| Message ID | 1617114468-2928-1-git-send-email-wangyunjian@huawei.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [net] sch_htb: fix null pointer dereference on a null new_q | expand |
On 2021-03-30 17:27, wangyunjian wrote: > From: Yunjian Wang <wangyunjian@huawei.com> > > sch_htb: fix null pointer dereference on a null new_q > > Currently if new_q is null, the null new_q pointer will be > dereference when 'q->offload' is true. Fix this by adding > a braces around htb_parent_to_leaf_offload() to avoid it. I admit there is a NULL pointer dereference bug, but I believe this fix is not correct. > > Addresses-Coverity: ("Dereference after null check") > Fixes: d03b195b5aa0 ("sch_htb: Hierarchical QoS hardware offload") Please Cc the authors of the patches you fix, I found your commit accidentally. > > Signed-off-by: Yunjian Wang <wangyunjian@huawei.com> > --- > net/sched/sch_htb.c | 5 +++-- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/net/sched/sch_htb.c b/net/sched/sch_htb.c > index 62e12cb41a3e..081c11d5717c 100644 > --- a/net/sched/sch_htb.c > +++ b/net/sched/sch_htb.c > @@ -1675,9 +1675,10 @@ static int htb_delete(struct Qdisc *sch, unsigned long arg, > cl->parent->common.classid, > NULL); > if (q->offload) { > - if (new_q) > + if (new_q) { > htb_set_lockdep_class_child(new_q); > - htb_parent_to_leaf_offload(sch, dev_queue, new_q); > + htb_parent_to_leaf_offload(sch, dev_queue, new_q); Yes, new_q can be NULL at this point, which will crash in qdisc_refcount_inc, however, dropping the rest of the code of htb_parent_to_leaf_offload creates another bug. For example, htb_graft_helper properly handles the case when new_q is NULL, and by skipping this call you create an inconsistency: dev_queue->qdisc will still point to the old qdisc, but cl->parent->leaf.q will point to the new one (which will be noop_qdisc, because new_q was NULL). The code is based on an assumption that these two pointers are the same, so it can lead to refcount leaks. The correct fix would be to add a NULL pointer check to protect qdisc_refcount_inc inside htb_parent_to_leaf_offload. (Also, while reviewing this code, I found out that leaf.q being noop_qdisc isn't handled well in other places that read leaf.q->dev_queue - I'll have to address it myself.) Thanks, Max > + } > } > } > >
> -----Original Message----- > From: Maxim Mikityanskiy [mailto:maximmi@nvidia.com] > Sent: Thursday, June 3, 2021 5:53 PM > To: wangyunjian <wangyunjian@huawei.com>; netdev@vger.kernel.org > Cc: kuba@kernel.org; xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com; jhs@mojatatu.com; > jiri@resnulli.us; chenchanghu <chenchanghu@huawei.com>; David S. Miller > <davem@davemloft.net> > Subject: Re: [PATCH net] sch_htb: fix null pointer dereference on a null new_q > > On 2021-03-30 17:27, wangyunjian wrote: > > From: Yunjian Wang <wangyunjian@huawei.com> > > > > sch_htb: fix null pointer dereference on a null new_q > > > > Currently if new_q is null, the null new_q pointer will be dereference > > when 'q->offload' is true. Fix this by adding a braces around > > htb_parent_to_leaf_offload() to avoid it. > > I admit there is a NULL pointer dereference bug, but I believe this fix is not > correct. > > > > > Addresses-Coverity: ("Dereference after null check") > > Fixes: d03b195b5aa0 ("sch_htb: Hierarchical QoS hardware offload") > > Please Cc the authors of the patches you fix, I found your commit accidentally. > > > > > Signed-off-by: Yunjian Wang <wangyunjian@huawei.com> > > --- > > net/sched/sch_htb.c | 5 +++-- > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/net/sched/sch_htb.c b/net/sched/sch_htb.c index > > 62e12cb41a3e..081c11d5717c 100644 > > --- a/net/sched/sch_htb.c > > +++ b/net/sched/sch_htb.c > > @@ -1675,9 +1675,10 @@ static int htb_delete(struct Qdisc *sch, unsigned > long arg, > > cl->parent->common.classid, > > NULL); > > if (q->offload) { > > - if (new_q) > > + if (new_q) { > > htb_set_lockdep_class_child(new_q); > > - htb_parent_to_leaf_offload(sch, dev_queue, new_q); > > + htb_parent_to_leaf_offload(sch, dev_queue, new_q); > > Yes, new_q can be NULL at this point, which will crash in qdisc_refcount_inc, > however, dropping the rest of the code of htb_parent_to_leaf_offload creates > another bug. For example, htb_graft_helper properly handles the case when > new_q is NULL, and by skipping this call you create an inconsistency: > dev_queue->qdisc will still point to the old qdisc, but cl->parent->leaf.q will > point to the new one (which will be noop_qdisc, because new_q was NULL). The > code is based on an assumption that these two pointers are the same, so it can > lead to refcount leaks. > > The correct fix would be to add a NULL pointer check to protect > qdisc_refcount_inc inside htb_parent_to_leaf_offload. OK, I will send a patch to fix it. Thanks > > (Also, while reviewing this code, I found out that leaf.q being noop_qdisc isn't > handled well in other places that read leaf.q->dev_queue - I'll have to address it > myself.) > > Thanks, > Max > > > + } > > } > > } > > > >
diff --git a/net/sched/sch_htb.c b/net/sched/sch_htb.c index 62e12cb41a3e..081c11d5717c 100644 --- a/net/sched/sch_htb.c +++ b/net/sched/sch_htb.c @@ -1675,9 +1675,10 @@ static int htb_delete(struct Qdisc *sch, unsigned long arg, cl->parent->common.classid, NULL); if (q->offload) { - if (new_q) + if (new_q) { htb_set_lockdep_class_child(new_q); - htb_parent_to_leaf_offload(sch, dev_queue, new_q); + htb_parent_to_leaf_offload(sch, dev_queue, new_q); + } } }