| Message ID | 1615495264-6816-1-git-send-email-loic.poulain@linaro.org |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [net-next,v5,1/2] net: Add a WWAN subsystem | expand |
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 09:41:03PM +0100, Loic Poulain wrote: > This change introduces initial support for a WWAN subsystem. Given the > complexity and heterogeneity of existing WWAN hardwares and interfaces, > there is no strict definition of what a WWAN device is and how it should > be represented. It's often a collection of multiple components/devices > that perform the global WWAN feature (netdev, tty, chardev, etc). > > One usual way to expose modem controls and configuration is via high > level protocols such as the well known AT command protocol, MBIM or > QMI. The USB modems started to expose that as character devices, and > user daemons such as ModemManager learnt how to deal with that. This > initial version adds the concept of WWAN port, which can be registered > by any driver to expose one of these protocols. The WWAN core takes > care of the generic part, including character device creation and lets > the driver implementing access (fops) to the selected protocol. > > Since the different components/devices do no necesserarly know about > each others, and can be created/removed in different orders, the > WWAN core ensures that devices being part of the same hardware are > also represented as a unique WWAN device, relying on the provided > parent device (e.g. mhi controller, USB device). It's a 'trick' I > copied from Johannes's earlier WWAN subsystem proposal. > > This initial version is purposely minimalist, it's essentially moving > the generic part of the previously proposed mhi_wwan_ctrl driver inside > a common WWAN framework, but the implementation is open and flexible > enough to allow extension for further drivers. > > Signed-off-by: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@linaro.org> > --- > v2: not part of the series > v3: not part of the series > v4: Introduce WWAN framework/subsystem > v5: Specify WWAN_CORE module name in Kconfig > > drivers/net/Kconfig | 2 + > drivers/net/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/net/wwan/Kconfig | 22 +++++++ > drivers/net/wwan/Makefile | 8 +++ > drivers/net/wwan/wwan_core.c | 150 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > drivers/net/wwan/wwan_core.h | 20 ++++++ > drivers/net/wwan/wwan_port.c | 136 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > include/linux/wwan.h | 121 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 8 files changed, 460 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 drivers/net/wwan/Kconfig > create mode 100644 drivers/net/wwan/Makefile > create mode 100644 drivers/net/wwan/wwan_core.c > create mode 100644 drivers/net/wwan/wwan_core.h > create mode 100644 drivers/net/wwan/wwan_port.c > create mode 100644 include/linux/wwan.h > > diff --git a/drivers/net/Kconfig b/drivers/net/Kconfig > index 260f9f4..ec00f92 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/net/Kconfig > @@ -500,6 +500,8 @@ source "drivers/net/wan/Kconfig" > > source "drivers/net/ieee802154/Kconfig" > > +source "drivers/net/wwan/Kconfig" > + > config XEN_NETDEV_FRONTEND > tristate "Xen network device frontend driver" > depends on XEN > diff --git a/drivers/net/Makefile b/drivers/net/Makefile > index f4990ff..5da6424 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/Makefile > +++ b/drivers/net/Makefile > @@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SUNGEM_PHY) += sungem_phy.o > obj-$(CONFIG_WAN) += wan/ > obj-$(CONFIG_WLAN) += wireless/ > obj-$(CONFIG_IEEE802154) += ieee802154/ > +obj-$(CONFIG_WWAN) += wwan/ > > obj-$(CONFIG_VMXNET3) += vmxnet3/ > obj-$(CONFIG_XEN_NETDEV_FRONTEND) += xen-netfront.o > diff --git a/drivers/net/wwan/Kconfig b/drivers/net/wwan/Kconfig > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..545fe54 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/drivers/net/wwan/Kconfig > @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@ > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only > +# > +# Wireless WAN device configuration > +# > + > +menuconfig WWAN > + bool "Wireless WAN" > + help > + This section contains Wireless WAN driver configurations. > + > +if WWAN > + > +config WWAN_CORE > + tristate "WWAN Driver Core" > + help > + Say Y here if you want to use the WWAN driver core. This driver > + provides a common framework for WWAN drivers. > + > + To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module will be > + called wwan. > + > +endif # WWAN > diff --git a/drivers/net/wwan/Makefile b/drivers/net/wwan/Makefile > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..ca8bb5a > --- /dev/null > +++ b/drivers/net/wwan/Makefile > @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > +# > +# Makefile for the Linux WWAN device drivers. > +# > + > +obj-$(CONFIG_WWAN_CORE) += wwan.o > +wwan-objs += wwan_core.o wwan_port.o > + > diff --git a/drivers/net/wwan/wwan_core.c b/drivers/net/wwan/wwan_core.c > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..42ba6c0 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/drivers/net/wwan/wwan_core.c > @@ -0,0 +1,150 @@ > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only > +/* Copyright (c) 2021, Linaro Ltd <loic.poulain@linaro.org> */ > + > +#include <linux/err.h> > +#include <linux/errno.h> > +#include <linux/init.h> > +#include <linux/fs.h> > +#include <linux/idr.h> > +#include <linux/kernel.h> > +#include <linux/module.h> > +#include <linux/slab.h> > +#include <linux/types.h> > +#include <linux/wwan.h> > + > +#include "wwan_core.h" > + > +static LIST_HEAD(wwan_list); /* list of registered wwan devices */ Why do you need a list as you already have a list of them all in the class structure? > +static DEFINE_IDA(wwan_ida); > +static DEFINE_MUTEX(wwan_global_lock); What is this lock for? I don't think you need a lock for a ida/idr structure if you use it in the "simple" mode, right? > +struct class *wwan_class; Why is this a global structure? > + > +static struct wwan_device *__wwan_find_by_parent(struct device *parent) > +{ > + struct wwan_device *wwandev; > + > + if (!parent) > + return NULL; > + > + list_for_each_entry(wwandev, &wwan_list, list) { > + if (wwandev->dev.parent == parent) > + return wwandev; Nice, no locking! :( Again, why not use the driver core bits for this? Also, no reference counting is used here, sure way to cause problems :( > + } > + > + return NULL; > +} > + > +static void wwan_dev_release(struct device *dev) > +{ > + struct wwan_device *wwandev = to_wwan_dev(dev); > + > + kfree(wwandev); > +} > + > +static const struct device_type wwan_type = { > + .name = "wwan", > + .release = wwan_dev_release, > +}; > + > +struct wwan_device *wwan_create_dev(struct device *parent) > +{ > + struct wwan_device *wwandev; > + int err, id; > + > + mutex_lock(&wwan_global_lock); > + > + wwandev = __wwan_find_by_parent(parent); > + if (wwandev) { > + get_device(&wwandev->dev); Ah, you lock outside of the function, and increment the reference count, that's a sure way to cause auditing problems over time. Don't do that, you know better. > + wwandev->usage++; Hah, why? You now have 2 reference counts for the same structure? > + goto done_unlock; > + } > + > + id = ida_alloc(&wwan_ida, GFP_KERNEL); Again, I do not think you need a lock if you use this structure in a safe way. > + if (id < 0) > + goto done_unlock; > + > + wwandev = kzalloc(sizeof(*wwandev), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!wwandev) { > + ida_free(&wwan_ida, id); > + goto done_unlock; > + } > + > + wwandev->dev.parent = parent; > + wwandev->dev.class = wwan_class; > + wwandev->dev.type = &wwan_type; > + wwandev->id = id; > + dev_set_name(&wwandev->dev, "wwan%d", wwandev->id); > + wwandev->usage = 1; > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&wwandev->ports); > + > + err = device_register(&wwandev->dev); > + if (err) { > + put_device(&wwandev->dev); > + ida_free(&wwan_ida, id); > + wwandev = NULL; > + goto done_unlock; > + } > + > + list_add_tail(&wwandev->list, &wwan_list); > + > +done_unlock: > + mutex_unlock(&wwan_global_lock); > + > + return wwandev; > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(wwan_create_dev); > + > +void wwan_destroy_dev(struct wwan_device *wwandev) > +{ > + mutex_lock(&wwan_global_lock); > + wwandev->usage--; Nice, 2 references! :( > + > + if (wwandev->usage) > + goto done_unlock; No, you don't need this. > + > + /* Someone destroyed the wwan device without removing ports */ > + WARN_ON(!list_empty(&wwandev->ports)); why? Did you just reboot a system? > + > + list_del(&wwandev->list); > + device_unregister(&wwandev->dev); > + ida_free(&wwan_ida, wwandev->id); > + put_device(&wwandev->dev); > + > +done_unlock: > + mutex_unlock(&wwan_global_lock); > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(wwan_destroy_dev); > + > +static int __init wwan_init(void) > +{ > + int err; > + > + wwan_class = class_create(THIS_MODULE, "wwan"); > + if (IS_ERR(wwan_class)) > + return PTR_ERR(wwan_class); > + > + err = wwan_port_init(); > + if (err) > + goto err_class_destroy; > + > + return 0; > + > +err_class_destroy: > + class_destroy(wwan_class); > + return err; > +} > + > +static void __exit wwan_exit(void) > +{ > + wwan_port_deinit(); > + class_destroy(wwan_class); > +} > + > +//subsys_initcall(wwan_init); ??? Debugging code left around? > +module_init(wwan_init); > +module_exit(wwan_exit); > + > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@linaro.org>"); > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("WWAN core"); > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2"); > diff --git a/drivers/net/wwan/wwan_core.h b/drivers/net/wwan/wwan_core.h > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..21d187a > --- /dev/null > +++ b/drivers/net/wwan/wwan_core.h > @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@ > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */ > +/* Copyright (c) 2021, Linaro Ltd <loic.poulain@linaro.org> */ > + > +#ifndef __WWAN_CORE_H > +#define __WWAN_CORE_H > + > +#include <linux/device.h> > +#include <linux/wwan.h> > + > +#define to_wwan_dev(d) container_of(d, struct wwan_device, dev) > + > +struct wwan_device *wwan_create_dev(struct device *parent); > +void wwan_destroy_dev(struct wwan_device *wwandev); > + > +int wwan_port_init(void); > +void wwan_port_deinit(void); > + > +extern struct class *wwan_class; > + > +#endif /* WWAN_CORE_H */ > diff --git a/drivers/net/wwan/wwan_port.c b/drivers/net/wwan/wwan_port.c > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..b32da8f > --- /dev/null > +++ b/drivers/net/wwan/wwan_port.c > @@ -0,0 +1,136 @@ > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only > +/* Copyright (c) 2021, Linaro Ltd <loic.poulain@linaro.org> */ > + > +#include <linux/err.h> > +#include <linux/errno.h> > +#include <linux/fs.h> > +#include <linux/idr.h> > +#include <linux/kernel.h> > +#include <linux/module.h> > +#include <linux/wwan.h> > + > +#include "wwan_core.h" > + > +#define WWAN_MAX_MINORS 32 Why only 32? > + > +static int wwan_major; > +static DEFINE_IDR(wwan_port_idr); > +static DEFINE_MUTEX(wwan_port_idr_lock); More idrs? > + > +static const char * const wwan_port_type_str[] = { > + "AT", > + "MBIM", > + "QMI", > + "QCDM", > + "FIREHOSE" > +}; > + > +int wwan_add_port(struct wwan_port *port) > +{ > + struct wwan_device *wwandev = port->wwandev; > + struct device *dev; > + int minor, err; > + > + if (port->type >= WWAN_PORT_MAX || !port->fops || !wwandev) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + mutex_lock(&wwan_port_idr_lock); > + minor = idr_alloc(&wwan_port_idr, port, 0, WWAN_MAX_MINORS, GFP_KERNEL); > + mutex_unlock(&wwan_port_idr_lock); Again, I do not think you need a lock. I could be wrong though, you might want to look into it... > + > + if (minor < 0) > + return minor; > + > + mutex_lock(&wwandev->lock); > + > + dev = device_create(wwan_class, &wwandev->dev, > + MKDEV(wwan_major, minor), port, > + "wwan%dp%u%s", wwandev->id, wwandev->port_idx, > + wwan_port_type_str[port->type]); > + if (IS_ERR(dev)) { > + err = PTR_ERR(dev); > + mutex_unlock(&wwandev->lock); > + goto error_free_idr; > + } > + > + port->id = wwandev->port_idx++; You increment the id after creating it? > + port->minor = minor; > + > + list_add(&port->list, &wwandev->ports); > + > + mutex_unlock(&port->wwandev->lock); > + > + return 0; > + > +error_free_idr: > + mutex_lock(&wwan_port_idr_lock); > + idr_remove(&wwan_port_idr, minor); > + mutex_unlock(&wwan_port_idr_lock); > + > + return err; > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(wwan_add_port); > + > +void wwan_remove_port(struct wwan_port *port) > +{ > + struct wwan_device *wwandev = port->wwandev; > + > + WARN_ON(!wwandev); WARN_ON is a huge crutch, never use it in new code. > + > + mutex_lock(&wwandev->lock); > + device_destroy(wwan_class, MKDEV(wwan_major, port->minor)); > + list_del(&port->list); > + mutex_unlock(&wwandev->lock); > + > + mutex_lock(&wwan_port_idr_lock); > + idr_remove(&wwan_port_idr, port->minor); > + mutex_unlock(&wwan_port_idr_lock); > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(wwan_remove_port); > + > +static int wwan_port_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file) > +{ > + const struct file_operations *new_fops; > + unsigned int minor = iminor(inode); > + struct wwan_port *port; > + int err = 0; > + > + mutex_lock(&wwan_port_idr_lock); > + port = idr_find(&wwan_port_idr, minor); > + if (!port) { > + mutex_unlock(&wwan_port_idr_lock); > + return -ENODEV; > + } > + mutex_unlock(&wwan_port_idr_lock); > + > + file->private_data = port->private_data ? port->private_data : port; > + stream_open(inode, file); > + > + new_fops = fops_get(port->fops); > + replace_fops(file, new_fops); Why replace the fops? > + if (file->f_op->open) > + err = file->f_op->open(inode, file); > + > + return err; > +} > + > +static const struct file_operations wwan_port_fops = { > + .owner = THIS_MODULE, > + .open = wwan_port_open, > + .llseek = noop_llseek, > +}; > + > +int wwan_port_init(void) > +{ > + wwan_major = register_chrdev(0, "wwanport", &wwan_port_fops); > + if (wwan_major < 0) > + return wwan_major; > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +void wwan_port_deinit(void) > +{ > + unregister_chrdev(wwan_major, "wwanport"); > + idr_destroy(&wwan_port_idr); > +} I'm confused, you have 1 class, but 2 different major numbers for this class? You have a device and ports with different numbers, how are they all tied together? > diff --git a/include/linux/wwan.h b/include/linux/wwan.h > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..6caca5c > --- /dev/null > +++ b/include/linux/wwan.h > @@ -0,0 +1,121 @@ > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */ > +/* Copyright (c) 2021, Linaro Ltd <loic.poulain@linaro.org> */ > + > +#ifndef __WWAN_H > +#define __WWAN_H > + > +#include <linux/device.h> > +#include <linux/kernel.h> > + > +/** > + * struct wwan_device - The structure that defines a WWAN device > + * > + * @id: WWAN device unique ID. > + * @usage: WWAN device usage counter. > + * @dev: underlying device. > + * @list: list to chain WWAN devices. > + * @ports: list of attached wwan_port. > + * @port_idx: port index counter. > + * @lock: mutex protecting members of this structure. > + */ > +struct wwan_device { > + int id; > + unsigned int usage; Again, not needed. > + > + struct device dev; > + struct list_head list; You should use the list in the class instead. > + > + struct list_head ports; Are you sure you need this? > + unsigned int port_idx; > + > + struct mutex lock; > +}; > + > +/** > + * enum wwan_port_type - WWAN port types > + * @WWAN_PORT_AT: AT commands. > + * @WWAN_PORT_MBIM: Mobile Broadband Interface Model control. > + * @WWAN_PORT_QMI: Qcom modem/MSM interface for modem control. > + * @WWAN_PORT_QCDM: Qcom Modem diagnostic interface. > + * @WWAN_PORT_FIREHOSE: XML based command protocol. > + * @WWAN_PORT_MAX > + */ > +enum wwan_port_type { > + WWAN_PORT_AT, > + WWAN_PORT_MBIM, > + WWAN_PORT_QMI, > + WWAN_PORT_QCDM, > + WWAN_PORT_FIREHOSE, > + WWAN_PORT_MAX, > +}; > + > +/** > + * struct wwan_port - The structure that defines a WWAN port > + * > + * @wwandev: WWAN device this port belongs to. > + * @fops: Port file operations. > + * @private_data: underlying device. > + * @type: port type. > + * @id: port allocated ID. > + * @minor: port allocated minor ID for cdev. > + * @list: list to chain WWAN ports. > + */ > +struct wwan_port { > + struct wwan_device *wwandev; > + const struct file_operations *fops; > + void *private_data; > + enum wwan_port_type type; > + > + /* private */ > + unsigned int id; > + int minor; > + struct list_head list; So a port is not a device? Why not? For such a tiny amount of code, I had a lot of questions :( greg k-h
Hi Greg, On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 at 07:56, Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 09:41:03PM +0100, Loic Poulain wrote: > > This change introduces initial support for a WWAN subsystem. Given the > > complexity and heterogeneity of existing WWAN hardwares and interfaces, > > there is no strict definition of what a WWAN device is and how it should > > be represented. It's often a collection of multiple components/devices > > that perform the global WWAN feature (netdev, tty, chardev, etc). > > > > One usual way to expose modem controls and configuration is via high > > level protocols such as the well known AT command protocol, MBIM or > > QMI. The USB modems started to expose that as character devices, and > > user daemons such as ModemManager learnt how to deal with that. This > > initial version adds the concept of WWAN port, which can be registered > > by any driver to expose one of these protocols. The WWAN core takes > > care of the generic part, including character device creation and lets > > the driver implementing access (fops) to the selected protocol. > > > > Since the different components/devices do no necesserarly know about > > each others, and can be created/removed in different orders, the > > WWAN core ensures that devices being part of the same hardware are > > also represented as a unique WWAN device, relying on the provided > > parent device (e.g. mhi controller, USB device). It's a 'trick' I > > copied from Johannes's earlier WWAN subsystem proposal. > > > > This initial version is purposely minimalist, it's essentially moving > > the generic part of the previously proposed mhi_wwan_ctrl driver inside > > a common WWAN framework, but the implementation is open and flexible > > enough to allow extension for further drivers. > > > > Signed-off-by: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@linaro.org> [...] > > +#include <linux/err.h> > > +#include <linux/errno.h> > > +#include <linux/init.h> > > +#include <linux/fs.h> > > +#include <linux/idr.h> > > +#include <linux/kernel.h> > > +#include <linux/module.h> > > +#include <linux/slab.h> > > +#include <linux/types.h> > > +#include <linux/wwan.h> > > + > > +#include "wwan_core.h" > > + > > +static LIST_HEAD(wwan_list); /* list of registered wwan devices */ > > Why do you need a list as you already have a list of them all in the > class structure? Thanks, indeed, I can use class helpers for that. > > > +static DEFINE_IDA(wwan_ida); > > +static DEFINE_MUTEX(wwan_global_lock); > > What is this lock for? I don't think you need a lock for a ida/idr > structure if you use it in the "simple" mode, right? > > > +struct class *wwan_class; > > Why is this a global structure? It's also used inside wwan_port.c, but we can also retrieve the class directly from wwandev->dev.class, so yes it's not strictly necessary to have it global. > > > + > > +static struct wwan_device *__wwan_find_by_parent(struct device *parent) > > +{ > > + struct wwan_device *wwandev; > > + > > + if (!parent) > > + return NULL; > > + > > + list_for_each_entry(wwandev, &wwan_list, list) { > > + if (wwandev->dev.parent == parent) > > + return wwandev; > > Nice, no locking! > > :( > > Again, why not use the driver core bits for this? > > Also, no reference counting is used here, sure way to cause problems :( > > > + } > > + > > + return NULL; > > +} > > + > > +static void wwan_dev_release(struct device *dev) > > +{ > > + struct wwan_device *wwandev = to_wwan_dev(dev); > > + > > + kfree(wwandev); > > +} > > + > > +static const struct device_type wwan_type = { > > + .name = "wwan", > > + .release = wwan_dev_release, > > +}; > > + > > +struct wwan_device *wwan_create_dev(struct device *parent) > > +{ > > + struct wwan_device *wwandev; > > + int err, id; > > + > > + mutex_lock(&wwan_global_lock); > > + > > + wwandev = __wwan_find_by_parent(parent); > > + if (wwandev) { > > + get_device(&wwandev->dev); > > Ah, you lock outside of the function, and increment the reference count, > that's a sure way to cause auditing problems over time. Don't do that, > you know better. Ok, that makes sense. > > > + wwandev->usage++; > > Hah, why? You now have 2 reference counts for the same structure? 'usage' is probably not the right term, but this counter tracks device registration life to determine when the device must be unregistered from the system (several wwan drivers can be exposed as a unique wwan device), while device kref tracks the wwan device life. They are kind of coupled, but a device can not be released if not priorly unregistered. > > > + goto done_unlock; > > + } > > + > > + id = ida_alloc(&wwan_ida, GFP_KERNEL); > > Again, I do not think you need a lock if you use this structure in a > safe way. > > > + if (id < 0) > > + goto done_unlock; > > + > > + wwandev = kzalloc(sizeof(*wwandev), GFP_KERNEL); > > + if (!wwandev) { > > + ida_free(&wwan_ida, id); > > + goto done_unlock; > > + } > > + > > + wwandev->dev.parent = parent; > > + wwandev->dev.class = wwan_class; > > + wwandev->dev.type = &wwan_type; > > + wwandev->id = id; > > + dev_set_name(&wwandev->dev, "wwan%d", wwandev->id); > > + wwandev->usage = 1; > > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&wwandev->ports); > > + > > + err = device_register(&wwandev->dev); > > + if (err) { > > + put_device(&wwandev->dev); > > + ida_free(&wwan_ida, id); > > + wwandev = NULL; > > + goto done_unlock; > > + } > > + > > + list_add_tail(&wwandev->list, &wwan_list); > > + > > +done_unlock: > > + mutex_unlock(&wwan_global_lock); > > + > > + return wwandev; > > +} > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(wwan_create_dev); > > + > > +void wwan_destroy_dev(struct wwan_device *wwandev) > > +{ > > + mutex_lock(&wwan_global_lock); > > + wwandev->usage--; > > Nice, 2 references! :( > > > + > > + if (wwandev->usage) > > + goto done_unlock; > > No, you don't need this. > > > + > > + /* Someone destroyed the wwan device without removing ports */ > > + WARN_ON(!list_empty(&wwandev->ports)); > > why? > > Did you just reboot a system? > > > + > > + list_del(&wwandev->list); > > + device_unregister(&wwandev->dev); > > + ida_free(&wwan_ida, wwandev->id); > > + put_device(&wwandev->dev); > > + > > +done_unlock: > > + mutex_unlock(&wwan_global_lock); > > +} > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(wwan_destroy_dev); > > + > > +static int __init wwan_init(void) > > +{ > > + int err; > > + > > + wwan_class = class_create(THIS_MODULE, "wwan"); > > + if (IS_ERR(wwan_class)) > > + return PTR_ERR(wwan_class); > > + > > + err = wwan_port_init(); > > + if (err) > > + goto err_class_destroy; > > + > > + return 0; > > + > > +err_class_destroy: > > + class_destroy(wwan_class); > > + return err; > > +} > > + > > +static void __exit wwan_exit(void) > > +{ > > + wwan_port_deinit(); > > + class_destroy(wwan_class); > > +} > > + > > +//subsys_initcall(wwan_init); > > ??? > > Debugging code left around? > > > +module_init(wwan_init); > > +module_exit(wwan_exit); > > + > > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@linaro.org>"); > > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("WWAN core"); > > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2"); > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wwan/wwan_core.h b/drivers/net/wwan/wwan_core.h > > new file mode 100644 > > index 0000000..21d187a > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/drivers/net/wwan/wwan_core.h > > @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@ > > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */ > > +/* Copyright (c) 2021, Linaro Ltd <loic.poulain@linaro.org> */ > > + > > +#ifndef __WWAN_CORE_H > > +#define __WWAN_CORE_H > > + > > +#include <linux/device.h> > > +#include <linux/wwan.h> > > + > > +#define to_wwan_dev(d) container_of(d, struct wwan_device, dev) > > + > > +struct wwan_device *wwan_create_dev(struct device *parent); > > +void wwan_destroy_dev(struct wwan_device *wwandev); > > + > > +int wwan_port_init(void); > > +void wwan_port_deinit(void); > > + > > +extern struct class *wwan_class; > > + > > +#endif /* WWAN_CORE_H */ > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wwan/wwan_port.c b/drivers/net/wwan/wwan_port.c > > new file mode 100644 > > index 0000000..b32da8f > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/drivers/net/wwan/wwan_port.c > > @@ -0,0 +1,136 @@ > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only > > +/* Copyright (c) 2021, Linaro Ltd <loic.poulain@linaro.org> */ > > + > > +#include <linux/err.h> > > +#include <linux/errno.h> > > +#include <linux/fs.h> > > +#include <linux/idr.h> > > +#include <linux/kernel.h> > > +#include <linux/module.h> > > +#include <linux/wwan.h> > > + > > +#include "wwan_core.h" > > + > > +#define WWAN_MAX_MINORS 32 > > Why only 32? It's an arbitrary value, 32 wwan ports seem enough. > > > + > > +static int wwan_major; > > +static DEFINE_IDR(wwan_port_idr); > > +static DEFINE_MUTEX(wwan_port_idr_lock); > > More idrs? These idrs are used for getting wwan_port minors (more below). > > + > > +static const char * const wwan_port_type_str[] = { > > + "AT", > > + "MBIM", > > + "QMI", > > + "QCDM", > > + "FIREHOSE" > > +}; [...] > > +static int wwan_port_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file) > > +{ > > + const struct file_operations *new_fops; > > + unsigned int minor = iminor(inode); > > + struct wwan_port *port; > > + int err = 0; > > + > > + mutex_lock(&wwan_port_idr_lock); > > + port = idr_find(&wwan_port_idr, minor); > > + if (!port) { > > + mutex_unlock(&wwan_port_idr_lock); > > + return -ENODEV; > > + } > > + mutex_unlock(&wwan_port_idr_lock); > > + > > + file->private_data = port->private_data ? port->private_data : port; > > + stream_open(inode, file); > > + > > + new_fops = fops_get(port->fops); > > + replace_fops(file, new_fops); > > Why replace the fops? WWAN port behaves a bit like the misc framework here, allowing a wwan driver to register its own file ops. When the user opens a wwan cdev port, we simply switch from generic wwan no-op to the specific driver's registered fops. The sound subsystem also does that (snd_open). Another way would be to define generic wwan file operations in the core, and forward them to a set of wwan port ops (e.g. wwan_port->ops.read), but I don't think it brings too much benefit for now. > > > + if (file->f_op->open) > > + err = file->f_op->open(inode, file); > > + > > + return err; > > +} > > + > > +static const struct file_operations wwan_port_fops = { > > + .owner = THIS_MODULE, > > + .open = wwan_port_open, > > + .llseek = noop_llseek, > > +}; > > + > > +int wwan_port_init(void) > > +{ > > + wwan_major = register_chrdev(0, "wwanport", &wwan_port_fops); > > + if (wwan_major < 0) > > + return wwan_major; > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > +void wwan_port_deinit(void) > > +{ > > + unregister_chrdev(wwan_major, "wwanport"); > > + idr_destroy(&wwan_port_idr); > > +} > > > I'm confused, you have 1 class, but 2 different major numbers for this > class? You have a device and ports with different numbers, how are they > all tied together? There is one wwan class with different device types (wwan devices and wwan control ports), a port is a child of a wwan device. Only wwan ports are exposed as character devices and IDR is used for getting a minor. wwan device IDA is just used to alloc unique wwan device ID. > > diff --git a/include/linux/wwan.h b/include/linux/wwan.h > > new file mode 100644 > > index 0000000..6caca5c > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/include/linux/wwan.h > > @@ -0,0 +1,121 @@ > > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */ > > +/* Copyright (c) 2021, Linaro Ltd <loic.poulain@linaro.org> */ > > + > > +#ifndef __WWAN_H > > +#define __WWAN_H > > + > > +#include <linux/device.h> > > +#include <linux/kernel.h> > > + > > +/** > > + * struct wwan_device - The structure that defines a WWAN device > > + * > > + * @id: WWAN device unique ID. > > + * @usage: WWAN device usage counter. > > + * @dev: underlying device. > > + * @list: list to chain WWAN devices. > > + * @ports: list of attached wwan_port. > > + * @port_idx: port index counter. > > + * @lock: mutex protecting members of this structure. > > + */ > > +struct wwan_device { > > + int id; > > + unsigned int usage; > > Again, not needed. > > > + > > + struct device dev; > > + struct list_head list; > > You should use the list in the class instead. Will do. > > > + > > + struct list_head ports; > > Are you sure you need this? No, indeed, I can just rely on the wwan device child list. > > > + unsigned int port_idx; > > + > > + struct mutex lock; > > +}; > > + > > +/** > > + * enum wwan_port_type - WWAN port types > > + * @WWAN_PORT_AT: AT commands. > > + * @WWAN_PORT_MBIM: Mobile Broadband Interface Model control. > > + * @WWAN_PORT_QMI: Qcom modem/MSM interface for modem control. > > + * @WWAN_PORT_QCDM: Qcom Modem diagnostic interface. > > + * @WWAN_PORT_FIREHOSE: XML based command protocol. > > + * @WWAN_PORT_MAX > > + */ > > +enum wwan_port_type { > > + WWAN_PORT_AT, > > + WWAN_PORT_MBIM, > > + WWAN_PORT_QMI, > > + WWAN_PORT_QCDM, > > + WWAN_PORT_FIREHOSE, > > + WWAN_PORT_MAX, > > +}; > > + > > +/** > > + * struct wwan_port - The structure that defines a WWAN port > > + * > > + * @wwandev: WWAN device this port belongs to. > > + * @fops: Port file operations. > > + * @private_data: underlying device. > > + * @type: port type. > > + * @id: port allocated ID. > > + * @minor: port allocated minor ID for cdev. > > + * @list: list to chain WWAN ports. > > + */ > > +struct wwan_port { > > + struct wwan_device *wwandev; > > + const struct file_operations *fops; > > + void *private_data; > > + enum wwan_port_type type; > > + > > + /* private */ > > + unsigned int id; > > + int minor; > > + struct list_head list; > > So a port is not a device? Why not? A port is represented as a device, device_create is called when port is attached to wwan core, but it indeed would make more sense to simply make wwan_port a device. Thanks, Loic
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 12:11:50PM +0100, Loic Poulain wrote: > Hi Greg, > > On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 at 07:56, Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 09:41:03PM +0100, Loic Poulain wrote: > > > This change introduces initial support for a WWAN subsystem. Given the > > > complexity and heterogeneity of existing WWAN hardwares and interfaces, > > > there is no strict definition of what a WWAN device is and how it should > > > be represented. It's often a collection of multiple components/devices > > > that perform the global WWAN feature (netdev, tty, chardev, etc). > > > > > > One usual way to expose modem controls and configuration is via high > > > level protocols such as the well known AT command protocol, MBIM or > > > QMI. The USB modems started to expose that as character devices, and > > > user daemons such as ModemManager learnt how to deal with that. This > > > initial version adds the concept of WWAN port, which can be registered > > > by any driver to expose one of these protocols. The WWAN core takes > > > care of the generic part, including character device creation and lets > > > the driver implementing access (fops) to the selected protocol. > > > > > > Since the different components/devices do no necesserarly know about > > > each others, and can be created/removed in different orders, the > > > WWAN core ensures that devices being part of the same hardware are > > > also represented as a unique WWAN device, relying on the provided > > > parent device (e.g. mhi controller, USB device). It's a 'trick' I > > > copied from Johannes's earlier WWAN subsystem proposal. > > > > > > This initial version is purposely minimalist, it's essentially moving > > > the generic part of the previously proposed mhi_wwan_ctrl driver inside > > > a common WWAN framework, but the implementation is open and flexible > > > enough to allow extension for further drivers. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@linaro.org> > [...] > > > +#include <linux/err.h> > > > +#include <linux/errno.h> > > > +#include <linux/init.h> > > > +#include <linux/fs.h> > > > +#include <linux/idr.h> > > > +#include <linux/kernel.h> > > > +#include <linux/module.h> > > > +#include <linux/slab.h> > > > +#include <linux/types.h> > > > +#include <linux/wwan.h> > > > + > > > +#include "wwan_core.h" > > > + > > > +static LIST_HEAD(wwan_list); /* list of registered wwan devices */ > > > > Why do you need a list as you already have a list of them all in the > > class structure? > > Thanks, indeed, I can use class helpers for that. > > > > > > +static DEFINE_IDA(wwan_ida); > > > +static DEFINE_MUTEX(wwan_global_lock); > > > > What is this lock for? I don't think you need a lock for a ida/idr > > structure if you use it in the "simple" mode, right? > > > > > +struct class *wwan_class; > > > > Why is this a global structure? > > It's also used inside wwan_port.c, but we can also retrieve the class > directly from wwandev->dev.class, so yes it's not strictly necessary > to have it global. Ick, no, don't get it from ->dev.class. Put both of these files into one .c file, there's no need for two different ones, right? > > > + wwandev->usage++; > > > > Hah, why? You now have 2 reference counts for the same structure? > > 'usage' is probably not the right term, but this counter tracks device > registration life to determine when the device must be unregistered > from the system (several wwan drivers can be exposed as a unique wwan > device), while device kref tracks the wwan device life. They are kind > of coupled, but a device can not be released if not priorly > unregistered. This feels totally unneeded and unnecessary. Just use the built-in reference counting and all should be fine. To try to keep yet-another-reference-count in your structure just means that you have 2 values controlling one life-span. Ripe for disaster. > > > +void wwan_port_deinit(void) > > > +{ > > > + unregister_chrdev(wwan_major, "wwanport"); > > > + idr_destroy(&wwan_port_idr); > > > +} > > > > > > I'm confused, you have 1 class, but 2 different major numbers for this > > class? You have a device and ports with different numbers, how are they > > all tied together? > > There is one wwan class with different device types (wwan devices and > wwan control ports), a port is a child of a wwan device. Only wwan > ports are exposed as character devices and IDR is used for getting a > minor. wwan device IDA is just used to alloc unique wwan device ID. Ok, that's fine but you need to: > > > +struct wwan_port { > > > + struct wwan_device *wwandev; > > > + const struct file_operations *fops; > > > + void *private_data; > > > + enum wwan_port_type type; > > > + > > > + /* private */ > > > + unsigned int id; > > > + int minor; > > > + struct list_head list; > > > > So a port is not a device? Why not? > > A port is represented as a device, device_create is called when port > is attached to wwan core, but it indeed would make more sense to > simply make wwan_port a device. Make this a real device. That will solve your lifetime rules automatically and make things simpler. I feel like we create these types of "driver subsystem frameworks" every kernel release, and each time I review them people get them wrong. What can the driver core do to help make this whole thing easier? We have misc-device, which makes creating a char device node dirt-simple, what more can I do to make creating a device class and char device node interaction simpler to keep everyone from having to write the same code all the time and have the chance to get it wrong (in unique ways each time...) thanks, greg k-h
diff --git a/drivers/net/Kconfig b/drivers/net/Kconfig index 260f9f4..ec00f92 100644 --- a/drivers/net/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/net/Kconfig @@ -500,6 +500,8 @@ source "drivers/net/wan/Kconfig" source "drivers/net/ieee802154/Kconfig" +source "drivers/net/wwan/Kconfig" + config XEN_NETDEV_FRONTEND tristate "Xen network device frontend driver" depends on XEN diff --git a/drivers/net/Makefile b/drivers/net/Makefile index f4990ff..5da6424 100644 --- a/drivers/net/Makefile +++ b/drivers/net/Makefile @@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SUNGEM_PHY) += sungem_phy.o obj-$(CONFIG_WAN) += wan/ obj-$(CONFIG_WLAN) += wireless/ obj-$(CONFIG_IEEE802154) += ieee802154/ +obj-$(CONFIG_WWAN) += wwan/ obj-$(CONFIG_VMXNET3) += vmxnet3/ obj-$(CONFIG_XEN_NETDEV_FRONTEND) += xen-netfront.o diff --git a/drivers/net/wwan/Kconfig b/drivers/net/wwan/Kconfig new file mode 100644 index 0000000..545fe54 --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/net/wwan/Kconfig @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@ +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only +# +# Wireless WAN device configuration +# + +menuconfig WWAN + bool "Wireless WAN" + help + This section contains Wireless WAN driver configurations. + +if WWAN + +config WWAN_CORE + tristate "WWAN Driver Core" + help + Say Y here if you want to use the WWAN driver core. This driver + provides a common framework for WWAN drivers. + + To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module will be + called wwan. + +endif # WWAN diff --git a/drivers/net/wwan/Makefile b/drivers/net/wwan/Makefile new file mode 100644 index 0000000..ca8bb5a --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/net/wwan/Makefile @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +# +# Makefile for the Linux WWAN device drivers. +# + +obj-$(CONFIG_WWAN_CORE) += wwan.o +wwan-objs += wwan_core.o wwan_port.o + diff --git a/drivers/net/wwan/wwan_core.c b/drivers/net/wwan/wwan_core.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..42ba6c0 --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/net/wwan/wwan_core.c @@ -0,0 +1,150 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only +/* Copyright (c) 2021, Linaro Ltd <loic.poulain@linaro.org> */ + +#include <linux/err.h> +#include <linux/errno.h> +#include <linux/init.h> +#include <linux/fs.h> +#include <linux/idr.h> +#include <linux/kernel.h> +#include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/slab.h> +#include <linux/types.h> +#include <linux/wwan.h> + +#include "wwan_core.h" + +static LIST_HEAD(wwan_list); /* list of registered wwan devices */ +static DEFINE_IDA(wwan_ida); +static DEFINE_MUTEX(wwan_global_lock); +struct class *wwan_class; + +static struct wwan_device *__wwan_find_by_parent(struct device *parent) +{ + struct wwan_device *wwandev; + + if (!parent) + return NULL; + + list_for_each_entry(wwandev, &wwan_list, list) { + if (wwandev->dev.parent == parent) + return wwandev; + } + + return NULL; +} + +static void wwan_dev_release(struct device *dev) +{ + struct wwan_device *wwandev = to_wwan_dev(dev); + + kfree(wwandev); +} + +static const struct device_type wwan_type = { + .name = "wwan", + .release = wwan_dev_release, +}; + +struct wwan_device *wwan_create_dev(struct device *parent) +{ + struct wwan_device *wwandev; + int err, id; + + mutex_lock(&wwan_global_lock); + + wwandev = __wwan_find_by_parent(parent); + if (wwandev) { + get_device(&wwandev->dev); + wwandev->usage++; + goto done_unlock; + } + + id = ida_alloc(&wwan_ida, GFP_KERNEL); + if (id < 0) + goto done_unlock; + + wwandev = kzalloc(sizeof(*wwandev), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!wwandev) { + ida_free(&wwan_ida, id); + goto done_unlock; + } + + wwandev->dev.parent = parent; + wwandev->dev.class = wwan_class; + wwandev->dev.type = &wwan_type; + wwandev->id = id; + dev_set_name(&wwandev->dev, "wwan%d", wwandev->id); + wwandev->usage = 1; + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&wwandev->ports); + + err = device_register(&wwandev->dev); + if (err) { + put_device(&wwandev->dev); + ida_free(&wwan_ida, id); + wwandev = NULL; + goto done_unlock; + } + + list_add_tail(&wwandev->list, &wwan_list); + +done_unlock: + mutex_unlock(&wwan_global_lock); + + return wwandev; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(wwan_create_dev); + +void wwan_destroy_dev(struct wwan_device *wwandev) +{ + mutex_lock(&wwan_global_lock); + wwandev->usage--; + + if (wwandev->usage) + goto done_unlock; + + /* Someone destroyed the wwan device without removing ports */ + WARN_ON(!list_empty(&wwandev->ports)); + + list_del(&wwandev->list); + device_unregister(&wwandev->dev); + ida_free(&wwan_ida, wwandev->id); + put_device(&wwandev->dev); + +done_unlock: + mutex_unlock(&wwan_global_lock); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(wwan_destroy_dev); + +static int __init wwan_init(void) +{ + int err; + + wwan_class = class_create(THIS_MODULE, "wwan"); + if (IS_ERR(wwan_class)) + return PTR_ERR(wwan_class); + + err = wwan_port_init(); + if (err) + goto err_class_destroy; + + return 0; + +err_class_destroy: + class_destroy(wwan_class); + return err; +} + +static void __exit wwan_exit(void) +{ + wwan_port_deinit(); + class_destroy(wwan_class); +} + +//subsys_initcall(wwan_init); +module_init(wwan_init); +module_exit(wwan_exit); + +MODULE_AUTHOR("Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@linaro.org>"); +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("WWAN core"); +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2"); diff --git a/drivers/net/wwan/wwan_core.h b/drivers/net/wwan/wwan_core.h new file mode 100644 index 0000000..21d187a --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/net/wwan/wwan_core.h @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */ +/* Copyright (c) 2021, Linaro Ltd <loic.poulain@linaro.org> */ + +#ifndef __WWAN_CORE_H +#define __WWAN_CORE_H + +#include <linux/device.h> +#include <linux/wwan.h> + +#define to_wwan_dev(d) container_of(d, struct wwan_device, dev) + +struct wwan_device *wwan_create_dev(struct device *parent); +void wwan_destroy_dev(struct wwan_device *wwandev); + +int wwan_port_init(void); +void wwan_port_deinit(void); + +extern struct class *wwan_class; + +#endif /* WWAN_CORE_H */ diff --git a/drivers/net/wwan/wwan_port.c b/drivers/net/wwan/wwan_port.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..b32da8f --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/net/wwan/wwan_port.c @@ -0,0 +1,136 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only +/* Copyright (c) 2021, Linaro Ltd <loic.poulain@linaro.org> */ + +#include <linux/err.h> +#include <linux/errno.h> +#include <linux/fs.h> +#include <linux/idr.h> +#include <linux/kernel.h> +#include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/wwan.h> + +#include "wwan_core.h" + +#define WWAN_MAX_MINORS 32 + +static int wwan_major; +static DEFINE_IDR(wwan_port_idr); +static DEFINE_MUTEX(wwan_port_idr_lock); + +static const char * const wwan_port_type_str[] = { + "AT", + "MBIM", + "QMI", + "QCDM", + "FIREHOSE" +}; + +int wwan_add_port(struct wwan_port *port) +{ + struct wwan_device *wwandev = port->wwandev; + struct device *dev; + int minor, err; + + if (port->type >= WWAN_PORT_MAX || !port->fops || !wwandev) + return -EINVAL; + + mutex_lock(&wwan_port_idr_lock); + minor = idr_alloc(&wwan_port_idr, port, 0, WWAN_MAX_MINORS, GFP_KERNEL); + mutex_unlock(&wwan_port_idr_lock); + + if (minor < 0) + return minor; + + mutex_lock(&wwandev->lock); + + dev = device_create(wwan_class, &wwandev->dev, + MKDEV(wwan_major, minor), port, + "wwan%dp%u%s", wwandev->id, wwandev->port_idx, + wwan_port_type_str[port->type]); + if (IS_ERR(dev)) { + err = PTR_ERR(dev); + mutex_unlock(&wwandev->lock); + goto error_free_idr; + } + + port->id = wwandev->port_idx++; + port->minor = minor; + + list_add(&port->list, &wwandev->ports); + + mutex_unlock(&port->wwandev->lock); + + return 0; + +error_free_idr: + mutex_lock(&wwan_port_idr_lock); + idr_remove(&wwan_port_idr, minor); + mutex_unlock(&wwan_port_idr_lock); + + return err; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(wwan_add_port); + +void wwan_remove_port(struct wwan_port *port) +{ + struct wwan_device *wwandev = port->wwandev; + + WARN_ON(!wwandev); + + mutex_lock(&wwandev->lock); + device_destroy(wwan_class, MKDEV(wwan_major, port->minor)); + list_del(&port->list); + mutex_unlock(&wwandev->lock); + + mutex_lock(&wwan_port_idr_lock); + idr_remove(&wwan_port_idr, port->minor); + mutex_unlock(&wwan_port_idr_lock); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(wwan_remove_port); + +static int wwan_port_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file) +{ + const struct file_operations *new_fops; + unsigned int minor = iminor(inode); + struct wwan_port *port; + int err = 0; + + mutex_lock(&wwan_port_idr_lock); + port = idr_find(&wwan_port_idr, minor); + if (!port) { + mutex_unlock(&wwan_port_idr_lock); + return -ENODEV; + } + mutex_unlock(&wwan_port_idr_lock); + + file->private_data = port->private_data ? port->private_data : port; + stream_open(inode, file); + + new_fops = fops_get(port->fops); + replace_fops(file, new_fops); + if (file->f_op->open) + err = file->f_op->open(inode, file); + + return err; +} + +static const struct file_operations wwan_port_fops = { + .owner = THIS_MODULE, + .open = wwan_port_open, + .llseek = noop_llseek, +}; + +int wwan_port_init(void) +{ + wwan_major = register_chrdev(0, "wwanport", &wwan_port_fops); + if (wwan_major < 0) + return wwan_major; + + return 0; +} + +void wwan_port_deinit(void) +{ + unregister_chrdev(wwan_major, "wwanport"); + idr_destroy(&wwan_port_idr); +} diff --git a/include/linux/wwan.h b/include/linux/wwan.h new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6caca5c --- /dev/null +++ b/include/linux/wwan.h @@ -0,0 +1,121 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */ +/* Copyright (c) 2021, Linaro Ltd <loic.poulain@linaro.org> */ + +#ifndef __WWAN_H +#define __WWAN_H + +#include <linux/device.h> +#include <linux/kernel.h> + +/** + * struct wwan_device - The structure that defines a WWAN device + * + * @id: WWAN device unique ID. + * @usage: WWAN device usage counter. + * @dev: underlying device. + * @list: list to chain WWAN devices. + * @ports: list of attached wwan_port. + * @port_idx: port index counter. + * @lock: mutex protecting members of this structure. + */ +struct wwan_device { + int id; + unsigned int usage; + + struct device dev; + struct list_head list; + + struct list_head ports; + unsigned int port_idx; + + struct mutex lock; +}; + +/** + * enum wwan_port_type - WWAN port types + * @WWAN_PORT_AT: AT commands. + * @WWAN_PORT_MBIM: Mobile Broadband Interface Model control. + * @WWAN_PORT_QMI: Qcom modem/MSM interface for modem control. + * @WWAN_PORT_QCDM: Qcom Modem diagnostic interface. + * @WWAN_PORT_FIREHOSE: XML based command protocol. + * @WWAN_PORT_MAX + */ +enum wwan_port_type { + WWAN_PORT_AT, + WWAN_PORT_MBIM, + WWAN_PORT_QMI, + WWAN_PORT_QCDM, + WWAN_PORT_FIREHOSE, + WWAN_PORT_MAX, +}; + +/** + * struct wwan_port - The structure that defines a WWAN port + * + * @wwandev: WWAN device this port belongs to. + * @fops: Port file operations. + * @private_data: underlying device. + * @type: port type. + * @id: port allocated ID. + * @minor: port allocated minor ID for cdev. + * @list: list to chain WWAN ports. + */ +struct wwan_port { + struct wwan_device *wwandev; + const struct file_operations *fops; + void *private_data; + enum wwan_port_type type; + + /* private */ + unsigned int id; + int minor; + struct list_head list; +}; + +#define to_wwan_dev(d) container_of(d, struct wwan_device, dev) + +/** + * wwan_create_dev - Create a new WWAN device + * @parent: parent device of the WWAN device + * + * If parent is not NULL, WWAN core ensures that only one WWAN device is + * allocated for a given parent. If a WWAN device with the specified parent + * already exists, a reference is taken and the WWAN device is returned. + * + * This function must be balanced with a call to wwan_destroy_dev(). + * + * Returns pointer to the wwan_device or NULL. + */ +struct wwan_device *wwan_create_dev(struct device *parent); + +/** + * wwan_create_dev - Destroy a WWAN device + * @wwandev: wwan_device to destroy + * + * This releases a previoulsy created WWAN device. + */ +void wwan_destroy_dev(struct wwan_device *wwandev); + +/** + * wwan_add_port - Add a new WWAN port + * @port: WWAN port to add + * + * Prior calling this function, caller must allocate and fill the wwan_port + * with wwandev, fops, and type fields. A port is automatically exposed to + * user as character device, and provided file operations will be used. + * + * This function must be balanced with a call to wwan_remove_port(). + * + * Returns zero on success or a negative error code. + */ +int wwan_add_port(struct wwan_port *port); + +/** + * wwan_remove_port - Remove a WWAN port + * @port: WWAN port to remove + * + * Remove a previously added port. + */ +void wwan_remove_port(struct wwan_port *port); + +#endif /* __WWAN_H */
This change introduces initial support for a WWAN subsystem. Given the complexity and heterogeneity of existing WWAN hardwares and interfaces, there is no strict definition of what a WWAN device is and how it should be represented. It's often a collection of multiple components/devices that perform the global WWAN feature (netdev, tty, chardev, etc). One usual way to expose modem controls and configuration is via high level protocols such as the well known AT command protocol, MBIM or QMI. The USB modems started to expose that as character devices, and user daemons such as ModemManager learnt how to deal with that. This initial version adds the concept of WWAN port, which can be registered by any driver to expose one of these protocols. The WWAN core takes care of the generic part, including character device creation and lets the driver implementing access (fops) to the selected protocol. Since the different components/devices do no necesserarly know about each others, and can be created/removed in different orders, the WWAN core ensures that devices being part of the same hardware are also represented as a unique WWAN device, relying on the provided parent device (e.g. mhi controller, USB device). It's a 'trick' I copied from Johannes's earlier WWAN subsystem proposal. This initial version is purposely minimalist, it's essentially moving the generic part of the previously proposed mhi_wwan_ctrl driver inside a common WWAN framework, but the implementation is open and flexible enough to allow extension for further drivers. Signed-off-by: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@linaro.org> --- v2: not part of the series v3: not part of the series v4: Introduce WWAN framework/subsystem v5: Specify WWAN_CORE module name in Kconfig drivers/net/Kconfig | 2 + drivers/net/Makefile | 1 + drivers/net/wwan/Kconfig | 22 +++++++ drivers/net/wwan/Makefile | 8 +++ drivers/net/wwan/wwan_core.c | 150 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/net/wwan/wwan_core.h | 20 ++++++ drivers/net/wwan/wwan_port.c | 136 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/linux/wwan.h | 121 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 8 files changed, 460 insertions(+) create mode 100644 drivers/net/wwan/Kconfig create mode 100644 drivers/net/wwan/Makefile create mode 100644 drivers/net/wwan/wwan_core.c create mode 100644 drivers/net/wwan/wwan_core.h create mode 100644 drivers/net/wwan/wwan_port.c create mode 100644 include/linux/wwan.h -- 2.7.4