as the compatible string. [1]. https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20201119155233.3974286-7-thara.gopinath@linaro.org/ Cc: Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@linaro.org> Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> Cc: Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org> Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com> Cc: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: bhupesh.linux@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@linaro.org> --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/qcom-qce.txt | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) -- 2.29.2