Message ID | CAKdteObDZJp7m0G-dXOqLqDKvAa3=Qc+UewHhZw-o0=2p72_ww@mail.gmail.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@linaro.org> wrote: > Hi, > > Following discussions after Thomas's patches improving bswap support > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg01279.html > > I noticed that: > * the associated tests weren't executed on aarch64_be > * ARM targets older than v6 do not support the needed instructions. > > The attached patch changes check_effective_target_bswap(): > - accept aarch64*-*-* instead of aarch64-*-* > - when target is arm*-*-*, check __ARM_ARCH >= 6 > > 2014-10-29 Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@linaro.org> > > * lib/target-supports.exp (check_effective_target_bswap): Update > conditions for AArch64 and ARM targets. > > OK? The ARM (AArch32) changes are ok. Ramana > > Christophe.
On 31 October 2014 18:15, Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana.gcc@googlemail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Christophe Lyon > <christophe.lyon@linaro.org> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Following discussions after Thomas's patches improving bswap support >> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg01279.html >> >> I noticed that: >> * the associated tests weren't executed on aarch64_be >> * ARM targets older than v6 do not support the needed instructions. >> >> The attached patch changes check_effective_target_bswap(): >> - accept aarch64*-*-* instead of aarch64-*-* >> - when target is arm*-*-*, check __ARM_ARCH >= 6 >> >> 2014-10-29 Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@linaro.org> >> >> * lib/target-supports.exp (check_effective_target_bswap): Update >> conditions for AArch64 and ARM targets. >> >> OK? > > The ARM (AArch32) changes are ok. > > Ramana > Thank you Ramana. Marcus, I believe the AArch64 part is obvious. OK? Christophe. >> >> Christophe.
On 5 November 2014 12:08, Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@linaro.org> wrote: > On 31 October 2014 18:15, Ramana Radhakrishnan > <ramana.gcc@googlemail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Christophe Lyon >> <christophe.lyon@linaro.org> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Following discussions after Thomas's patches improving bswap support >>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg01279.html >>> >>> I noticed that: >>> * the associated tests weren't executed on aarch64_be >>> * ARM targets older than v6 do not support the needed instructions. >>> >>> The attached patch changes check_effective_target_bswap(): >>> - accept aarch64*-*-* instead of aarch64-*-* >>> - when target is arm*-*-*, check __ARM_ARCH >= 6 >>> >>> 2014-10-29 Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@linaro.org> >>> >>> * lib/target-supports.exp (check_effective_target_bswap): Update >>> conditions for AArch64 and ARM targets. >>> >>> OK? >> >> The ARM (AArch32) changes are ok. >> >> Ramana >> > Thank you Ramana. > > Marcus, I believe the AArch64 part is obvious. OK? Yep, it looks obvious to me. /Marcus
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp b/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp index 4398345..80ff52d 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp +++ b/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp @@ -4892,9 +4892,8 @@ proc check_effective_target_bswap { } { verbose "check_effective_target_bswap: using cached result" 2 } else { set et_bswap_saved 0 - if { [istarget aarch64-*-*] + if { [istarget aarch64*-*-*] || [istarget alpha*-*-*] - || [istarget arm*-*-*] || [istarget i?86-*-*] || [istarget m68k-*-*] || [istarget powerpc*-*-*] @@ -4902,6 +4901,16 @@ proc check_effective_target_bswap { } { || [istarget s390*-*-*] || [istarget x86_64-*-*] } { set et_bswap_saved 1 + } else { + if { [istarget arm*-*-*] + && [check_no_compiler_messages_nocache arm_v6_or_later object { + #if __ARM_ARCH < 6 + #error not armv6 or later + #endif + int i; + } ""] } { + set et_bswap_saved 1 + } } }